What we can learn from the geographic clumping of dialects and religions.

August 29, 2006 | By | 1 Reply More

Check out the map below.  It is a map of the Linguistic Geography of the Mainland United States (a higher resolution version is available here):

 linguistic map.jpg

Imagine that there is some loony person who would argue that the dialect he speaks is the one true, objectively superior dialect and that all other dialects are inferior and actually not true. To dispell that notion, we would merely point out that the dialects tend to dominate geographical regions because people of particular regions tend to learn that dialect from each other as well as passing that dialect on to their children.  It’s not because people carefully considered which dialect to speak before speaking.

Now consider one more map:

 church geography.jpg

You can find a higher resolution of this map here.  This is a map of the predominant types of religions found in various regions of the U.S.  As you can see, this map demonstrates that certain religions dominate certain geographic regions (I’m not claiming that religions line up with the dialects, though there are some similarities). Just as with languages, most people don’t usually compare a variety of religions before choosing their own religion (certainly, they don’t do any such shopping while they are children). 

If people did tend to choose their religions based on careful comparison shopping, we wouldn’t see particular religions dominating geographic regions.  Instead, we’d see a single blended color running from sea to shining sea. 

I would conclude that most people (don’t) choose their region’s religion the same way they (don’t) choose their region’s dialect.  Instead, they “choose” the one they were taught while they sat on their parents’ laps.  This “geography of religions” is something to keep in mind whenever you hear a claim that any particular religion is the one true, holy, apostolic, infallible, objectively correct, ideal, unerring, authentic and undeniably true religion.  In these modern times, where ideas travel at the speed of light, the geographic clumping of religions is not consistent with a widespread deliberate choice of religion based upon a perceived superiority of a particular doctrine.

Share

Tags: , ,

Category: American Culture, Language, Religion

About the Author ()

Erich Vieth is an attorney focusing on consumer law litigation and appellate practice. He is also a working musician and a writer, having founded Dangerous Intersection in 2006. Erich lives in the Shaw Neighborhood of St. Louis, Missouri, where he lives half-time with his two extraordinary daughters.

Comments (1)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Deb says:

    If you created a denominational overlay onto a map of the various Indian reservations, you would find something interesting there, too. Each reservation tends to be of a specific denomination, and it isn't because children have the same religion as their parents. It is a result of the government, through the Department of War and later the Department of the Interior's giving denominations the right to proselytize at a specific reservation. It was a type of franchise system, creating territories for the groups vying to convert the heathens. Episcopals would get one reservation, Baptists another, Roman Catholics, another, etc.

    As an aside, note that once the government decided the war department didn't need to treat with Indians any longer and formally declared them not to be independent hostile nations, they recategorized them as natural resources like oil and lumber.

Leave a Reply