Peter McCullough: The Current Corruption and Dysfunction of the “House of Medicine.”

Dr. Peter McCullough's summary of the current corruption and dysfunction of the "House of Medicine." Shocking and horrifying account of what really ails us.

In the first half of this talk, McCullough tells the sordid tale of power and corruption. How we got into this mess. Then he addresses some of the damage:

The vaccines didn't work. They didn't stop anybody from getting COVID. They didn't stop transmission. Our CDC director came out and said that early. And they didn't reduce the severity of disease. They're not going to prevent a recurrence right now. There's a fear media campaign right now saying everyone should take more shots because more COVID is coming.

They failed on all four counts. They failed on all four counts and I think America would have accepted an apology. America would have been very forgiving. The world would have been okay with that if they were safe, but it turns out the vaccines, as many of you know, aren't safe.

As we sit here today, we have 3,400 peer-reviewed papers describing fatal and non-fatal vaccine injury symptoms in the National Library of Medicine. It is not controversial It's not a theory. It is real. These vaccines cause very real side effects and they're in four major categories. One is cardiovascular and cardio--heart inflammation myocarditis, cardiac arrest. Number two is neurologic, all forms of stroke, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, neuropathy. Number three: blood clotting like we've never seen in medicine before. Blood clots that don't respond to typical blood thinners that are just a disaster. And number four: immune system abnormalities.

In the final segment, McCullough discusses the link between excess vaccinations (he has had 67 over his life), autism and transgender ideology.

Continue ReadingPeter McCullough: The Current Corruption and Dysfunction of the “House of Medicine.”

“Gender” Ideology as a Cult

I've often commented at length on "gender ideology" at this website. Despite my deep concerns about the damage that it is doing to children and teenagers, it is my opinion that every adult has the right to do whatever they want to their own body. Surgeries, hormones, whatever. Further, it is a good thing that adults who transition do not relinquish any legal right as a result of presenting as the opposite sex.  We should not discriminate against those who transition.

That said, it is also my position that we need to protect children and teenagers from making decisions that that will turn them into life-long medical patients reliant on experimental drugs and surgeries that will render them sterile. Medical authorities in an increasing number of European countries agree. That is why the British Authorities are completely shutting down Tavistock, the largest gender clinic in the world.

I am not at all convinced by the seductive rhetoric of "gender" ideology (In my opinion the word "gender" is meaningless). I am convinced that most of these children and teenagers are suffering from mental health issues not related to "gender" dysphoria, yet well-meaning adults and peers advocate for these ghoulish procedures as a one-size-fits-all magical cure for complex issues not related to sex roles. Based on my readings, it is a extraordinarily rare child or tweenager who is a candidate for transition. Almost no one is born in the wrong body. I agree with Chris Elston ("Billboard Chris"): "There are two sexes, zero genders and countless personalities." I also largely agree with the Tweets of Matt Walsh and Chris Elston (below) that "gender" ideology operates as a cult and that it is permanently hurting thousands of children. I highly recommend Elston's interview in the comment to Walsh's tweet below.

Continue Reading“Gender” Ideology as a Cult

“What is Your Gender Identity?”

"What is Your Gender Identity?"

How would you respond to this question if you were put on the spot? Here's one approach . . .

If I were asked today, I would say something like this: "Unlike sex, "gender identity" is an incoherent and thus meaningless term."

Why do I think "gender identity" is an incoherent term? Here is one reason:

In other words, gender ideologists claim that one's genitals are both A) completely irrelevant to one's gender and B) highly relevant to one's gender. To make both of these claims is incoherent. Here's another thing I might add:

Another idea . . .

Perhaps you could point out that "gender ideology" embraces the regressive sex stereotypes most of us (not only feminists) have been trying to downplay for decades:

A comment to the above tweet:

It really sucks to know that we worked so hard to erase gender stereotypes. Let girls and boys dress how they want, play with whatever toys they wanted, play whatever sports, have whatever interests...boys can dance, girls can be mechanics. We fought so hard. Then this crap.

Or you could invite them to listen to this podcast where Bari Weiss interviews Andrew Sullivan, a pioneer in gay rights.  Sullivan doesn't support gender ideology because it is functionally homophobic. Most children claiming to be confused about their sex will, if left alone (not surgically butchered and rendered sterile by cross-sex hormones) grow up to accept their bodies, the great majority of them growing up to be gay (and see here).  For this reason, Sullivan characterizes gender ideology to be homophobic.

If things heat up too much, you might want to inject some humor:

Continue Reading“What is Your Gender Identity?”

The Mischaracterization of LGB Alliance as a Supposed Hate Group

Mia Ashton describes how it happened that lesbians are being attacked and disparaged. Here is an excerpt of her article at Public:

"[F]rom its conception, LGB Alliance was under attack. While Harris describes that first meeting as “joyous,” during which those who had been silenced and called bigots, transphobes, and neo-Nazis basked in the joy of meeting like-minded individuals, the announcement of their group’s formation just days later “unleashed the most extraordinary storm.”

“From that moment onwards, there was an absolute onslaught against us to try and squash us before we started,” recalls Harris. The reason for this was that, at that point, LGB Alliance was the only organization in the world that said it was okay to be gay or lesbian and not believe in gender identity.

In the deluge of abuse that followed, LGB Alliance was repeatedly called a hate group. Harris thinks it was LGB in the name that really made trans activists angry. “That implied that we hated the T. Well, we don’t agree. We think you can have a dogs’ charity who don’t hate cats.”

But according to Harris and Jackson, redefining homosexuality from same-sex attraction to same-gender attraction and insisting that heterosexual men can be lesbians is not the only harmful effect of trans activism on the LGB community.

Because another curious development was that Stonewall, and self-proclaimed LGBTQ+ activists, also started to advocate for the medicalization of adolescents who identify as transgender, many of whom are gay or lesbian. “This is what is happening in schools at the moment,” Jackson explained, “lesbian has become a dirty word. There was a time when being gay or lesbian was becoming more accepted, even among teenagers, but now it is not.” Now lesbians come out first as lesbians, then they call themselves non-binary, and then, “six months later, they’re trying to find testosterone, and they’re trying to have their breasts cut off.”

Continue ReadingThe Mischaracterization of LGB Alliance as a Supposed Hate Group