“Rumors” as the Newest Censorship Tool

If you read this NYT article, you will immediately see an incredibly severe attack of lack of curiosity. An Irish riot was caused by "rumors" that three Irish children and an Irish woman were wounded by an Algerian migrant wielding a knife. An excerpt from this NYT article:

Soon after three children and a woman were wounded in a knife attack outside a Dublin school on Thursday, rumors about the perpetrator’s nationality began to proliferate online.

The Garda Síochána, the Irish police force, declined to comment on the background of the suspect, who was taken into custody after being tackled to the ground by bystanders. The police said only that he is a man in his 50s.

The NYT repeatedly discusses the "rumors" and "unconfirmed reports" without answering a simple obvious question: Was the attacker an Algerian migrant? This information would seemingly be simple to figure out and it is central to the story that a "riot" ensued and included people carrying banners reading "Irish Lives Matters." The NYT bluntly claims that these protestors were part of "anti-immigration and far-right groups."

Again, was the assailant an Algerian migrant? Also, what is the basis for calling the protestors "anti-immigration" and "far right"? Are they truly opposed to all immigration? On what basis are the on the "right" (and see this recent post on the myth of left and right politics).

Until the NYT takes the time to answer whether the assailant is an Algerian migrant, how can the NYT conclude that this idea is a "rumor." Mike Benz has the answer: Calling real facts and real concerns "rumors" is the most recent tactic for censorship. The bad people in this story are the Irish people concerned with safety. They need to be censored:

What is the long term solution for the very real problem that Irish people are concerned about immigration policies that lead to violence? Those Irish people need to be censored. The Irish Government is not wasting any time to enact emergency legislation:

The Washington Post used a similar tactic, as skewered by this tweet:

Continue Reading“Rumors” as the Newest Censorship Tool

Corporate/Government Propaganda: A Tutorial

Robert Malone cites the work of Paul D. Thacker, who describes how powerful entities such as corporations and governments deceive us through propaganda. It was a technique developed by cigarette companies and it has been used ever since, including by COVID grifters. Here's an excerpt:

In December 1953, the CEOs of America’s leading tobacco companies cast aside competitive rancor and gathered at New York City’s Plaza Hotel to confront a menace to their incredibly profitable industry. An emergent body of science published in elite medical journals cast doubt on the safety of cigarettes and threatened to destroy a half-century of corporate success. Joining them at the Plaza was John W. Hill, the president of America’s top public relations firm, Hill & Knowlton. Hill would later prove a decisive savior.

Hill had closely studied Edward Bernays, whose work on propaganda in the 1920s and 1930s laid the foundation of modern public relations and defined common techniques to manipulate popular opinion. Hill understood that any traditional campaign would fail to sway society, which perceived advertising as little more than corporate propaganda. Effective public relations required comprehensive off-stage management of the media. At its best, it left no fingerprints.

Instead of ignoring or denigrating new data that found tobacco dangerous, Hill proposed the opposite: embrace science, trumpet new data, and demand more, not less research. By calling for more research, which they would then fund, tobacco companies could harness academic scientists in a battle to confront a major scientific controversy and amplify skeptical views of the relationship between tobacco and disease. Such a scheme would let companies shroud themselves in doubt and uncertainty—core principles of the scientific process, in which every answer leads to new questions.

Hill & Knowlton’s campaign for the five largest US tobacco companies corrupted science and medicine for decades to follow, laying the foundation for financial conflicts of interest in science, as other industries mimicked tobacco’s techniques to protect their own products from government bans and regulations—later, from consumer lawsuits. While tactics have varied over time, the core strategy has changed little since tobacco wrote the playbook, providing a menu of techniques now employed across industries.

Continue ReadingCorporate/Government Propaganda: A Tutorial

It’s Time to Release All Records Regarding the Assassination of John F. Kennedy

What are they (still) trying to hide? Apparently keeping these records hidden is something Trump and Biden agree on. It's time to reveal those thousands of pages of records about this momentous event that occurred 70 years ago.

Continue ReadingIt’s Time to Release All Records Regarding the Assassination of John F. Kennedy

Forget About the Last War – It’s Time to Get Excited about the Next War

Many of the people who read this cheer-led the Ukraine war, decorating their timelines, homes and cars with gold and blue flags. Do they feel betrayed by the corporate media yet? Do they understand how you've been played by Iraq neocons (including Joe Biden, Anthony Blinken and Victoria Nuland)? We're off to the next war, once again, leaving devastated families (Russian and Ukrainian) and cities in our wake. Not giving a shit and none the wiser. In the meantime, the corporate news doubles down on bomb holing. 

Continue ReadingForget About the Last War – It’s Time to Get Excited about the Next War