Epstein, Power, Money, Ubiquitous Corruption

We are being kept in the dark. We elect what is really a pretend government. The majority of the people calling the shots lurk in the shadows. We've always known that big donors and corporations have an outsize influence on our politicians, but it's much worse than we suspected. It's now clear that at least hundreds of rich and powerful people worked with Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of the US security state and the Israeli government. This has been true through many administrations, as evidenced by recently released documents connecting Jeffrey Epstein's power and money to the Clintons and to Obama's WH Attorney Kathryn Ruemmler. It involves many of the DNC's most powerful funders: Reid Hoffman, Glenn Dubin, Tom Pritzker, Leslie Wexner and Bill Gates. as well as some of Trump's highest-placed people, including Howard Lutnck, Steve Bannon, William Barr and Alan Dershowitz. It involves many hundreds of documented incidents where your voice as a citizen has been nullified. You did not vote for this corrupt and degenerate plutocracy. Nor will you ever be given the opportunity to get rid of it by any sort of vote. The people who have really been in charge don't care about you or me. They laugh at our Constitution.

And have you ever noticed how there are so many news media narratives that run counter to common sense? Those narratives are being driven by corrupt power and money.

I never thought I'd say this, but the U.S. government is more than corrupt. Our country has been completely occupied by unelected people (many of them operating through NGOs) who make many of the biggest decisions, including in the areas of domestic policy, public health, finance and foreign policy. In the area of foreign policy, we already knew this from years of US obeisance to the Israeli government's political arm, AIPAC, especially evidenced by our willingness to pour unlimited $ into wars at the direction of Israel. All of this has become distressingly more clear based on the recently released Epstein files. It is equally clear that we haven't yet seen the vast majority of the Epstein documentation. Most of Epstein's data has been meticulously and obediently redacted or withheld from U.S. Citizens by unknown people on behalf of their unknown bosses. See the post/video below (by Shadow of Ezra) for more on that.

An investigation has found that the Department of Justice has released just two percent of the material the FBI seized from Jeffrey Epstein’s properties.

The report says Epstein’s electronic devices, including computers, hard drives, and servers, are largely missing from the files made public.

It concludes that the three million and even six million figures shared with the public represent only a fraction of what authorities actually possess.

You might think that what I have written sounds crazy. I would agree with you that this sounds completely crazy. If you are brave and courageous, however, visit X, search for "Epstein" and start reading the who's who list of all the rich and famous people who have been exercising their political muscle in the shadows. The more you read, the more you will appreciate the courage of a handful of our elected representatives who know that we the citizens have a right to know what has been going on. Thank you to Thomas Massie, Ro Khanna, Lauren Boebert, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Nancy Mace, who led or supported the bipartisan discharge petition and legislation to compel the Justice Department to disclose the Epstein files.

Continue ReadingEpstein, Power, Money, Ubiquitous Corruption

Limited Hangout Week re Epstein “Disclosures”

If the phrase "limited hangout" is not yet part of your vocabulary, it's time to add it to your repertoire. Grok offers this definition:

A limited hangout is a strategy, often used in espionage, politics, or public relations, where a partial truth or selected information is disclosed to the public or investigators to prevent the discovery of more damaging or sensitive facts, effectively acting as a form of damage control when a full cover-up is no longer viable. The term originates from CIA jargon, as described by former official Victor Marchetti, who explained it as admitting "some of the truth when tight lips have slipped" but withholding the key details to mislead further inquiry.

Here is the only thing you can do to make sure you are not a victim of limited hangouts: Repeatedly ask: "What else have you not yet told me?" Ask this repeatedly, especially when dealing with people, government officials and corporate news outlets you have previously trusted. Consider these recent examples:

DOJ under Pam Bondi redacted a photo of Benjamin Netanyahu with Jeffrey Epstein from the files.

Redactions are admittedly an imperfect way of engaging in limited hangouts, but they work well enough often enough, given the limitations of human attention and memory.

DNC mega-donor Reid Hoffman was mentioned 2,600 times in the Epstein files. David Sachs: "The NYT story on Epstein & Silicon Valley has paragraphs on Elon, Peter Thiel … Reid Hoffman barely gets mentioned despite having the deepest Epstein relationship and having lied about it."

New York Times forgot to mention that one of its own reporters worked closely with Epstein well after Epstein was a known child sex trafficker. And see here.

The DOJ briefly uploaded — then removed — an 86-page document titled “Investigation into Potential Jeffrey Epstein Co-Conspirators.”

Amidst all the chaos, Rep Thomas Massie emerges: with some common sense:

Rep. Thomas Massie says he’s ready to use the nuclear option if the DOJ refuses to un-redact the names of Epstein’s clients. He warns he will simply start reading Epstein’s client names publicly if Pam Bondi’s Department of Justice does not release them. “If the victims want to give them to me, I’ve expressed that I’m willing to do that.” See also here.

Continue ReadingLimited Hangout Week re Epstein “Disclosures”

PSYOP Manual for the US Army

Like to see how the US Army planned to psychologically manipulate foreign populations? It might be especially interesting now that we know that these techniques have now been turned against Americans. Here's Robert Malone's short post along with a link to the army PSYOP manual.

What is a PSYOP? According to p. A3 of the manual:

1.5 PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS (PSYOP)

Psychological Operations are planned to convey selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of foreign governments, organizations, groups, and individuals. The purpose of PSYOP is to induce or reinforce foreign attitudes and behavior favorable to the originator's objectives.

I then asked Grok:

What types of psyop techniques described in this 1999 Army Psyop manual are being utilized by corporate media today to skew public understanding of what is going on in the world or how to think about it?

Grok's response:

Psyop Techniques from the 1999 Manual and Parallels in Corporate Media

The 1999 Joint Psychological Operations Task Force Headquarters Master Training Guide (CJCSM 3500.08) outlines frameworks for military psyop, focusing on influencing foreign audiences through planned information dissemination, analysis, and evaluation. While it's a military document (canceled in 2004), its principles—such as propaganda, deception, and target analysis—bear resemblance to strategies observed in corporate media today. Corporate media, including major networks and social platforms, often shapes public perception through selective framing, emotional appeals, and rapid narrative amplification, which can skew understanding of global events or issues like politics, economics, and social dynamics.

Below is a table summarizing key techniques from the manual, their descriptions, and observed parallels in modern corporate media. These parallels are drawn from analyses of media practices, including psychographic targeting, misinformation campaigns, and sentiment manipulation. Note that media entities may not intentionally label their actions as "psyop," but the effects align with the manual's methods. Claims are substantiated where possible from diverse sources, including academic studies, investigative reports, and public discourse, representing viewpoints from military, tech, and conspiracy-oriented perspectives.

Click "More" for Grok's table.

These techniques aim to induce favorable attitudes in the manual's context, but in media, they can skew understanding by prioritizing engagement over accuracy—e.g., dividing audiences ("us vs. them") or exploiting biases like Magruder's Principle (reinforcing pre-existing beliefs). Diverse sources note this in politics (e.g., election interference) and business (e.g., market manipulation), with X discussions highlighting perceived ops in everyday news. While not all media actions are deliberate psyops, the patterns enable narrative control at scale.

[More . . . ]

Continue ReadingPSYOP Manual for the US Army

Bill Gates, COVID, Epstein, Greed, Lying, Etc

No need for a lie detector on Bill  Gates.

"Abject Lie" is written on his forehead. Just dinner. "That's all." You might think my venom is due to his attempt to surreptitiously slip antibiotics to his wife after surreptitiously exposing her to venereal disease caused by his adventures with Jeffrey Epstein. No, that's merely the tip of the iceberg.

Sayer Ji lays it out. Go to Sayer Ji's article, "BREAKING: The Epstein Files Illuminate a 20-Year Architecture Behind Pandemics as a Business Model—With Bill Gates at the Center of the Network: Inside the JPMorgan–Gates–Epstein Pipeline: Donor-Advised Funds, Vaccine Finance, and the Architecture of Pre-Positioned Profit."

Also visit Ji's recent posts on X. Start here:

Dig into this post and the posts that follow for images of documents and links to many other documents that substantiate all of this).

We thought we have been electing the people who govern us, but George Carlin was so very correct when he said: "They own you," and he was speaking of the "Big Club," people like Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, people we did NOT elect and whom we would never have elected. Yet this is just one example (out of millions) of what corrupt people can do to mold a 'democracy" in their own image and likeness.  Eric Weinstein reacts:

Weinstein continues in the comments to his own post:

I have the same question as Weinstein. In his comment to his own post, Weinstein continues:

[More . . . ]

Continue ReadingBill Gates, COVID, Epstein, Greed, Lying, Etc