Meaningful conversations regarding potential dangers of the COVID "vaccination" continue to be censored.
The journal Cureus on Monday retracted the first peer-reviewed paper to provide an extensive analysis of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine trial data and post-injection injuries. The authors of the paper also called for a global moratorium on the vaccines.
Here are at least a dozen major issues relating to COVID that corporate media outlets are actively refusing to discuss. The US govt has actively worked to keep you from discussing these issues on social media. I don't claim to know the answers, but I desperately want to hear these topics vigorously discussed.
From today's TGIF by Nellie Bowles:
We never meant to imply college kids weren’t brilliant: A study out of Mount Royal University in Canada has found college kids aren’t smarter than the average person of their age anymore. Paper title: “Meta-analysis: On average, undergraduate students’ intelligence is merely average.” See, college kids used to be smarter than the general population, when going into higher education was more of a selective thing. But now that so many people go to college, they’re all just intellectually normal. Which you could easily argue is great: More college for more kids! The paper was accepted for publication in Frontiers in Psychology Cognitive Science. But then the commentary class heard about it, and they did not like this one bit. There was outrage! Are you calling us. . . average? The commentary class may be for equity in theory but in practice they need to be told early and often that they are superior. Not average, which is violence, technically. And so the paper was pulled. I’m completely serious that the reason is: Reviewers felt that saying college kids now are “merely” average is “demeaning.” Everyone gets a trophy. And everyone is above average.
The next time you get pissed at the alleged "Russian Interference" in U.S. elections, keep in mind the dozens and dozens of time the United States has blatantly interfered with the democratic process in other countries. Wikipedia offers synopses of many of these U.S. transgressions. Here's the opening paragraph:
Since the 19th century, the United States government has participated and interfered, both overtly and covertly, in the replacement of many foreign governments. In the latter half of the 19th century, the U.S. government initiated actions for regime change mainly in Latin America and the southwest Pacific, including the Spanish–American and Philippine–American wars. At the onset of the 20th century, the United States shaped or installed governments in many countries around the world, including neighbors Hawaii, Panama, Honduras, Nicaragua, Mexico, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic.
And here's yet another Wikipedia article with more information about the U.S. interfering in the elections of other countries.
Wikipedia has become severely compromised on numerous topics (see the interview below, Glenn Greenwald interviewing Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger), but these particular pages still seem largely intact.
Corporate news outlets never discuss the insatiable U.S. War Machine and the ubiquitous U.S. government propaganda. U.S. warmongering benefits only a tiny # of rich elites and results in senseless destruction overseas, to U.S. citizens and to the U.S. economy.
