rss
1

Stop using the American flag to fan the flames of virulent nationalism

Howard Zinn, writing at Alternet: 

On this July 4, we would do well to renounce nationalism and all its symbols: its flags, its pledges of allegiance, its anthems, its insistence in song that God must single out America to be blessed.

Is not nationalism — that devotion to a flag, an anthem, a boundary so fierce it engenders mass murder — one of the great evils of our time, along with racism, along with religious hatred? . . .

And nationalism is given a special virulence when it is said to be blessed by Providence. Today we have a president, invading two countries in four years, who announced on the campaign trail in 2004 that God speaks through him.

We need to refute the idea that our nation is different from, morally superior to, the other imperial powers of world history.

We need to assert our allegiance to the human race, and not to any one nation.

Zinn is the author of A People’s History of the United States.

  • Share/Bookmark
Related posts:
  1. Maher on what it means to wear a little American flag on your lapel
  2. Kucinich: Cheney impeachment is the only way to stop U.S. from attacking Iran
  3. To Senator Jim Talent: stop playing God on the stem cell issue
  4. The hypocrisy of charging that the American flag has been desecrated
  5. The American Conservative: Bush Must Go

About the Author

Erich Vieth is an iconoclastic attorney, musician and writer living in the Shaw neighborhood of St. Louis, Missouri. He and his wife Anne Jay have two daughters, aged 9 and 11.

Comments (1)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. grumpypilgrim says:

    This post reminds me of my own puzzlement over American nationalism (indeed, any person’s nationalism) — an issue I wrote about in this post (http://dangerousintersection.org/?p=585), in which I questioned why Americans derive pride merely from the accident of where they were born. True, different nations have different rules, but, fundamentally, nations are little more than arbitrary lines on the ground that designate different groups of people who happen to live by different rules — each group merely running a different experiment in how to live together. Why one national group should be “proud” of itself, especially when its current occupants had virtually no role in creating the rules of that nation, and when its experiment is not yet over, strikes me as absurd in the extreme.

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word