What Public Health Did that was not Forgivable

Dr. Martin Kulldorff, who was fired by Harvard for telling the truth (and who has still not been rehired):

More on Kulldorff's firing by Harvard. Excerpt:

On March 10, 2020, before any government prompting, Harvard declared that it would “suspend in-person classes and shift to online learning.” Across the country, universities, schools, and state governments followed Harvard’s lead.

Yet it was clear, from early 2020, that the virus would eventually spread across the globe, and that it would be futile to try to suppress it with lockdowns. It was also clear that lockdowns would inflict enormous collateral damage, not only on education but also on public health, including treatment for cancer, cardiovascular disease, and mental health. We will be dealing with the harm done for decades. Our children, the elderly, the middle class, the working class, and the poor around the world—all will suffer.

Schools closed in many other countries, too, but under heavy international criticism, Sweden kept its schools and daycares open for its 1.8 million children, ages one to 15. Why? While anyone can get infected, we have known since early 2020 that more than a thousandfold difference in Covid mortality risk holds between the young and the old. Children faced minuscule risk from Covid, and interrupting their education would disadvantage them for life, especially those whose families could not afford private schools, pod schools, or tutors, or to homeschool . . .

Every honest person knows that new drugs and vaccines come with potential risks that are unknown when approved. This was a risk worth taking for older people at high risk of Covid mortality—but not for children, who have a minuscule risk for Covid mortality, nor for those who already had infection-acquired immunity. To a question about this on Twitter in 2021, I responded:

Thinking that everyone must be vaccinated is as scientifically flawed as thinking that nobody should. COVID vaccines are important for older high-risk people and their care-takers. Those with prior natural infection do not need it. Nor children.

If Harvard and its hospitals want to be credible scientific institutions, they should rehire those of us they fired ...

Most Harvard faculty diligently pursue truth in a wide variety of fields, but Veritas has not been the guiding principle of Harvard leaders. Nor have academic freedom, intellectual curiosity, independence from external forces, or concern for ordinary people guided their decisions.

Harvard and the wider scientific community have much work to do to deserve and regain public trust.

Continue ReadingWhat Public Health Did that was not Forgivable

The Health State of the Nation

I'm currently reading Good Energy, a new excellent and horrifying book by Dr. Casey Means. Dr. Casey Means:

"I learned virtually nothing at Stanford Medical School about the tens of thousands of scientific papers that elucidate the root causes of why American health is plummeting.”

“I did not learn that for each additional serving of ultra-processed food we eat, early mortality increases by 18%.

This now makes up 67% of the foods our kids are eating. I took zero nutrition courses in medical school.

I didn’t learn that 82% of independently-funded studies show harm from processed food, while 93% of industry-sponsored studies reflect no harm.

I didn’t learn that 95% of the people who created the recent USDA food guidelines for America had significant conflicts of interest with the food industry.

I did not learn that one billion pounds of synthetic pesticides are being sprayed on our foods every single year. 99% of the farmland in the United States is sprayed with synthetic pesticides, many from China and Germany, and these invisible, tasteless chemicals are strongly linked to autism, ADHD, sex hormone disruption, thyroid disease, sperm dysfunction, Alzheimer’s, dementia, birth defects, cancer, obesity, liver dysfunction, female infertility and more.

I did not learn that the eight billion tons of plastic that have been produced just in the last 100 years … are being broken down into microplastics that are now filling our food, our water, and we are now even inhaling them in our air, and that very recent research … tells us that now about 0.5% of our brains by weight are plastic.

I didn’t learn that there are more than 80,000 toxins that have entered our food, water, air, and homes by industry, many of which are banned in Europe, and they are known to alter our gene expression, alter our microbiome composition and the lining of our gut, and disrupt our hormones.

I didn’t learn that heavy metals like aluminum and lead are present in our food, our baby formula, personal care products, our soil, and many of the mandated medications like vaccines, and that these metals are neurotoxic and inflammatory.

I didn’t learn that the average American walks a paltry 3,500 steps per day even though we know, based on science and top journals, that simply walking 7,000 steps a day slashes by 40-60% our risk of Alzheimer’s, dementia, type 2 diabetes, cancer, and obesity.

I certainly did not learn that medical error and medications are the third-leading cause of death in the US.

I didn’t learn that just five nights of sleep deprivation can induce full-blown pre-diabetes. I learned nothing about sleep, and we’re getting about 20% less sleep on average than we were 100 years ago.

I didn’t learn that American children are getting less time outdoors now than a maximum security prisoner, and on average, adults spend 93% of their time indoors, even though we know from the science that separation from sunlight destroys our circadian biology, and circadian biology dictated our cellular biology.

I didn’t learn that professional organizations that we get out practice guidelines from, like the American Diabetes Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics, have taken tens of millions of dollars from Coke, Cadbury, processed food companies and vaccine manufacturers like Moderna.

I didn’t learn that if you address these root causes that all lead to metabolic dysfunction and help patients change their food and lifestyle patterns … we could reverse the chronic disease crisis in America, save millions of lives and trillions of dollars in healthcare costs per year.

This is a spiritual crisis. We are choosing death over life, we are choosing darkness over light.

We need a return to courage. We need a return to common sense and intuition. We need a return to awe for the sheer miraculousness of our lives.

We need all hands on deck."

Source: Sen. Ron Johnson’s Roundtable on “American Health and Nutrition: A Second Opinion”

Continue ReadingThe Health State of the Nation

Increasing Willingness to Miss Out

Freya India has noticed that people are increasing afraid to participate in real life. Over the past decade, I have also personally noticed this change in both teenagers and adults. Here's an excerpt from India's article:

When talking about the harms of social media today, one of the first problems people mention is FOMO—fear of missing out. Scroll through Instagram and see your friends having fun at a party you weren’t invited to. Check Snapchat to find everyone’s Bitmojis together on Snap Map without you. This feeling of constantly missing out, we’re told, is a major cause of anxiety and depression for Gen Z.

But I don’t believe that’s true anymore.

More often, I see the opposite. Social media doesn’t make Gen Z afraid to miss out; it makes us want to miss out. We want to avoid the risk, the rejection, the awkwardness, the effort and energy that the real world demands. Our major problem isn’t fear of missing out. It’s fear of taking part.

Look at how many young people are scared of doing everyday things. I don’t just mean fear of learning to drive, or getting a job—I mean scared to order in restaurants. Can’t walk into a cafe. Don’t want to open their door for a delivery. Under the hashtag #socialanxiety on TikTok, which has nearly 3 billion views, young people are sharing symptoms, describing debilitating anxiety, even recording their panic attacks in public. One British TikToker hosts a series called “Doing Things You’re Afraid of To Show You It’s Okay”, where she films herself facing challenges like getting in an elevator, asking for help in a supermarket, and asking for directions.

Continue ReadingIncreasing Willingness to Miss Out

What is Autism?

I walk around assuming I know what autism is, but whenever the topic arises, I am hard-pressed to define it. I found this video to be helpful: Peter Boghossian inverviewing Jill Escher:

I transcribed part of the interview:

PB:

First of all, who are you? How did you get into it? . . .

JE:

Sure. Well, thanks so much for having me and and for addressing this really important subject that even your son knows something about. So I'm Jill Escher. I wear a bunch of hats in the autism world. Most importantly, I'm the mother to two children with severe non verbal autism. Johnny's now 25 and Sophie is 18. I have another son as well, who's 27 but he's not diagnosed with autism. And over the years, I've become increasingly involved in the autism community on many, many levels. Right now, I serve as president of the National Council on severe autism, which, as the name implies, is a national advocacy group. I been president of Autism Society San Francisco Bay Area, and I'm still on that board, and I'm I run a philanthropy called Escher fund for autism that funds and promotes autism research, especially in the realm of causation and some other things too. But that's enough.

PB

What is it?

JE

Maybe we'll start there and then go into prevalence. What autism is is a very sticky, tricky question, but generally, what it refers to is a bunch of different characteristics and traits that kind of hang together in a kind of syndrome, like way, but it's not a syndrome, so it's classically defined in the DSM five as really two co occurring traits. One is abnormal social communication and the other is repetitive behaviors. And those can occur in many ways and to many different degrees, which is why we see all this heterogeneity. But in addition to what you see in the DSM V, there are a lot of other things that tend to cluster, you know, with autism. For example, sensory sensitivity. Like, you know, my kids are constantly plugging their ears. I have to put headphones on them. For example, anxiety, and my son suffers a ton of anxiety, which can become incredibly explosive. Other things such as difficulty learning, in flexibility in behaviors, lack of abstract thought is really another kind of foundational part of autism. So it's really a lot of different things, and they tend to hang together. And for lack of having a better diagnosis. Clinicians slap autism on a bunch of different presentations, clinical presentations that have these combined to one degree or another and with different traits.

PB

So you've you've written that the prevalence of autism is increasing, and so I was wondering if it's possible the diagnostic criteria changing or expanding, rather than the rates of autism increasing, right?

JE

So that seems to be one of the most fundamental debates in autism. Are the rates truly increasing of this psychopathology, of this neurodevelopmental disorder, or are we just changing the diagnostic criteria to encompass a greater number of children? And I strongly argue that it is the former that we are actually seeing a very dramatic, very obvious increase in neurodevelopmental pathology among children in the US,

PB

just, yeah, I was just gonna say cross culturally, or

JE

In the industrialized countries, that where we've done this epidemiological work, it's very evidence that evident, that this is true, even when we hold the definition constant, right, Even if we're looking at the objectively same criteria for inclusion, we see these dramatic increases. I can give you one example here. I'm in California, and we keep very good data on our developmental disability population. We've done so for decades, really, since the 60s and 70s, because we have a specific legislation that their states don't have. But what we've seen, for example, is an increase in autism in our developmental services system, which only serves the more severe portion of the autism population, from about 3,000 in the mid 1980s to over 180,000 today. Right? And that is obviously increasing at a rate much higher than the general background population increase. When we look at the CDC data again, they're holding the case definition constant and other other federal. Role data, we see an increase from less than 1% 20 years ago to about 3% today. So this is, and I can cite, dozens of studies across from epidemiology to education to social services to other forms of data that we see from, for example, hospital systems, the same exponential curve, even when we're holding the case definition constant. Now that's not to say there isn't also an increase, especially in that very high functioning level that we're including that wasn't included before. I will also say that is true. So I think both are true. But what's so alarming is that even rates of the more profoundly impacting autism has increased,

PB

so that causally, that the reasonable person can infer fact, the inference would have to be that it's environmental,

JE

yes, so I would argue that this raises very important, urgent questions about what might be raising these rates of abnormal neurodevelopment. Because what autism essentially is, I talked about the behaviors and how it manifests, but what it is on the inside is abnormalities and dysregulation of early brain development, starting when the baby is a fetus, mid gestation, when the brain when the neurons are being born and they're growing and they're proliferating and they're migrating and creating the brain and what we've seen in the field of neuroscience is very, very strong evidence that autism, for the most part, there are exceptions, of course, but for the most part, is the result of Abner, abnormal and dysregulated early brain development. So what is causing that? That is the $64 billion question in autism today. . . if we're going to talk about neuroscience, your autism is complex, and they find, you know, different parts of the brain are affected differently in different people. There's not one thing, but there is one. If there is one bottom line, it is in the cerebral cortex, especially with the frontal cortex, they find abnormalities in how the layers of the cortex are formed and how those neurons connect and how those synapses work. Now, I don't know. I mean, we probably don't want to get too deep into neuroscience. This is not a science podcast, but I would start there when we think about what's happening with autism and how it develops early in utero, and how that relates to as I said, you know, there's these dysregulations that could be genetic, but could also have other causes as well.

PB

Now you use the word before, and then I have a few questions that are just pounding out of my brain that I have to discharge, but you use the term before disorder? Yeah, and I know that that is not that must not be without controversy.

JE

So language has been highly controversial in autism, as it has been in other areas of the culture war. So autism has been caught up in the culture war, just like so many other things, and it's been really unfortunate, in my view, because I don't think autism is a culture war question. I think autism is a question of, you know, pathology, you know, of neuropathology, and how we address that scientifically, and how we deal with it in terms of policy. Of course, everybody wants the best for our children with autism. I certainly want the best for my children. I want the best for our community. I literally spend hours every day serving our community to make sure our kids are included to the extent possible, that they get access to the best programs possible, the best therapies possible, can live the best lives possible. I'm on board without 100% what I'm not on board with is this kind of systemic trivialization of autism, which is a what you see in the scientific literature, which you see in the neurodiversity movement, where they're trying to wipe away words like disorder, like risk, like, oh gosh, there's, there's so many of them. We're not allowed to talk about, you the severe behaviors of our children. We're not allowed to talk about the aggression. The property destruction, the self injury, the elopement, you know, the pica, like my daughter does, the ingestion of inedible objects. You know, these things, apparently we're not allowed to talk about because they cause stigma. Well, okay, autism itself is not stigmatizing. That's not stigma comes from something else, other than an essential part of your disorder, right? Stigma comes from, you know, society or individuals, you know, deciding that you are lesser than Well, that's a secondary question, but we're what a lot of the neurodiversity advocates in academia, really entrenched in academia, are trying to do is kind of obliterate the vocabulary of autism, so that we only have these neutral terms left. And those neutral terms do not adequately describe people like my son, my son Johnny, who's 25 and nonverbal, has a functional level of probably an 18 month old, if that, probably less than that, maybe more like a 12 month old. He can't really do anything for himself. He can't dress himself. He can't prepare food, he can't take care of his own hygiene. He can't read, he can't write, he can't talk. He can't use a phone. He can't functionally operate anything he before he was on the right medication.

Continue ReadingWhat is Autism?

Video Synopsis of Jonathan Haidt’s Newest Book: “The Anxious Generation”

Jonathan Haidt's newest book, The Anxious Generation, is out. I bought a copy but haven't read it (though I've watched several interview of Haidt and he makes a compelling case). The statistics are sobering:

Here's a 7-minute video synopsis of Haidt's book to whet your appetite:

Continue ReadingVideo Synopsis of Jonathan Haidt’s Newest Book: “The Anxious Generation”