Reverse Engineer Your Mind and Body

In his excellent book, Outlive: The Science and Art of Longevity, Peter Attia stresses the importance of intentionally putting in the time now to safeguard your physical function and independence in later decades. He refers to this as the "Centenarian Decathlon," where individuals reverse-engineer their fitness goals by imagining the physical demands they'll face in their 90s or 100s—such as carrying groceries, playing with grandchildren, hiking, or simply rising from the floor unaided, and then building the necessary strength, stability, and endurance today to make those activities possible and perhaps likely.

Attia warns that without this forward-thinking approach, natural age-related declines (like muscle loss, reduced VO₂ max, and joint instability) erode over time, causing your body to become frail. Instead, you need to treat exercise as the most powerful "drug" for longevity, structured around four pillars: stability (to prevent injury and support safe movement), strength (to build muscle reserve), aerobic efficiency (for cardiovascular health), and anaerobic performance (for high-intensity bursts). An excerpt:

I ask all my patients to sketch out an alternative future for themselves. What do you want to be doing in your later decades? What is your plan for the rest of your life?

Everyone has a slightly different answer--they might want to travel, or continue playing golf or hiking in nature, or simply be able to play with their grandkids and great-grandkids (top of my own list). The point of this exercise is twofold. First, it forces people to focus on their own endgame, which most of us might prefer to avoid thinking about. Economists call this "hyperbolic discounting," the natural tendency for people to choose immediate gratification over potential future gains, especially if those gains entail hard work. Second, it drives home the importance of healthspan. If Becky wants to enjoy a healthy, rewarding life in her later years, and not repeat her mother's fate, she will have to maintain and hopefully improve her physical and cognitive function every decade between now and then. Otherwise, the gravitational pull of aging will do its thing, and she will decline, just as her mother did....

You remain relatively robust until about the fifth decade of life, at which point your cognitive and physical health will likely begin a gradual but steady decline, until you die (healthspan = zero) sometime in your sixties or early seventies. This would have been a not untypical lifespan for someone born into a hunter-gatherer or primitive agrarian tribe, provided they managed to avoid early death thanks to infectious disease or another calamity.

Attia distinguishes lifespan from healthspan:

The important distinction here is that while actual death is inevitable, this deterioration that were talking about is less so. Not everyone who dies in their eighties or nineties passes through the valleys of cognitive, physical, or emotional destruction on the way there. They are preventable--and I believe that they are largely optional, despite their ever-increasing gravitational pull over time. As we will see in later chapters, cognitive, physical, and even emotional deterioration can all be slowed and even reversed in some cases with the application of the proper tactics.

The other key point is that lifespan and healthspan are not independent variables; they are tightly intertwined. If you increase your muscle strength and improve your cardiorespiratory fitness, you have also reduced your risk of dying from all causes by a far greater magnitude than you could achieve by taking any cocktail of medications. The same goes for better cognitive and emotional health. The actions we take to improve our healthspan will almost always result in a longer lifespan. This is why our tactics are largely aimed at improving healthspan first; the lifespan benefits will follow.

[ pp. 40-46] Attia urges that by investing effort today you will "future-proof" your body, preventing decline so your older self remains capable and vibrant. In essence, Attia argues that if you work on these things, you will be giving a gift to your future physical self, enabling a higher quality of life rather than merely extending lifespan.

Why not do something similar to protect your mind? Exerting cognitive load builds up your ability to think. Reading widely (rather than simply following corporate news) will protect you from being manipulated by gaslighting and psyops. Now is the time to protect that version of you that will exist in five or 10 years!

[Supp Oct 3, 2025]

Lack of concern with health and growth, even if done in private, are obvious in public. One's huge belly is a lie detector regarding one's bad diet & and lack of exercise. One's willingness to make ad hominem arguments betrays one's refusal to engage with uncomfortable ideas.

Continue ReadingReverse Engineer Your Mind and Body

The Problem with Aluminum in Vaccines

How dangerous is it to have aluminum in our vaccines?  I've never heard it discussed until recently, when President Trump indicated that he would like to have aluminum removed from all vaccines.

Maryanne Demasi has written "A chat with 'Mr Aluminium': Trump’s Tylenol warning stole the headlines, but his vow to strip aluminum from vaccines was the real shock. I asked Dr Chris Exley—Mr Aluminium himself—what it would mean for the vaccine industry."

[Dr Chris Exley] has published over 200 peer-reviewed papers on the subject, showing how aluminium accumulates in the brain, how it is trafficked by immune cells, and how it may be implicated in conditions from Alzheimer’s disease to autism.

His 2018 paper revealed some of the highest levels of aluminium ever recorded in human brain tissue, including in children diagnosed with autism.

In the wake of Trump’s press conference, Exley argued that Tylenol exposure in pregnancy alone cannot explain severe, debilitating autism — and that this kind of brain damage is far more likely linked to infant exposure to aluminium in vaccines.

Exley has also been one of the most outspoken critics of the HPV vaccine Gardasil, warning that Merck’s novel aluminium adjuvant, amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS), is unusually potent, biologically reactive and unsafe.

His stance has made him a target, costing him funding and institutional support, but his voice remains central to any honest debate about aluminium and vaccines.

Who is Dr. Chris Exley? This, according to Grok:

Dr. Christopher Exley is an English chemist renowned for his extensive research on the health effects of aluminum exposure in humans. He specializes in bioinorganic chemistry, focusing on how aluminum interacts with biological systems and its potential links to neurological conditions.EducationExley earned his PhD from the University of Stirling in 1989. His doctoral thesis, supervised by J. D. Birchall, examined the amelioration of aluminum toxicity in Atlantic salmon, with a particular emphasis on aluminum-silicon interactions.CareerHe is a Professor of Bioinorganic Chemistry at Keele University, where he serves as the group leader of the Bioinorganic Chemistry Laboratory. In 1994, he received a Royal Society University Research Fellowship, supporting his early career work. As of 2025, he remains affiliated with Keele University and continues to lead research on aluminum through the university's dedicated resources. Exley is also active as a public communicator, maintaining a Substack newsletter ("Dr's Newsletter") where he discusses the bioinorganic chemistry of aluminum, with recent posts as late as July 2025.

For more about Exley's work, see his website.

Continue ReadingThe Problem with Aluminum in Vaccines

FDA Corruption in the Spotlight at ACIP

Many people tell me that RFK, Jr. is a lunatic even though they haven't bothered to watched any of his videos. Never read any of his words. Well, he appointed a bunch of competent doctors and medical researchers to ACIP and for the first time in memory, Big Pharma and the FDA are being put under the spotlight. Here, the FDA effectively admits regulatory capture. Pharma has been its boss-and the FDA hasn't been questioning Pfizer's corrupt research. Real research is now showing that spike protein wanders all over the body (and lingers, damaging hearts and other organs) and the so-called COVID vax is contaminated by DNA. FDA: We can solve that problem by putting our head in the sand. That will protect Pfizer, our boss.

I am so very grateful that RFK, Jr. has cleaned house, but you'd never know the good things that are happening if you rely on corporate media.

Mary Talley Brown, MD, is a doctor who had her license threatened for using her medical judgment to treat COVID patients (instead of jamming endless boosters into her patients):

This is the most important exchange from the ACIP meeting. FDA admits to @KMilhoanMDPhD it has not performed independent inspection of mRNA shots for DNA contamination, instead relying on Pfizer and Moderna’s data. Multiple independent studies have shown excess levels of DNA contamination in these products, and @US_FDA is aware but not taking action.

Continue ReadingFDA Corruption in the Spotlight at ACIP

The COVID Origins Payoff

This story has still not had proper exposure in the corporate press. Perhaps it never will. The following post is by Camus. It summarizes a conversation between Megyn Kelly and RFK, Jr:

Of all the COVID cover-ups, the February 1, 2020, teleconference may be the most damning.

As revealed by Megyn Kelly and RFK Jr., when the world’s top virologists first saw the virus, their overwhelming consensus was that it was man-made. The notes from that call are clear.

Yet, just days later, that scientific consensus performed a miraculous 180. The lab-leak theory was suddenly denounced not just as wrong, but as racist.

Why the reversal? RFK Jr. connects the dots: Virtually every scientist on that call had a massive financial conflict of interest.

They were either:

• Directly doing work at the Wuhan Lab.

• Receiving tens of millions in grants from Tony Fauci’s NIH.

• Funded by the Wellcome Trust, an arm of Big Pharma.

Their reward for killing the lab-leak theory? Larger grants than ever before—some as high as $60 million.

They were paid to create a “scientific” orthodoxy that silenced all dissent, smearing questions as conspiracy theories.

The truth was suppressed not by science, but by a lucrative financial cartel. Follow the money.

Continue ReadingThe COVID Origins Payoff