New Attempt to Prop Up the Corrupt Corporate News Media

Government funding is being proposed for corporate media. This will work in tandem with government censorship to muzzle everyone else (as the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals made clear in the case of Missouri v Biden, about to be argued at the U.S. Supreme Court). This dramatic and deplorable proposal is necessary because, as anyone who is paying attention knows, corporate media is a source of non-stop lies on virtually any issue of national importance.

Take-aways from this article:

Establishment media companies are facing a decline in their dominance due to competition from decentralized media.

Some media figures have used recent layoffs at news companies to claim the industry is facing a crisis.

In the U.S., these efforts have coalesced around the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act (JCPA), which would funnel money from Big Tech to the media industry, while excluding independent competitors.

Establishment media companies already receive billions of dollars in subsidies from tech companies and governments around the world, but industry lobbyists still claim the bill is needed to save the industry.

The bill has attracted the support of the censorship industry, which presents the establishment media as a bulwark against alleged mis- and dis-information.

Continue ReadingNew Attempt to Prop Up the Corrupt Corporate News Media

The Inconvenient Recent COVID Data of the VAERS System

Now that signals are pouring in on the VAERS system (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) that the COVID vaccinations are temporally associated with deaths and injuries, the Gates Foundation shows up right on schedule to attack the integrity of VAERS, warning of "Misinformation and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System."

Dr. Peter McCullough explains his concerns:

Every week in clinic I make entries into the US CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) as I catch up on years of injuries, disabilities, and deaths that have occurred after vaccination. Because federal fines and penalties are severe for false reporting, I only enter cases in which I have the vaccine card, the full clinical vignette, and my clinical impression that the vaccine either directly caused the problem or significantly contributed in the causal pathway to the new disease or injury suffered by the patient. I did a PUBMED search today and there are > 500 papers that have relied on VAERS for epidemiologic studies of vaccine side effects including death in 126 manuscripts.

As the data mount, it should come at no surprise that the Gates Foundation, a major player in the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex has come out with an attack on the integrity of VAERS. It came through a JAMA editorial from Kathleen Hall Jamieson, PhD, that implied VAERS is “misinformation” in the title uses the adjective “unverified.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Jamieson, whose Annenberg Center is funded in part by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, goes on to propose a name change to VAERS to further diminish its importance. . . I expect at some moment, the data on vaccine safety will be so overwhelming in VAERS that the CDC will simply shut down access the system for queries and research. As sponsors of the program, the agency will refuse to tell America or the world anything on the safety of the novel, genetic biological products.

For the record, U.S. public health officials have used and trusted the VAERS system for decades. From the current VAERS About Page:

About VAERS

Background and Public Health Importance

Medical professionals working with vaccines Established in 1990, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a national early warning system to detect possible safety problems in U.S.-licensed vaccines. VAERS is co-managed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). VAERS accepts and analyzes reports of adverse events (possible side effects) after a person has received a vaccination. Anyone can report an adverse event to VAERS. Healthcare professionals are required to report certain adverse events and vaccine manufacturers are required to report all adverse events that come to their attention.

VAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on individuals to send in reports of their experiences to CDC and FDA. VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused a health problem, but is especially useful for detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse event reporting that might indicate a possible safety problem with a vaccine. This way, VAERS can provide CDC and FDA with valuable information that additional work and evaluation is necessary to further assess a possible safety concern.

Let's see whether this self-description of VAERS, or even fundamental aspects of the VAERS system, changes in response to new suspicious pressures . . .

Continue ReadingThe Inconvenient Recent COVID Data of the VAERS System

Concerns About the Risks Associated with the COVID Vax Continue to be Censored

Meaningful conversations regarding potential dangers of the COVID "vaccination" continue to be censored.

The journal Cureus on Monday retracted the first peer-reviewed paper to provide an extensive analysis of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine trial data and post-injection injuries. The authors of the paper also called for a global moratorium on the vaccines.

Continue ReadingConcerns About the Risks Associated with the COVID Vax Continue to be Censored

COVID Disinformation, Lies and Censorship Explored in Congressional Hearing

Here are at least a dozen major issues relating to COVID that corporate media outlets are actively refusing to discuss. The US govt has actively worked to keep you from discussing these issues on social media. I don't claim to know the answers, but I desperately want to hear these topics vigorously discussed.

Continue ReadingCOVID Disinformation, Lies and Censorship Explored in Congressional Hearing

Insulting Paper Declares that U.S. College Students are of Average Intelligence

From today's TGIF by Nellie Bowles:

We never meant to imply college kids weren’t brilliant: A study out of Mount Royal University in Canada has found college kids aren’t smarter than the average person of their age anymore. Paper title: “Meta-analysis: On average, undergraduate students’ intelligence is merely average.” See, college kids used to be smarter than the general population, when going into higher education was more of a selective thing. But now that so many people go to college, they’re all just intellectually normal. Which you could easily argue is great: More college for more kids! The paper was accepted for publication in Frontiers in Psychology Cognitive Science. But then the commentary class heard about it, and they did not like this one bit. There was outrage! Are you calling us. . . average? The commentary class may be for equity in theory but in practice they need to be told early and often that they are superior. Not average, which is violence, technically. And so the paper was pulled. I’m completely serious that the reason is: Reviewers felt that saying college kids now are “merely” average is “demeaning.” Everyone gets a trophy. And everyone is above average.

Continue ReadingInsulting Paper Declares that U.S. College Students are of Average Intelligence