Rediscovering Connection at your Local Park

The Internet is an amazing tool that offers us easy ways to connect with each other with very little effort. This magic technology also allows social media sites to pummel us with videos of people bullying each other and physically fighting each other in public places. The triggering "excuses" for these flare-ups are countless. It's often about masks, but many of these videos focus on the bizarre propensity of many people have to divide others into political and “racial” tribes.

In some of these videos people violently assault each other. I recently viewed a video of two families arguing on a store parking lot. Somebody apparently accidentally bumped somebody else, then the situation quickly and needlessly escalated to the point where guns were drawn. I cringe when I see this insanity. A couple of these disheartening videos show up on my feeds every week, posted by people whose motives are often unclear. Some of these videos involve police officers but the great majority do not. Often, every one of the people featured in the video is ill-behaved. Other videos involve unprovoked violence, however, and many of those incidents culminate in physical injuries to an innocent person. Watching too many of these videos plants a false intuition that we are watching typical human beings doing typical things.

Is there a silver lining to these displays of anger and violence? Is it important to sometimes document our human frailties and cruelties? Should we occasionally hold some of these videos up like mirrors to force ourselves to acknowledge the risk that our anger can dangerously escalate into brutality? Can we use some of these videos as teachable moments, showing what can happen when we fail to show restraint and kindness?

Even if there is such a silver lining, it can’t be healthy to watch a steady stream of these videos showing so many people being so shitty to each other. It seems to me that too much exposure to these videos numbs us to the pain and suffering of others. At some point, our in-group tendencies can completely anesthetize our empathy for "the other." Once we cross that line where we no longer care about the pain of others, these videos serve mostly as conflict pornography. For years, Hollywood has been peddling gratuitous violence as entertainment. Movie and TV studios too often stoop to the lowest level of profitable "entertainment." The proliferation of smartphone camera social media videos suggests that there’s no longer any need for Hollywood to continue paying highly trained writers substantial money to concoct their stylized ballets of violence.

In this age of COVID-19, many people are feeling trapped in their homes. Many of us are also transfixed to our screens on which we exposed to far too many videos of people acting badly. Slouching on the couch to watch strangers being mean to each other can’t be harmless. Aren’t these videos causing permanent social damage? And aren’t there better things to do with one's time?

Almost every day, I walk through glorious Tower Grove Park, near my home in St. Louis. On almost every walk I see people from many different demographic and ethnic groups. They show up in the park with their own styles of clothing, music, food, games and language, even now as the weather is turning colder. It is an especially beautiful thing to behold the families at play, parents and their little children. [More . . .]

Continue ReadingRediscovering Connection at your Local Park

Update on U.S. COVID Vaccines, Medical and Economic Issues

I walked away feeling notably enlightened after listening to one of my favorite podcast hosts, Steven Levitt (Co-Author of Freakonomics) interviewing Moncef Slaoui, the head of Operation Warp Speed (the U.S. COVID-19 vaccine program).  Highly recommended.   The show is called "People I Mostly Admire."  This episode was released on Dec 11, 2020.

Continue ReadingUpdate on U.S. COVID Vaccines, Medical and Economic Issues

Douglas Murray’s Message for College Students

At New Discourses, Calum Anderson notes that Douglas Murray is offering important ideas for our moment in time using incidents from several recent colleges to illustrate. The article is titled, "Why University Students Need to Listen to Douglas Murray." An excerpt:

As is the case with all truly interesting people, the least interesting thing about Douglas Murray is his sexuality. He has been a steadfast voice of reason during an age of unreason, and a formidable opponent of the woke activists who presume to speak of his behalf as an openly gay man . . . Murray specifically chastises employees at Penguin Random House for their attempt to prevent their employer from publishing Jordan Peterson’s upcoming book Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life. He calls the inability to listen to contrary points of view a “generational phenomenon” which has been adopted by children who believe that “speech is harm, and harm is not harm, that silence is violence and that violence is fine.” Murray was addressing my generation, and despite what may be regarded as a sweeping generalization I am not the least bit offended. Not every twenty-something thinks this way, but the most vocal among us do and that is a serious problem: “the best lack all conviction while the worst are full of passionate intensity” (Yeats).

Continue ReadingDouglas Murray’s Message for College Students

Jordan Peterson’s Patience and Return

I had seen this interview before, but I happened on it again tonight.  If you've never seen it, you might agree that it's quite a spectacle--more than 25 millions viewers are evidence of that. Cathy Newman (of Channel 4 of a British TV show) is interviewing Jordan Peterson in 2018. This is intense and it goes on and on. I'm tempted to say that Newman violated every one of Heterodox Academy's suggestions for how to have a civil conversation. This is not a conversation, but it makes for some extraordinary theater. Newman entered the studio to school Peterson.  She put on a clinic in strawman argument. And after several of the most painful minutes, she still didn't seem to have the faintest clue about the meaning of "multivariate analysis" and its relevance to many of her questions.

Newman's main technique was to misstate Peterson's position, requiring Peterson to dig out, over and over, which he does with saintly patience. Toward the end, the attacks turn purely ad hominem and then it's finally over. This interview was a precursor to what has increasingly become a commonplace "interview" in 2020. Interviews are now too often gotcha matches based upon false accusations. When this happens, the advantage usually goes to the unfair interviewer because if the successfully defends the attack, the interviewer just moves on to another attack based on new falsities. There is an unfair disparity throughout these conversations, because it normally takes a lot longer to repair a false accusation than to make one. That said, Peterson patiently and swiftly swats these false accusations away, leading to ever new accusations.

I'm not entirely certain that I have yet distilled all of the take-home lessons here, but I watched the whole thing tonight, finding it impossible to click away to some other website. After it was all over, I found myself nodding in agreement with many of the comments, such as these:

Jordan: Hitler was evil

Cathy: So your saying you supported the Nazis? --

“Let me get this straight, you're saying we should organise our hierarchy like lobsters”

--

Jordan Peterson: "I like ice cream" Cathy Newman: "So you're saying we should stop making yoghurt?"

--

Kathy Newman's greatest life accomplishment is probably introducing millions to Jordan Peterson.

--

I have recently read that Jordan Peterson is again entering public life after a long bout with illness.  In the following short video, he explains what he has been going through.

Continue ReadingJordan Peterson’s Patience and Return