I follow Sayer Ji on X because he has been especially good at connecting the dots on the purported measles "emergency" closely. He has also drawn close comparisons to the government actions surrounding the COVID pandemic.

Are these government interventions really about disease? At first glance, that claim seems plausible. COVID and measles are really diseases, but the risks of these diseases are minuscule compared to many other pressing national priorities. Should society be worrying about two flu deaths, even if they were real deaths (especially one under the Biden administration 10 million or more bedded immigrants poured over the borders without regard to their vaccination, history or disease history). Even Anthony Fauci admitted that Covid was essentially as dangerous as the flu:

As he was going on comedy shows and testifying to Congress early on that Covid was “ten times deadlier than flu,” he actually co-published a scientific paper stating the opposite: Covid was about like a bad flu season."

What are these medical emergencies really about? The government is acting as a hyper-aggressive sales rep for the pharmaceutical industry. They want to force you to put vaccines in your arm, even if Pfizer only followed the participants of the clinical trials for two months before declaring the experimental vaccines to be safe and effective.  That problem, of course, pertains to Covid, but it is highly relevant given that it is an indication of the lack of credibility of Pharma.

Some people will question this, asking why one would question whether measles vaccines are critically necessary for all Americans. Of course, we are dealing with the average American, who has an extremely short attention span resulting from the lack of a rigorous education. As a nation, we have been proven incapable of running cost-benefit analyses. Consider first, that vaccines virtually nothing to do with the enormous decrease in measles death from 1900 to the present day:

[MORE . . . ]