Vaccines Arrived Only After the Massive Drop in Many Diseases

This chart should be mandatory viewing for anyone wanting to debate whether any vaccines should be mandatory.

Roman Bystrianyk, Coauthor of Dissolving Illusions alongside Suzanne Humphries, MD:

The common belief that the decline in infectious disease deaths is due to modern medicine, like antibiotics and vaccines, is incorrect. The vast majority of the decline, particularly in the early 19th and 20th centuries, preceded these medical ideas.

Three key developments drove the earlier progress:

1. The rise of robust public health infrastructure, including engineered sanitation and sewer systems, protected municipal water supplies with filtration and chlorination, systematic garbage collection, early measures to control water and industrial air pollution, food safety regulations (e.g., meat inspection), and vector control (e.g., mosquito reduction).

2. Profound improvements in personal and socioeconomic well-being, such as vastly improved nutrition and increased dietary diversity, rising wages, less crowded housing with better ventilation (which increased exposure to sunlight and thus vitamin D production), the enactment of protective child and adult labor laws, public education, and greater public personal hygiene.

3. The abandonment of harmful medical practices, including treatments with mercury, arsenic, and strychnine, bloodletting and purging, and the “hot regimen,” cleared the way for more supportive care. Data strongly support the pivotal role of public health infrastructure. Research indicates that nearly 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality among American children occurred between 1900 and 1940, a period before the widespread availability of antibiotics and most vaccines. A parallel, even steeper decline—over 98%—was observed in England and Wales, underscoring that this was a widespread phenomenon driven by societal factors rather than specific medical interventions (and in fact far fewer medical interventions).

...nearly 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality among US children occurred [from 1900] before 1940, when few antibiotics or vaccines were available.

[“Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: Trends in the Health of Americans During the 20th Century,” Pediatrics, December 2000, pp. 1307-1317.]

Continue ReadingVaccines Arrived Only After the Massive Drop in Many Diseases

The COVID Vax “causes the heart muscle cells to produce a spike protein correct which is toxic to the body:

This conversation between Senator Ron Johnson and former head of the CDC, Robert Redfield, MD, highlights that the mRNA was synthetically produced to avoid degradation and can persist in the body for at least two months, contrary to initial claims. The spike protein produced by the mRNA is toxic and the lipid nanoparticles in the vaccine can bio-distribute throughout the body, including the brain and reproductive organs.

Transcript

Ron Johnson We were told it was going to stay in our arm, right? Okay? We were told this is mRNA was going to degrade rapidly in our body, right? But it wasn't mRNA. Was it? It was modified RNA. It was actually produced synthetically so it wouldn't degrade. And we now have studies that say the mRNA is circling the body at least, I think, two months, and we haven't done studies beyond that, correct? I know in your own practice, you don't administer that because you realize the spike protein is toxic to the body.

Robert Redfield I prefer the killed protein vaccines.

Ron Johnson When did you first determine, or when did you first find out about the bio distribution studies Pfizer had done, that the Japanese regulators released in February of 2021 regarding the lipid nanoparticles.

Robert Redfield Probably, probably somewhere in the in the spring or summer of 21 it was clear that the mRNA in some patients was persisting much longer than

Ron Johnson

But when did you find out about the bio distribution the lipid nanoparticle, particles, or When did people in the FDA? When should they have known about the fact that they were by distributing all over the body?

Robert Redfield Yeah, I don't know the answer to that. I was telling you the summer of 2021. Is when I probably came more aware that

Ron Johnson Only because the Japanese regulators released that. But again, this is part of the Pfizer studies. So they knew that the lipid nanoparticle, which is designed to permeate difficult-to-permeate barriers, correct. That's the design of the lipid nanoparticle. So they knew it was going to bio distribute all over the body, concentrate in the ovaries, the adrenal glands. It crosses the blood brain barrier, correct,

Robert Redfield correct.

Ron Johnson So what would, let's, let's just, again, you're a doctor, what happens when you have a lipid nanoparticle by distributing and let's say this mRNA, this modified mRNA, attaches to heart muscle. What is it injects itself into the cells, causes that heart muscle cell to produce a spike protein correct which is toxic to the body. And then, what does the body do?

Robert Redfield It has a very strong pro inflammatory response, which is problematic. Again, I think Senator, what you're getting at, which I'm 100% agreeing with you, is, I think there was not appropriate transparency from the beginning about the potential side effects of these vaccines. And I do think there was inappropriate decisions by some to try to under-report any side effects, because they argued that would make the public less likely to get vaccinated. I do think one of the greatest mistakes that was made, of course, was mandating these vaccines. They should have never been mandated. It should have been open to personal choice. They don't prevent infection. They do have side effects.

https://x.com/valerieanne1970/status/1999105905460187408?s=43

Continue ReadingThe COVID Vax “causes the heart muscle cells to produce a spike protein correct which is toxic to the body:

The News Media Used to Cover Vaccine Injuries

Once upon a time, the news media covered vaccine injuries.  Then they didn't.

"A Midwestern Doctor" has published a long article with the proof that the news media used to aggressively cover the dangers of vaccines.  The title: "Vaccine Amnesia: Why Did The Media Stop Covering Vaccine Disasters? Forgotten news segments show how widely acknowledged vaccine injuries were before the media was bought out by the pharmaceutical industry."

Bullet points from this article:

•Something about vaccines (e.g., their promise of a simple injection being sufficient to safely and effectively end all diseases) has always deeply appealed to the minds of government officials.

•Unfortunately, that promise is often a lie, so over and over, unsafe and ineffective vaccines enter the market. When this happens, the officials who are invested in them do everything they can to protect the vaccines from scrutiny and cover up each red flag that emerges and the medical field has dutifully complied.

•In previous decades, the press was much less corrupt than it is now and occasionally would air real investigations into what happened which highlighted the immense suffering many have faced.

•Collectively, these segments both show how much more candid the media used to be about the issues, and how closely many of the things discussed back then are exactly the same as the lies we face now.

•Since those TV programs made many who were suffering from the vaccine injuries realize they were not alone, this created a massive PR problem the vaccine industry, which was eventually solved by preventing any future segments from airing.

•This article was written in the hope that collective amnesia could be broken as we are now at the precipice of the pharmaceutical industry’s grip over the media being broken. For that reason, in this article, I compiled 54 news reports on the dangers of vaccination which have been almost entirely forgotten and would never be aired today.

Continue ReadingThe News Media Used to Cover Vaccine Injuries

Senator Ron Johnson: Federal Public Health Officials Hid the Dangers of the COVID Shot

"Senator Ron Johnson has now stated—on record—that federal health officials knowingly concealed vaccine risk signals instead of warning the public. His words were unambiguous: “They admitted there was a signal on myocarditis, and they hid it. They didn’t warn the public, they didn’t warn doctors.” Then he laid out the data straight from VAERS: “The VAERS system shows 38,742 deaths reported… and 9,252 of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination, or within one or two days.” He added that federal agencies initially promoted VAERS as a trusted safety surveillance system, until the results showed what they “didn’t like.”

Continue ReadingSenator Ron Johnson: Federal Public Health Officials Hid the Dangers of the COVID Shot