Ed Dowd, former analyst with BlackRock, testifies before Congress about his findings of excess deaths and disabilities since the introduction of the COVID vax. In addition to vaccine safety, he raises urgent questions about U.S. nonchalance in light or this data:
The solution had never undergone human trials prior to 2020, and it was approved under an EUA in late 2020 within record time for a vaccine and a noticeably short trial period. The government deemed these products safe and effective and told the nation they would prevent you from getting and transmitting COVID-19. These statements have since been proven false. It has become clear that the U.S. government, along with the health regulators, do not desire an honest accounting of these policies that were imposed mostly under federal mandates. I will predominantly focus on the human and economic costs since the beginning of 2021, which if they were favorable to the current regime, you would be hearing them scream these results from the rooftops.
When analyzing the excess death human costs, it's interesting to note that in 2020, there were approximately 458,000 excess deaths, of which 73% were age 65 and older, and 15 to 64 comprising just 27%. Note, we were told in 2020 that the COVID-19 risk of death was primarily in the older populations. However, in 2021, with the rollout of the, quote unquote, safe and effective vaccine, there were approximately another 500,000 excess deaths but a mixed shift had occurred from older to younger. In 2021, the 65 plus age category was 57%. Remember it was 73% in 2020 of the total, while the 15 to 64 cohort increased to 43%. The absolute excess death increased from 20 to 21 for the productive working age 15 to 64 was 73%. So in 2020, 124,000 people perished excessively. and then in 2021 it rose to 215,000, 73%. For a virus that kills old people, this makeshift is an epic failure for the so-called vaccine solution. The total excess deaths since the rollout of the vaccine in the US, including 21, 22, and 23, is approximately 1.1 million. ...
The blame of the vaccine could be put to rest if studies were conducted of vaccinated versus unvaccinated individuals. Independently of whether it's the vaccine or not, as a nation we should all collectively want to know what is actually causing these tragic health results. However, the silence by the health authorities and the U.S. government strongly suggest they know the answer to that question.
See this additional article regarding Dowd's findings regarding worldwide excess deaths.
Hepatitis B can only be transmitted sexually or by needles, yet the CDC insists that it is needed by newborn babies. What safety tests were run on the Hepatitis B vaccine by the manufacturer before it was released for children (including infants)? Only 147 children were injected and they were followed for only 5 days. There are so very many problems with this "testing," as explained by attorney Aaron Siri and Del Bigtree. Here is an excerpt:
Aaron Siri and Del Bigtree about hepatitis B vaccine: "Let's say you have a 1 in 200 issue, right? Let's say a 1 in 200, which would be very high. If we talk about like vaccine injury, they'll say, oh, it's 1 in a million. Well, let's just say it's like 1 in 200. If you only have 150 children in a study, you may not even see that issue, right?
Isn't that sort of like? Yeah, that's ridiculous. No clinical trial would ever have 150 children. Right, I mean. That's, you know what that sounds like, Del? That sounds like an anti-vaccine conspiracy theory. You're right, you're right. That's what it sounds like. We don't wanna do that. Yep. So how many people were in this study? Oh, it was 147. Yeah.
Let's go through it. It's one of my favorite things to do in depositions when I depose pediatricians, I'll ask. So tell me some of the false things you've heard about vaccines. What are those folks, got issued vaccines, saying? I just let them go and it's amazing how many times, many things they say are true. Right. And, you know, and that's... So they'll say that we haven't done proper safety studies.
Really, they've said that, huh? Like, how long would be a proper safety study, right? I could tell you some very interesting ones, but I don't want to digress. In three clinical studies, and here it is, here's the sentence summarizing by the FDA, you know, it's written by the company, approved by the FDA, summarized in clinical trial, relied upon to license for Comvax HB before it was injected into millions of babies. Here it is.
In three clinical studies, 434 doses of RecomVax HP5 micrograms were administered to 147 healthy infants and children up to 10 years of age who were monitored for five days after each dose. If I would have told anybody that, they would have said I'm crazy. There's no way. They tell us that they properly study these vaccines before they go on the market. They are robustly, the most thoroughly and robust study products ever.
But there it was, black and white, on the FDA website. So let's go through the three variables. First, what was the control? None listed. Meaning, what was the group that didn't get it that you compared them to track them for the same four days five days five days and said well look you had more fevers or more headaches or how much you'd see in five days you know but did the group that didn't get it got the placebo did they have the same amount of any those things obviously five days.
The Washington Post is concerned that the new public health officials are untested, failing to mention that the Biden public health officials got almost everything wrong about COVID, often lying to us and covering up their lies and missteps ever since. Excerpt:
Some health experts worry that those poised to assume prominent positions have gone too far in criticizing the pandemic response. “When we get into another firefight with a microbe, we need all hands on deck, and we need the best science and the best public health practice to come forward,” said Michael T. Osterholm, a University of Minnesota infectious-disease expert who advised President Joe Biden’s transition team. “I’m not confident at this point that this administration can do that.”
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on How Bill Gates Made 242 Million in Pfizer Stock Scheme:"And the last one of these was in 2020 or 2019 in October. And it was hosted by Bill Gates, I. Fauci and by Avril Haines. I'm sure a lot of you have gone and looked at this on YouTube, it's called Event 201. That same week, Bill Gates, who was overseeing this simulation, made about 1.1 million shares of BioNTech vaccine, which later became the Pfizer vaccine."
"He then sold that, almost all that stock, 87%, two years later, at a $242 million profit. And a week after that, he publicly announced the vaccine didn't work. This is what you call a pump and dump scheme."
"Because he was the guy who was on TV with his minion, Peter Hotez, who took $52 million from Gates for his, Gates made his institution. So you had the pair of them pumping up this stock for two years and then dumping it a week before he goes on TV and says, oh, it didn't work after all."
That's not all. Kennedy:
"Gates practices philanthrocapitalism. "You use philanthropy to make yourself rich and you use it strategically. He's gotten control over the WHO so that they mandate vaccines all over the world and the companies that make those vaccines are where Gates & others are shareholders."
I would like to see Gates thoroughly investigated. It's not possible to get virtually EVERYTHING wrong about COVID wrong without large amounts of bad faith money pulling the levers. https://x.com/VerseCannon/status/1832333692796326002
Jillian Michaels, who has gone from ‘having vaxxed the shit out of my children’ to exposing the lack of testing of the Hep B shot to Piers Morgan:
[RFK, Jr. insists on using the] gold standard research when it comes to vaccines and drugs, but particularly vaccines, because the research on those is not up to par. And I'm going to give you a perfect example. He wants randomized human randomized control trials. So if you look at hepatitis B, which is one of the most controversial vaccines for kids, because it's specifically for people who have risky sex and use needles, and you can test the mother to find out if she's negative before you vaccinate the newborn. So why does a child even need this?Well, ironically, after the drug companies were given blanket immunity in 1986 they added 48 more doses of vaccinations to the schedule. But let's look at hep B. What are the clinical trials that it goes through? I think your mind is going to be blown, and I encourage everybody to look this up. It's on the FDA website. They tested 147 kids in three trials, and they monitor them for five days. Does that seem
up to par? I don't think so. And then the second thing, and by the way, I can give you a million other examples, just like this one.
And the third thing is, he was tasked with dramatically improving the health of Americans. And in case everybody's missed it, we're on healthier than ever. 74% of adults are overweight or obese. We heard the diatribe all run through it one more time. We're more infertile than ever. Infertility rates are going up 1% every year. Autism, one in 34 kids. It was like one in 10,000 when I was a child. I mean, we could go on and on and on. Does rock bottom have a basement? I don't think so. There's a loophole in the FDA that lets 10,000 chemicals into our food, 9000 of which are banned in every other country of the developing world. I mean, my God, really, I think what you're seeing here is the absolute panic of big food, big farming, Big Pharma and big insurance, and for good reason, because it's absolutely corrupt. And I, for one, am so excited about this and I will do everything to help get this guy confirmed.