Anthony Fauci Tries to Forget
We must never allow Anthony Fauci and the Corporate News to rewrite history. They advocated for closing down the economy, which was a needless disaster.
About the Newest “Safe and Effective” COVID Vaccine
Dr. Vinay Prasad concludes "The FDA, CDC, Pfizer and the Biden administration are practicing reckless medicine," Here is his advice:
The Biden Administration is not science based. They are as ignorant as the anti-science fringe they decry. I would watch for conflicts of interest as Califf, Jha, Murthy and others move into private sector.
I will never get another COVID19 shot until someone shows it lowers the risk of severe disease for someone of (a) my age and (b) who already had 3 doses (2 against my will) and (c) COVID. Practically, given the anti-science admin, this will be never.
I would not advise anyone healthy <65 to get the vaccine.
I would not advise anyone healthy who had COVID already to get the vaccine.
For those >65 with medical problems, and no prior covid, there are no data. I suspect nearly none of these people will want the booster, and I won’t push back. I have no data to fight with.
I would discourage all COVID19 vaccination of anyone healthy <30 (this is most insane); Especially <18. At this point, all have had covid and no data show further doses help them.
Colleges & hospitals should NEVER mandate this booster.
I will continue to oppose the universal booster program without data, and this anti-science administration.
Peter McCullough: The Current Corruption and Dysfunction of the “House of Medicine.”
Dr. Peter McCullough's summary of the current corruption and dysfunction of the "House of Medicine." Shocking and horrifying account of what really ails us.
In the first half of this talk, McCullough tells the sordid tale of power and corruption. How we got into this mess. Then he addresses some of the damage:
The vaccines didn't work. They didn't stop anybody from getting COVID. They didn't stop transmission. Our CDC director came out and said that early. And they didn't reduce the severity of disease. They're not going to prevent a recurrence right now. There's a fear media campaign right now saying everyone should take more shots because more COVID is coming.
They failed on all four counts. They failed on all four counts and I think America would have accepted an apology. America would have been very forgiving. The world would have been okay with that if they were safe, but it turns out the vaccines, as many of you know, aren't safe.
As we sit here today, we have 3,400 peer-reviewed papers describing fatal and non-fatal vaccine injury symptoms in the National Library of Medicine. It is not controversial It's not a theory. It is real. These vaccines cause very real side effects and they're in four major categories. One is cardiovascular and cardio--heart inflammation myocarditis, cardiac arrest. Number two is neurologic, all forms of stroke, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, neuropathy. Number three: blood clotting like we've never seen in medicine before. Blood clots that don't respond to typical blood thinners that are just a disaster. And number four: immune system abnormalities.
In the final segment, McCullough discusses the link between excess vaccinations (he has had 67 over his life), autism and transgender ideology.
Medical Gold Standard Becomes Controversial During COVID
Somehow this formula did become controversial for many people.
The consequences?
Pfizer Execs doing what they do . . .
Jimmy Dore and Bret Weinstein give these two lying Pfizer executives what they deserve for these big lies. Then, when you think it's winding down, Bret brings up Nuremberg Code See below).
One can make an extremely strong argument that American's didn't have informed consent when they were coerced to line up for the COVID vaccination. How important is informed consent? Here's what the Nuremberg Code specifies about informed consent in medical settings:
"The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential."
What does this mean? Here's the explanation offered by Evelyne Shutter in her article at the New England Journal of Medicine: "Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code."
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.