The Statin Scam

Here's something Pharma won't emphasize to you or your doctor:

"[S]tatins have a very high rate of injury. For example, the existing studies find between a 5-30% rate of injuries,19 and Dr. Malhotra, having gone through all the existing evidence estimates that 20% of statin users are injured by them.

Likewise, statins are well known for having a high percentage of patients discontinue the drugs due to their side effects (e.g., one large study found 44.7% of older adults discontinue the drugs within a year of starting them, while another large study of adults of all ages found 47% discontinued within a year)."

What follows is an excerpt from an article by "A Midwestern Doctor," a Substack I follow closely:

Despite decades of statin use costing approximately $25 billion annually in America alone, heart disease remains the leading cause of death, suggesting the cholesterol hypothesis that drives statin prescriptions is fundamentally flawed

Studies show that lowering cholesterol with statins does not reduce heart disease, and yet these findings are ignored while statin guidelines are created by experts paid by pharmaceutical manufacturers

Malcolm Kendrick’s clotting model provides a superior explanation for heart disease: atherosclerotic plaques result from repeated damage to blood vessel linings which the body repairs with layers of clots.

The medical establishment dismisses widespread reports of statin injuries as “nocebo effects,” paralleling how COVID-19 vaccine injuries were dismissed as “anxiety,” despite extensive evidence corroborating the injuries.

The actual causes of heart disease—fine particulate matter from pollution and cigarettes, lead exposure, chronic stress, and endothelial damage—receive minimal research funding because effective interventions cannot be patented and sold as expensive pharmaceuticals like statins.

Read the article for numerous links on this issue.

Continue ReadingThe Statin Scam

Bill Gates, COVID, Epstein, Greed, Lying, Etc

No need for a lie detector on Bill  Gates.

"Abject Lie" is written on his forehead. Just dinner. "That's all." You might think my venom is due to his attempt to surreptitiously slip antibiotics to his wife after surreptitiously exposing her to venereal disease caused by his adventures with Jeffrey Epstein. No, that's merely the tip of the iceberg.

Sayer Ji lays it out. Go to Sayer Ji's article, "BREAKING: The Epstein Files Illuminate a 20-Year Architecture Behind Pandemics as a Business Model—With Bill Gates at the Center of the Network: Inside the JPMorgan–Gates–Epstein Pipeline: Donor-Advised Funds, Vaccine Finance, and the Architecture of Pre-Positioned Profit."

Also visit Ji's recent posts on X. Start here:

Dig into this post and the posts that follow for images of documents and links to many other documents that substantiate all of this).

We thought we have been electing the people who govern us, but George Carlin was so very correct when he said: "They own you," and he was speaking of the "Big Club," people like Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, people we did NOT elect and whom we would never have elected. Yet this is just one example (out of millions) of what corrupt people can do to mold a 'democracy" in their own image and likeness.  Eric Weinstein reacts:

Weinstein continues in the comments to his own post:

I have the same question as Weinstein. In his comment to his own post, Weinstein continues:

[More . . . ]

Continue ReadingBill Gates, COVID, Epstein, Greed, Lying, Etc

Vaccines Arrived Only After the Massive Drop in Many Diseases

This chart should be mandatory viewing for anyone wanting to debate whether any vaccines should be mandatory.

Roman Bystrianyk, Coauthor of Dissolving Illusions alongside Suzanne Humphries, MD:

The common belief that the decline in infectious disease deaths is due to modern medicine, like antibiotics and vaccines, is incorrect. The vast majority of the decline, particularly in the early 19th and 20th centuries, preceded these medical ideas.

Three key developments drove the earlier progress:

1. The rise of robust public health infrastructure, including engineered sanitation and sewer systems, protected municipal water supplies with filtration and chlorination, systematic garbage collection, early measures to control water and industrial air pollution, food safety regulations (e.g., meat inspection), and vector control (e.g., mosquito reduction).

2. Profound improvements in personal and socioeconomic well-being, such as vastly improved nutrition and increased dietary diversity, rising wages, less crowded housing with better ventilation (which increased exposure to sunlight and thus vitamin D production), the enactment of protective child and adult labor laws, public education, and greater public personal hygiene.

3. The abandonment of harmful medical practices, including treatments with mercury, arsenic, and strychnine, bloodletting and purging, and the “hot regimen,” cleared the way for more supportive care. Data strongly support the pivotal role of public health infrastructure. Research indicates that nearly 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality among American children occurred between 1900 and 1940, a period before the widespread availability of antibiotics and most vaccines. A parallel, even steeper decline—over 98%—was observed in England and Wales, underscoring that this was a widespread phenomenon driven by societal factors rather than specific medical interventions (and in fact far fewer medical interventions).

...nearly 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality among US children occurred [from 1900] before 1940, when few antibiotics or vaccines were available.

[“Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: Trends in the Health of Americans During the 20th Century,” Pediatrics, December 2000, pp. 1307-1317.]

Continue ReadingVaccines Arrived Only After the Massive Drop in Many Diseases

How Does Pharma Test the Vaccines on the Childhood Schedule?

Eric Berg, MD explains how Pharma "tests" the vaccines on the childhood schedule. His explanation substantially overlaps that of Aaron Siri  (and see here and here). Here's how it was summed up on X by Valerie Anne Smith:

"When You Test A Drug, It's Against A Placebo."

"Vaccines Are Not Tested Against Placebos...They Are Tested Against Another Active Vaccine."

"That's Like Testing Whiskey Against Bourbon."

'Placebos' Used In Vaccine Clinical Trials As Listed From The Package Inserts For Common Vaccines:

Hepatitis B Clinical Trial...Placebo used was Aluminum Adjuvant & only safety tested for 5 days.

Vaxelis 6 in 1 Vaccine Trial...Placebo Was DTaP, Polio, HIB & Hep-B Vaccines.

HPV Gardasil Clinical Trial...Placebo used was Aluminum Adjuvant & Hep-A Vaccine. Only safety tested for 14 days.

Hepatitis A Clinical Trial...Placebo used was Hepatitis-B Vaccine & participants were monitored for 14 days.

Influenza A Clinical Trial...Placebo used was Influenza B Vaccine & clinical trial volunteers were followed for 28 days.

Meningitis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was the DTaP Vaccine & adverse reactions were monitored for 7 days.

Pertussis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was the Diphtheria & Tetanus Vaccine. Participants were followed for 14 days.

Prevnar-13 Pneumonia Clinical Trial...Placebo used was the Prevnar-7 Vaccine & volunteers were monitored for 7 days.

Polio Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Polio Vaccine & patients were monitored for 2 days.

Chicken Pox Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was diluted Chicken Pox Vaccine & trial volunteers were monitored for 42 days.

Shingles Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was diluted Shingles Vaccine & participants were followed for 7 days.

mNEXSPIKE Covid Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was SPIKEVAX Covid Vaccine & only safety tested 7 days.

Without informed consent & without the use of a saline placebo skews all results & makes all vaccines appear "safe & effective" because the adverse events & side effects in both groups are the same.

The US CDC Government's belief on placebos as stated on the CDC website...

"Testing a new vaccine against a saline injection is considered unethical."

"Depriving half of the trial participants of an older vaccine(which is approved to use as placebo) & giving them a true saline placebo instead would not be fair: it would actually be unethical."

"Saline injections don’t cause a sore arm, which might unwittingly reveal to the 'double blind volunteers' that they are in the placebo group. Those who get the experimental vaccine & those who get placebo must be kept secret."

Who is Dr. Eric Berg. Per Grok:

Dr. Eric Berg, DC (Doctor of Chiropractic), is a health educator, best-selling author, and chiropractor specializing in nutrition, Healthy Keto diets, and intermittent fasting. Born around 1965, he faced personal health challenges that inspired his career shift toward natural health solutions.

Continue ReadingHow Does Pharma Test the Vaccines on the Childhood Schedule?

Three Types of Vaccines, Each with Their Risks

Bret Weinstein explains that there are three types of vaccines and none of them are completely safe.

Camus summarizes Weinstein's short presentation:

1. Live Attenuated Vaccines: The risk here is unpredictability and evolution. A virus weakened for one person may cause a serious infection in another. Crucially, it can revert to a pathogenic, transmissible form—a "contagious vaccine." The historical case of the oral polio vaccine causing numerous polio cases stands as a stark warning.

2. Inactivated Virus/Fragments (with Adjuvant): The problem is immune misdirection. A dead virus alone is unconvincing, requiring an "adjuvant"—a chemical alarm bell. This non-specific signal causes the immune system to "freak out," not just at the target antigen but at anything present, like pollen or gut bacteria. Indiscriminately triggering a systemic immune response is a dangerous gamble.

3. mRNA Technology: The danger is haphazard biodistribution. The mRNA instructions travel unpredictably, instructing cells anywhere in the body to produce the foreign antigen. The immune system then rightly identifies these cells as infected and attacks them. This random destruction of healthy tissue—for instance, in the heart—is an unacceptable and fundamentally unsafe mechanism.

Continue ReadingThree Types of Vaccines, Each with Their Risks