I've long-admired Matt Tabbi's thought-process and writing style. This week at Rolling Stone, Tabbi weighs in on what he thinks is really going down in Washington DC and on Wall Street:

People are pissed off about this financial crisis, and about this bailout, but they're not pissed off enough. The reality is that the worldwide economic meltdown and the bailout that followed were together a kind of revolution, a coup d'état. They cemented and formalized a political trend that has been snowballing for decades: the gradual takeover of the government by a small class of connected insiders, who used money to control elections, buy influence and systematically weaken financial regulations. The crisis was the coup de grâce: Given virtually free rein over the economy, these same insiders first wrecked the financial world, then cunningly granted themselves nearly unlimited emergency powers to clean up their own mess . . . .

The mistake most people make in looking at the financial crisis is thinking of it in terms of money, a habit that might lead you to look at the unfolding mess as a huge bonus-killing downer for the Wall Street class. But if you look at it in purely Machiavellian terms, what you see is a colossal power grab that threatens to turn the federal government into a kind of giant Enron — a huge, impenetrable black box filled with self-dealing insiders whose scheme is the securing of individual profits at the expense of an ocean of unwitting involuntary shareholders, previously known as taxpayers.

In the process of writing this article, Tabbi shows no mercy for AIG or any other company dabbling in CDO's (collateralized-debt obligations) or CDS's (credit-default swaps). This feels right to me: Showing no mercy to those who dabbled in speculative financial instruments as if they were conservative investments. After all, those financial "gurus" who made these decisions were highly educated people with legions of financial and accounting experts working for them. They should have known better. They have no excuses. Nor does the federal government have excuses. Case in point: Who was regulating AIG? One inept guy.

Among other things, the GAO report noted that the entire OTS had only one insurance specialist on staff — and this despite the fact that it was the primary regulator for the world's largest insurer!

I don't know enough about economics to really weigh in on this crisis. I am highly suspicious about the need for these "bailouts," however. I do know that this money is already gone and that there is almost no accountability for the money we've paid out. I do know that the government has almost no hope of tracing the use of the trillions it is spraying out, almost all of it to proven irresponsible politically-connected financial bigshots. And I do know enough to understand that far too many prominent economists are looking and acting bewildered. I also suspect that many Wall Street power brokers, the same ones that got us into this mess, are still in charge. I know enough to understand that many people who seem to be well-positioned to understand this mess are looking clueless. I hope I'm wrong in all my assumptions.