What kind of God?

People often argue about whether or not "God" exists, but what is the kind of "God" to which they are referring? A 2006 study at Baylor, based on responses provided by more than 1,700 people, suggested that Americans envision four basic types of "God." The results were summarized by the London Times:

[The study] found that Americans hold four different images of God — Authoritarian, Benevolent, Critical or Distant — and these views are far more powerful indicators about their political, social and moral attitudes than any of the traditional categories such as Protestant, Catholic or Evangelical.

It is startling to see that there is no majority view. Each of these types of "Gods" has His/Her/Its fans:
Nearly a third of Americans, 31.4 per cent, believe in an Authoritarian God, angry at earthly sin and willing to inflict divine retribution — including tsunamis and hurricanes. People who see God this way are religiously and politically the most conservative. They are more likely to be less educated and have lower incomes, come from the South and be white evangelicals or black Protestants. At the other end of the scale is the Distant God, seen by 24.4 per cent as a faceless, cosmic force that launched the world but leaves it alone. This is seen more by liberals, moral relativists and those who don’t attend church. This God has most believers on the West Coast. The Benevolent God, popular in America’s Midwest among mainstream Protestants, Catholics and Jews, is one that sets absolute standards for man, but is also forgiving — engaged but not so angry. Caring for the sick is high on the list of priorities for these 23 per cent of believers. The Critical God, at 16 per cent, is viewed as the classic bearded old man, judgmental but not going to intervene or punish, and is popular on the East Coast.
[caption id="attachment_14701" align="alignright" width="300" caption="God and Adam - Sistine Chapel "][/caption] Perhaps a follow-up survey could delve further into the many sub-types of "Gods" out there. Is "God" a He, a She or an It? Does God care about your favorite sports team winning? Does "God" really offer a chance to go to a heaven? Is there even a heaven at all? Did "God" really visit the earth in human form? Does "God" think it's OK to be gay? To have sex before marriage? To use birth control? Does "God" insist on good works? Does God prohibit the death penalty and wars? Does "God" prohibit eating any sorts of foods? What kinds of foods? Only shellfish, or meat on Fridays, or food that wasn't kosher? Just think of the huge number of permutations! Once we chart this out properly there will be billions of types of "Gods" out there in the minds of believers. These questions, and many others, would reveal that Americans believe in many millions of types of "God." Therefore, pollsters should do away with the question "Do you believe in God?" Any question that boils down one's characterization of "God" into the simplistic phrase "God" is hopelessly vague, and the resulting answers will inevitably suggest that there is no consensus as to who or what "God" is. If we took the time to parse our personal belief systems carefully, we would better see that the religious strife in this country involves millions of advocates for millions of idiosyncratic "Gods." Once we thoroughly sliced and diced our beliefs to this extent, we would hear people everywhere start uttering the word "projection." Maybe if we took the time to define "God" before advocating for His/Her/Its existence, we could all summon up more humility about the origins of the universe and the morality we attribute to our personalized "God." Maybe that extra humility would cut down on wars we are willing to start and our willingness to take sides in religious/cultural wars. Once we thoroughly break down the many types of belief systems out there, I believe that we will find out that "Gods" are like fingerprints--every person who believes in "God" has his or her own version of God. And this would mean that virtually every American is an atheist as to the "God" of virtually every other American. We are actually a land of hundreds of millions of religions of one member each, despite the fact that many of us physically gather together on holy days. Once we put our personalized "God" back on our mantle, instead of wearing Him/Her/It on our sleeve, then maybe we could better focus on the numerous pressing social problems that we face.

Continue ReadingWhat kind of God?

John Nichols of The Nation discusses the state of the media

Two nights ago, I attended a fund-raising event to support what is very much a grass roots organizing group, Grass Roots Organizing (GRO). John Nichols, Washington Correspondent for The Nation, was the keynote speaker. After the scheduled program (I'll be posting on that too), Nichols agreed to sit down with me in the empty ballroom to discuss the state of the media in the United States (see the video below). The bottom line is that these waters are fraught with danger, and media reform advocates too often find themselves playing defense, even with Democrat control of the Presidency and Congress. Nichols is in a good position to know about media issues, given that he co-founded Free Press with Robert McChesney. BTW, Free Press will be holding its 2011 National Conference for Media Reform in Boston from April 8-11. In a second video clip (see further below), Nichols discussed the travesty and the danger of the United States Supreme Court case of Citizens United v. SEC.

Continue ReadingJohn Nichols of The Nation discusses the state of the media

Quotes about banks

Prominent thinkers and politicians have often had harsh words about banks and bankers. Here is a sampling: -"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce." James A. Garfield -"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), Letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1802) -"Thus, our national circulating medium is now at the mercy of loan transactions of banks, which lend, not money, but promises to supply money they do not possess." Irving Fisher -"Where would we be if we had I.O.U.'s scrip and certificates floating all around the country?" Instead he decided to "issue currency against the sound assets of the banks. [As opposed to issuing currency against gold.] The Federal Reserve Act lets us print all we'll need. And it won't frighten the people. It won't look like stage money. It'll be money that looks like real money." [Emphasis added.] (Source: 'Closed for the Holiday: The Bank Holiday of 1933', p20 - Federal Reserve Bank of Boston) Treasury Secretary Woodin, 3/7/33 -"Banks have done more injury to the religion, morality, tranquility, prosperity, and even wealth of the nation than they can have done or ever will do good." John Adams -"When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain." Napoleon Bonaparte -“With the exception only of the period of the gold standard, practically all governments of history have used their exclusive power to issue money to defraud and plunder the people.” Friedrich A. Hayek (1899-1992) Austrian Economist, Author and 1974 Nobel Prize-Winner for Economics -"There can be no real individual freedom in the presence of economic insecurity." Chester Bowles (1901-1986) -“You are a den of Vipers! I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning.” Andrew Jackson -“The country is governed for the richest, for the corporations, the bankers, the land speculators, and for the exploiters of labor.” Helen Keller -“I hate banks. They do nothing positive for anybody except take care of themselves. They're first in with their fees and first out when there's trouble.” Earl Warren -“Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value ---- zero.” Voltaire (1694-1778) [More . . . ]

Continue ReadingQuotes about banks

Mind your expressions of dissent

Popular social news site Reddit provides a dramatic example of how innocent and ordinary conversations are enough to trigger terrorism investigations in our modern America. Reddit allows anyone with a free account to post items of interest, and the discussion generated by postings provides much of the site's appeal. About three months ago, a user named JayClay posted the following query in regards to the TSA's security screening procedures at airports:

"So if my deodorant could be a bomb, why are you just chucking it in the bin?
And if it's just harmless deodorant, why are you taking it from me?! But no. I did not say this aloud. Like everyone else, I didnt want to say or do anything that would jeopardize making my flight. So I just turned around and walked towards the room after security.
Where they just happened to sell deodorant.
The thread on Reddit has generated 1,563 comments as of now, mostly critical of the security theater that is the TSA. [More . . . ]

Continue ReadingMind your expressions of dissent

Project Noah

Check out Project Noah: According to Jill Priluck's article in Slate, it is "a database of spottings, a field guide, and a repository for ecology surveys." You could spend all day viewing the massive collections.

Project NOAH has found the sweet spot between professional scientists and casual naturalists. It began as an app for people to share their nature sightings but has evolved into a scientific and culturally relevant tool for both the masses and the experts. Project NOAH functions as a kind of Foursquare for flora and fauna, a way for amateur nature spotters to record the bugs, leaves, and birds they've found. Those data, in turn, have become a valuable tool for professional researchers.
The good news? "The platform is about to go global with a cross-media blitz, in hopes of turning wildlife spotting into a cultural sport."

Continue ReadingProject Noah