No True Inert Placebos Were Used for Testing Most Childhood Vaccines. Why Not?

Industry allied experts claim that it would be unethical to test a vaccine against a true inert placebo like saline. Really? Del Bigtree explains that the Pharma-preferred tests (against already existing vaccines) are like testing the safety of whiskey by comparing it to the "placebo" of vodka.

But I keep coming back to the claim of "unethical." This makes no sense to me, no matter how many times I hear an industry insider make the claim. Aaron Siri explored this exact topic in his outstanding new book, Vaccines, Amen! Here's an excerpt from page 163:

Ethics of Using and Not Using a Placebo

In response to the lack of a placebo in some trials, the FDA and vaccinologists will assert that it is unethical to evaluate the safety of an unlicensed experimental vaccine in a placebo-controlled trial when there is already a licensed vaccine for the same disease.

This ethical concern, however, rings hollow because it ethics were a real concern, the FDA would require placebo-controlled trials before licensing new experimental vaccines at least where no licensed vaccine exists to prevent the same disease. For example, the very first vaccines for chickenpox or hepatitis A, both licensed in 1995, or HPV, licensed in 2006, could have easily included a placebo control group. No ethical issue with that. But as you now know, that is not what happened because that is not how the cult of vaccinology works.

Also, consider this: conducting a placebo-controlled trial will leave a clearly defined group of children unvaccinated only for the duration of the trial in a controlled setting where they can be monitored. In contrast, injecting a vaccine into millions of children in an uncontrolled setting without first assessing its safety in a placebo-controlled trial is, to any objective, reasonable observer, grossly unethical conduct."

Continue ReadingNo True Inert Placebos Were Used for Testing Most Childhood Vaccines. Why Not?

How Does Pharma Test the Vaccines on the Childhood Schedule?

Eric Berg, MD explains how Pharma "tests" the vaccines on the childhood schedule. His explanation substantially overlaps that of Aaron Siri  (and see here and here). Here's how it was summed up on X by Valerie Anne Smith:

"When You Test A Drug, It's Against A Placebo."

"Vaccines Are Not Tested Against Placebos...They Are Tested Against Another Active Vaccine."

"That's Like Testing Whiskey Against Bourbon."

'Placebos' Used In Vaccine Clinical Trials As Listed From The Package Inserts For Common Vaccines:

Hepatitis B Clinical Trial...Placebo used was Aluminum Adjuvant & only safety tested for 5 days.

Vaxelis 6 in 1 Vaccine Trial...Placebo Was DTaP, Polio, HIB & Hep-B Vaccines.

HPV Gardasil Clinical Trial...Placebo used was Aluminum Adjuvant & Hep-A Vaccine. Only safety tested for 14 days.

Hepatitis A Clinical Trial...Placebo used was Hepatitis-B Vaccine & participants were monitored for 14 days.

Influenza A Clinical Trial...Placebo used was Influenza B Vaccine & clinical trial volunteers were followed for 28 days.

Meningitis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was the DTaP Vaccine & adverse reactions were monitored for 7 days.

Pertussis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was the Diphtheria & Tetanus Vaccine. Participants were followed for 14 days.

Prevnar-13 Pneumonia Clinical Trial...Placebo used was the Prevnar-7 Vaccine & volunteers were monitored for 7 days.

Polio Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Polio Vaccine & patients were monitored for 2 days.

Chicken Pox Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was diluted Chicken Pox Vaccine & trial volunteers were monitored for 42 days.

Shingles Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was diluted Shingles Vaccine & participants were followed for 7 days.

mNEXSPIKE Covid Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was SPIKEVAX Covid Vaccine & only safety tested 7 days.

Without informed consent & without the use of a saline placebo skews all results & makes all vaccines appear "safe & effective" because the adverse events & side effects in both groups are the same.

The US CDC Government's belief on placebos as stated on the CDC website...

"Testing a new vaccine against a saline injection is considered unethical."

"Depriving half of the trial participants of an older vaccine(which is approved to use as placebo) & giving them a true saline placebo instead would not be fair: it would actually be unethical."

"Saline injections don’t cause a sore arm, which might unwittingly reveal to the 'double blind volunteers' that they are in the placebo group. Those who get the experimental vaccine & those who get placebo must be kept secret."

Who is Dr. Eric Berg. Per Grok:

Dr. Eric Berg, DC (Doctor of Chiropractic), is a health educator, best-selling author, and chiropractor specializing in nutrition, Healthy Keto diets, and intermittent fasting. Born around 1965, he faced personal health challenges that inspired his career shift toward natural health solutions.

Continue ReadingHow Does Pharma Test the Vaccines on the Childhood Schedule?

Bret Weinstein: The Safety of Aluminum Adjuvants in Our Vaccines Has Not Been Tested

I regularly follow biologist Bret Weinstein (and his wife, biologist Heather Heying) on their Darkhorse Podcast. Here's Bret on Piers Morgan's show warning that the aluminum adjuvants used in most of our vaccines have not been safety tested. Very concerning.

Camus on X offers this summary:

The Unsettling Scientific Silence on Aluminum Adjuvants

A powerful point from Bret Weinstein highlights a critical failure in our public health dialogue: the refusal to properly study the systemic effects of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines.

The core of his argument is not anti-vaccine; it is pro-science. He states that if injecting aluminum into muscle is safe, that is "a scientifically easy thing to establish." The fact that this foundational work remains conspicuously undone is a glaring red flag.

So, what is an adjuvant? For the public, it's an additive designed to put the immune system on "high alert" so it reacts strongly to the vaccine's target antigen.

But therein lies the potential danger. The alarm sounded by the aluminum is non-specific. The immune system knows it's under threat, but it doesn't know from what. This is a radical biological intervention.

Weinstein, as an evolutionary biologist, posits a crucial question: Is this chronic, misdirected immune activation connected to the epidemic of modern ailments we see in younger generations?

Could it be a driver of the proliferating allergies? Is it a factor in the rise of serious, sometimes fatal, autoimmune conditions like asthma?

We simply do not know. These questions have not been properly investigated.

The conclusion is inescapable: even if a vaccine is beneficial for the specific disease it targets, the net impact on a person's lifelong health could very well be negative. We are making a massive, population-scale bet without the necessary data.

This isn't a conspiracy theory. It's a demand for rigorous, transparent science to answer a question that has been ignored for far too long.

Continue ReadingBret Weinstein: The Safety of Aluminum Adjuvants in Our Vaccines Has Not Been Tested

Jeffrey Tucker Describes the Bleak State of the World

Jeffrey Tucker has ambitiously taken the temperature of the political, economic and social world with an article titled: "The Coup, the Calamity, and the Conspiracy." I highly recommend a full read.

Tucker begins with this graphic:

Here is an excerpt:

[Y]ou could be more realistic and see that this was not a mistake at all. It was entirely intentional, the unfolding of a dark scheme hatched by an indescribably sadistic ruling class. Indeed, if this had all been an accident, we surely would have heard someone apologize by now.

There is also the planning involved. There was Event 201, the lesser-known Crimson Contagion, and many others. They are usually described in the mainstream press as rehearsals for unplanned contingencies, like resiliency training. Absurd. This was plotted far in advance. We have all the receipts. To realize this and connect the dots does not make you a conspiracy theorist. It makes you a person with the capacity to think.

To deny nefarious motives and schemes makes you impossibly naive to the point of sedation. At best, it makes you ill-read in history.

After five years, what can we say was the plan and purpose of this calamity? We all have our views. Certainly within Brownstone ranks, there are many opinions. We argue among ourselves all the time. Coming up with a clean and clear explanation is not easy because there are so many moving parts and so many industrial opportunists who took advantage of the crisis to cash out.

This is such an expansive article that resonated with me over and over.

I have many of the same concerns, but I won't say much here. I will say (as Tucker mentions in the early paragraphs) that I'm sure how well coordinated all of the powerful players are. Just because they are well-entrenched, monied and politically connected doesn't mean that they necessarily agree with each other day to day, much less year to year. But in my mind, there is definitely a hell of a lot of coordination.

The best solution to this horrific anti-Democratic mess is a vigorous, courageous and free press, but the powers-that-be know this deeply and they've got the formerly half-respectable "journalism" industry 95% locked down.

So in the meantime, it's Jeffrey Tucker, independent media and people like you and me doing what we can. It feels like a David and Goliath battle, especially when you see Trump kowtowing to Pfizer, just like Biden did and harris would have

Continue ReadingJeffrey Tucker Describes the Bleak State of the World