Comparing sizes of large objects and areas of land

Visualizing the size of large objects and areas of land has never been easier. Next time you're wondering how big something is, check out the BBC's website called Dimensions. I put the moon on top of Australia. Then I put the World Trade Center on top of my house. Then I superimposed the Mars rovers over my neighborhood. Then I placed the area affected by the 2010 Gulf Oil spill over New York City. For my finale, I compared the ancient walled city of Babylon with modern day Vatican City. This is a really nice use of Google Maps.

Continue ReadingComparing sizes of large objects and areas of land

Former Drug Czar of the UK: Legalize all drugs

Bob Ainsworth, who was once responsible for drug policy as drugs minister in the UK, has declared prohibition to be counterproductive.

We need to take effective measures to rob the dealers of their markets and the only way that we can do that is by supplying addicts through the medical profession, through prescription. We cannot afford to be shy about being prepared to do that. . . It is far better they are going to a doctor, or going to a chemist and are getting their script [prescription] than turning tricks as a prostitute or robbing their mates.

Continue ReadingFormer Drug Czar of the UK: Legalize all drugs

Top ten psychology studies of 2010

David DiSalvo sent me an email today to pitch his latest article at Psychology Today: "Ten Psychological Studies from 2010 Worth Knowing About." Cool. Take a look at what's included in the list: - Daniel Gilbert determined that we daydream 46.9% of our waking hours. Gad, do tell employers, or else they will cut everybody's pay in half. - Embodied cognition studies demonstrate that our physical environments are tied metaphorically to our social environments. "For example, the study shows that when you're negotiating a deal, it's better to sit in a hard, sturdy chair--doing so may lead you to negotiate harder than you otherwise would. And when you go for a job interview, be sure to carry your resume in a weighty, well constructed padfolio." - Sweat carries messages. "Gamblers sniffing the high-ropers' sweat . . . took significantly larger gambling risks compared to the bike-sweat-sniffing gamblers." - We're happier when we keep busy. - Rich people see other people. "People from lower socioeconomic backgrounds from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are significantly better at accurately reading emotion--a key component of expressing empathy." All this and much more at David DiSalvo's blog at Psychology Today.

Continue ReadingTop ten psychology studies of 2010

Rock and Roll Hall of Fame – Fair and Balanced?

Scanning the headlines today, I saw in my peripheral vision one announcing the latest list of inductees into the Rock and Rock Hall of Fame. I've heard stories about the selection process, but haven't paid much attention because I guess it's most like the Wallaces' (and Wallechinsky's) Book(s) of Lists - based on opinion, not quantifiable metrics. Just who is Darlene Love anyway? No matter. I don't really care, but on a whim,I checked to see if my favorite group Rush is in. Nope. Conspicuous in their absence were also Kiss (I'd heard about that before). I consider Rush to be the most talented trio in the history of rock music. Rumor has it that Jann Wenner doesn't. Still, as opinionated and usually hermitlike as I am on music, I know I am not alone in my assessment (of Rush), plus I have multiple musicians in the family that agree with me. I'm not a fan of Kiss, but how are they any less influential than some of the others? Ah...Jann Wenner. True or not, both their absences make the Hall a joke because look at the list of past inductees. In: Steely Dan ????? (Oh, the words I could not use in public to describe what I think of that!); David Bowie?; James Taylor? Come on! Not in: Boston(??!); Yes (???!!); B-52's - Hello? Not Boston? Not Yes? In: John Paul and George (no Ringo) are in it as individuals and as the Beatles; Metallica; Aerosmith; AC/DC - all no brainers Not in: Kansas; Journey; Styx; Emerson, Lake and Palmer In: Stevie Wonder - are you serious?; John Mellencamp ??; Buffalo Springfield ?; ABBA ???; Paul Simon and Simon & Garfunkel; The director of the Rush documentary "Rush: Beyond the Lighted Stage" commented to Entertainment Weekly

“It’s unfortunate,” says Scot McFadyen, ...“We were hoping a lot more people in the [nominating] room had seen our documentary, and maybe that would have given them a different perspective on the band. But there are just some people that are holding out.” As disappointing as Rush’s latest snub was, McFadyen wasn’t necessarily surprised. “They’ve never been a critics’ band. The industry people that are involved with the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, Rush has never been cool enough for them.”
I think Wenner and the Hall should adopt the slogan of another media entity that also isn't: "Fair and balanced" Last year, one list of snubs included Alice Cooper, who made the cut this time around. So who is missing in the Hall from your list?

Continue ReadingRock and Roll Hall of Fame – Fair and Balanced?

Chris Hedges is not bullish on America

I’m finished watching the first thirty minutes of this talk by Chris Hedges, and much of it is resonating with me. Here are a few of the early points made by Hedges: Those who have been hurt the most by corporate profiteering have been rendered invisible by the corporate media. The corporate media has imposed “a bland uniformity of opinion” upon us. Those who are the most powerful are not those who hold formal titles; It’s our job to make the powerful frightened of us. The question isn’t how to get “good people” into power. It’s how we can limit the damage done to us by people in power. Liberals have lost all credibility. We now have a bankrupt liberal class – one that is nihilist. They “refuse to confront the permanent war economy.” The up and coming fascist movements in America have tapped into the rage of ordinary American because liberals failed to seize the opportunity. We will now increasingly have to deal with politicians whose aim is totalitarianism. They will find scapegoats to blame for America’s woes, and they will not serve as legitimate rulers. Rather, they will, as George Orwell predicted, “cling to power by force and fraud.” We now have “inverted totalitarianism.” It has not been built around a demagogue; rather, it is "expressed in the anonymity of the corporate state." Citizens are utterly impotent within the current system.

Continue ReadingChris Hedges is not bullish on America