Jeffrey Tucker Describes the Bleak State of the World

Jeffrey Tucker has ambitiously taken the temperature of the political, economic and social world with an article titled: "The Coup, the Calamity, and the Conspiracy." I highly recommend a full read.

Tucker begins with this graphic:

Here is an excerpt:

[Y]ou could be more realistic and see that this was not a mistake at all. It was entirely intentional, the unfolding of a dark scheme hatched by an indescribably sadistic ruling class. Indeed, if this had all been an accident, we surely would have heard someone apologize by now.

There is also the planning involved. There was Event 201, the lesser-known Crimson Contagion, and many others. They are usually described in the mainstream press as rehearsals for unplanned contingencies, like resiliency training. Absurd. This was plotted far in advance. We have all the receipts. To realize this and connect the dots does not make you a conspiracy theorist. It makes you a person with the capacity to think.

To deny nefarious motives and schemes makes you impossibly naive to the point of sedation. At best, it makes you ill-read in history.

After five years, what can we say was the plan and purpose of this calamity? We all have our views. Certainly within Brownstone ranks, there are many opinions. We argue among ourselves all the time. Coming up with a clean and clear explanation is not easy because there are so many moving parts and so many industrial opportunists who took advantage of the crisis to cash out.

This is such an expansive article that resonated with me over and over.

I have many of the same concerns, but I won't say much here. I will say (as Tucker mentions in the early paragraphs) that I'm sure how well coordinated all of the powerful players are. Just because they are well-entrenched, monied and politically connected doesn't mean that they necessarily agree with each other day to day, much less year to year. But in my mind, there is definitely a hell of a lot of coordination.

The best solution to this horrific anti-Democratic mess is a vigorous, courageous and free press, but the powers-that-be know this deeply and they've got the formerly half-respectable "journalism" industry 95% locked down.

So in the meantime, it's Jeffrey Tucker, independent media and people like you and me doing what we can. It feels like a David and Goliath battle, especially when you see Trump kowtowing to Pfizer, just like Biden did and harris would have

Continue ReadingJeffrey Tucker Describes the Bleak State of the World

The Problem with Aluminum in Vaccines

How dangerous is it to have aluminum in our vaccines?  I've never heard it discussed until recently, when President Trump indicated that he would like to have aluminum removed from all vaccines.

Maryanne Demasi has written "A chat with 'Mr Aluminium': Trump’s Tylenol warning stole the headlines, but his vow to strip aluminum from vaccines was the real shock. I asked Dr Chris Exley—Mr Aluminium himself—what it would mean for the vaccine industry."

[Dr Chris Exley] has published over 200 peer-reviewed papers on the subject, showing how aluminium accumulates in the brain, how it is trafficked by immune cells, and how it may be implicated in conditions from Alzheimer’s disease to autism.

His 2018 paper revealed some of the highest levels of aluminium ever recorded in human brain tissue, including in children diagnosed with autism.

In the wake of Trump’s press conference, Exley argued that Tylenol exposure in pregnancy alone cannot explain severe, debilitating autism — and that this kind of brain damage is far more likely linked to infant exposure to aluminium in vaccines.

Exley has also been one of the most outspoken critics of the HPV vaccine Gardasil, warning that Merck’s novel aluminium adjuvant, amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS), is unusually potent, biologically reactive and unsafe.

His stance has made him a target, costing him funding and institutional support, but his voice remains central to any honest debate about aluminium and vaccines.

Who is Dr. Chris Exley? This, according to Grok:

Dr. Christopher Exley is an English chemist renowned for his extensive research on the health effects of aluminum exposure in humans. He specializes in bioinorganic chemistry, focusing on how aluminum interacts with biological systems and its potential links to neurological conditions.EducationExley earned his PhD from the University of Stirling in 1989. His doctoral thesis, supervised by J. D. Birchall, examined the amelioration of aluminum toxicity in Atlantic salmon, with a particular emphasis on aluminum-silicon interactions.CareerHe is a Professor of Bioinorganic Chemistry at Keele University, where he serves as the group leader of the Bioinorganic Chemistry Laboratory. In 1994, he received a Royal Society University Research Fellowship, supporting his early career work. As of 2025, he remains affiliated with Keele University and continues to lead research on aluminum through the university's dedicated resources. Exley is also active as a public communicator, maintaining a Substack newsletter ("Dr's Newsletter") where he discusses the bioinorganic chemistry of aluminum, with recent posts as late as July 2025.

For more about Exley's work, see his website.

Continue ReadingThe Problem with Aluminum in Vaccines

Three Types of Vaccines, Each with Their Risks

Bret Weinstein explains that there are three types of vaccines and none of them are completely safe.

Camus summarizes Weinstein's short presentation:

1. Live Attenuated Vaccines: The risk here is unpredictability and evolution. A virus weakened for one person may cause a serious infection in another. Crucially, it can revert to a pathogenic, transmissible form—a "contagious vaccine." The historical case of the oral polio vaccine causing numerous polio cases stands as a stark warning.

2. Inactivated Virus/Fragments (with Adjuvant): The problem is immune misdirection. A dead virus alone is unconvincing, requiring an "adjuvant"—a chemical alarm bell. This non-specific signal causes the immune system to "freak out," not just at the target antigen but at anything present, like pollen or gut bacteria. Indiscriminately triggering a systemic immune response is a dangerous gamble.

3. mRNA Technology: The danger is haphazard biodistribution. The mRNA instructions travel unpredictably, instructing cells anywhere in the body to produce the foreign antigen. The immune system then rightly identifies these cells as infected and attacks them. This random destruction of healthy tissue—for instance, in the heart—is an unacceptable and fundamentally unsafe mechanism.

Continue ReadingThree Types of Vaccines, Each with Their Risks

COVID Panic in 2025

Wow. And I know other people like this too.

Billy Binion:

I say this without snark: We underestimate how much the government's response to COVID truly broke some people. Many are left with persistent, crippling anxiety about just living daily life. It makes me sad. Some people also seem to really thrive—over 5 years later—off of the purpose & identity they get from being a COVID purist. It's very human to want to fight for something. But the world is not going to stop for you anymore. It is time to find a new cause.

Continue ReadingCOVID Panic in 2025

RFK, Jr. Describes Pharma World

RFK, Jr. described Pharma World:

It's between between Fauci (NIAID) and Gates (Gates Foundation) and Jeremy Farrar (WHO), who is up to his neck in Wuhan. They provide 64% of the biomedical research on the planet. If you are a young researcher, a scientist, a professor in a medical school, they have the capacity not only to make your career, but also to ruin it, and that's the way that they control not only the scientific studies that get done, but also the outcome of all those studies across the planet.

What Fauci has done--he's supposed to do, that kind of study. Instead what he does, he spends the bulk of his budget developing medications, which they then farm out to the university to do phase one, phase two and phase three trials. And the university could make $100 million in one of those trials, plus it gets royalty rights to the drug they're developing. Then, the NIAID takes royalty rights. University takes royalty rights. The principal investigator, who is the professor at the university who's running the clinical trial recruiting the, you know, the volunteers. He may get $15,000 a volunteer in grant money, and then he gets royalty rights, and then the pharmaceutical industry comes in for the phase three, and they then own the bulk of the patent, but they're sharing royalty rights with all these other players. So everybody is now corrupted. Everybody is making money on this drug, and the people who are supposed to be telling us "Was the drug actually benefit people, or is it just making money for Pharma?" Those people don't exist.

Continue ReadingRFK, Jr. Describes Pharma World