Barack Obama Selectively Grapples with Authoritarianism

I voted for Obama twice. I knew he wasn't perfect when I voted, but now his gloss has almost completely dulled for me. Why? Yes, for the reasons mentioned by Jimmy Dore. But especially because Obama has now been exposed as one of the main architects of Russiagate. And not in an incidental way. Obama's involvement with that vast conspiracy and the years' long coverup was intentional and premeditated (see here and here and here). And worst of all, Obama's ruse disenfranchised half of U.S. voters.

Jimmy Dore:

Obama prosecuted more journalists using the Espionage Act than all presidents before him combined.

He arrested, jailed & tortured Chelsea Manning for revealing war crimes committed in our name.

He repealed the Smith-Mundt act which now allows the CIA/FBI to directly propagandize American citizens & infiltrate unions/ NGO’s/school boards/ & organizations of all kinds.

He deported 3 million Hispanics & built the cages Democrats protested against under Trump.

Obama took us from 2 wars to 7 wars while ramping up the drone bombings killing innocent people left & right.

He effectively repealed Habeas Corpus & gave the government the authority to jail people indefinitely without a trial.

Obama is a Myth pushed by the establishment & their bought media to make you think there was someone fighting for you while he was serving Banks, Big Pharma, the MIC & his corporate masters.

Continue ReadingBarack Obama Selectively Grapples with Authoritarianism

How Does Pharma Test the Vaccines on the Childhood Schedule?

Eric Berg, MD explains how Pharma "tests" the vaccines on the childhood schedule. His explanation substantially overlaps that of Aaron Siri  (and see here and here). Here's how it was summed up on X by Valerie Anne Smith:

"When You Test A Drug, It's Against A Placebo."

"Vaccines Are Not Tested Against Placebos...They Are Tested Against Another Active Vaccine."

"That's Like Testing Whiskey Against Bourbon."

'Placebos' Used In Vaccine Clinical Trials As Listed From The Package Inserts For Common Vaccines:

Hepatitis B Clinical Trial...Placebo used was Aluminum Adjuvant & only safety tested for 5 days.

Vaxelis 6 in 1 Vaccine Trial...Placebo Was DTaP, Polio, HIB & Hep-B Vaccines.

HPV Gardasil Clinical Trial...Placebo used was Aluminum Adjuvant & Hep-A Vaccine. Only safety tested for 14 days.

Hepatitis A Clinical Trial...Placebo used was Hepatitis-B Vaccine & participants were monitored for 14 days.

Influenza A Clinical Trial...Placebo used was Influenza B Vaccine & clinical trial volunteers were followed for 28 days.

Meningitis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was the DTaP Vaccine & adverse reactions were monitored for 7 days.

Pertussis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was the Diphtheria & Tetanus Vaccine. Participants were followed for 14 days.

Prevnar-13 Pneumonia Clinical Trial...Placebo used was the Prevnar-7 Vaccine & volunteers were monitored for 7 days.

Polio Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Polio Vaccine & patients were monitored for 2 days.

Chicken Pox Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was diluted Chicken Pox Vaccine & trial volunteers were monitored for 42 days.

Shingles Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was diluted Shingles Vaccine & participants were followed for 7 days.

mNEXSPIKE Covid Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo used was SPIKEVAX Covid Vaccine & only safety tested 7 days.

Without informed consent & without the use of a saline placebo skews all results & makes all vaccines appear "safe & effective" because the adverse events & side effects in both groups are the same.

The US CDC Government's belief on placebos as stated on the CDC website...

"Testing a new vaccine against a saline injection is considered unethical."

"Depriving half of the trial participants of an older vaccine(which is approved to use as placebo) & giving them a true saline placebo instead would not be fair: it would actually be unethical."

"Saline injections don’t cause a sore arm, which might unwittingly reveal to the 'double blind volunteers' that they are in the placebo group. Those who get the experimental vaccine & those who get placebo must be kept secret."

Who is Dr. Eric Berg. Per Grok:

Dr. Eric Berg, DC (Doctor of Chiropractic), is a health educator, best-selling author, and chiropractor specializing in nutrition, Healthy Keto diets, and intermittent fasting. Born around 1965, he faced personal health challenges that inspired his career shift toward natural health solutions.

Continue ReadingHow Does Pharma Test the Vaccines on the Childhood Schedule?

The Underlying Cause of the Immigrant Crisis: Attempted Election Rigging

What are we to do with the many millions of people who poured over the border during the Biden Administration, while the Biden Administration denied that it was happening and then denied that it could do anything to stop the flow of unvetted people over American borders?

I know this is a complex issue at this point, but it has been more and more clear to me that this movement of migrants across our borders was orchestrated by the Biden Administration for the purpose of electing Democrats in swing states. What to do with millions of people who are illegally here now? Especially given the negative impact mass unvetted immigration has had on many parts of the US, including increased crime. It's a big mess, but it's important to understand what happened and why. Joe Rogan sums it up well when discussing the possibility that Kamala Harris might run for president in 2028:

I'll ask [Harris] controversial things, man. It's all I have to do is ask you, Why [was] the border open?" We can talk about that for three hours. Oh my gosh. What are you trying to do? Right? You could close that border. Trump closed that border in a day. Amazing. In a day. You could say I hate what's going on with ice, and I don't like it either. I don't like this thing of like taking people.

And here's the thing, well, they should have done it the right way. But if you're poor and you live in a third world country, that's not an available option. Okay? What is an available option is this one administration over four years was encouraging people to go through, not only encouraging you to go through. There's Red Cross stops along the way. They give you maps. They tell you how to do it. People are being, they're funding people getting in. They're paying for air flights. They're flying people in. They're moving people into swing states. They're getting them on Medicare. They're getting them on Social Security.

We talked about this one lady who did an interview. She was being told to try to get people on permanent disability. So she was told to ask them, "Do you have back problems?" They're like, yes, okay, great, personal disability. Now that she she said I was told to view them as a client now, And so you're trying, essentially to bribe people to Now, once you get them in to move to swing state. Then they count on the census. Once they count on the census, it adds congressional seats. So it's like you're rigging elections by bringing in immigrants, and then you're giving them money.

And all these people that live in these poor communities, they're like, "Hey, where was all this money for us? Where was all this money for the people in Chicago? In Chicago? Where was all this money the people in Baltimore?" No, no, they're doing it because they're trying to manipulate the election. It didn't work. You know, it didn't work. Like, I got into an argument someone about it. But, yeah, it didn't work, though. I go, Yeah, but they tried to do it. It didn't work.

But they did move people to swing states. They did leave the border open for four years. They did let in millions of people. They don't even know how many. They don't know how many people got through. That's crazy. Once they got them here, they did give them EBT cards. They did give them cell phones. They did. They moved them into the fucking hotel, that Roosevelt Hotel in New York City, this luxury hotel filled with migrants. They paid for their food. They did do this. They encouraged people. They did have sanctuary cities where they weren't going to arrest them. They let them come in.

Every bit of the above is easily substantiated by searching first hand accounts on X. Almost none of it can be found in corporate media outlets. Therefore, there's no way to discuss it civilly with people "across the aisle" since, factually speaking, we come from two almost non-overlapping informational ecosystems.

Continue ReadingThe Underlying Cause of the Immigrant Crisis: Attempted Election Rigging

Julian Assange Discusses Trump and Russia; Hillary Clinton and Russia

Julian Assange has proven himself highly principled and courageous. He has broken more meaningful stories in the past 20 years than all corporate media combined. in this video he discusses his findings regarding Donald Trump and Russia, as well as Hillary Clinton and Russia.

As summarized by RealRobert:

As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton accepted a $3 million bribe from the Kremlin. Simultaneously, her top advisor and campaign chairman, Pizzaman John Podesta, received a $35 million bribe through Rusnano—a company widely known as “Putin’s Child.”

The price? Control over twenty percent of the United States’ uranium supply, surrendered to foreign interests.

Uranium—the critical element for nuclear weapons.

The cost? Treason at the highest level.

Continue ReadingJulian Assange Discusses Trump and Russia; Hillary Clinton and Russia

The Sorry State of Scientific Literature

It is surreal to read these quotes about the unreliability of science publications by people in a good position to evaluate this dysfunction.

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Science has taken a turn toward darkness.”

-Richard Horton, former Editor-in-Chief of The Lancet (the world’s premier medical journal) [

Richard Horton, the editor-in-chief of The Lancet, wrote this statement in a comment titled "Offline: What is medicine's 5 sigma?" published in the journal on April 11, 2015.]

--

"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" (2006)

John P. A. Ioannidis

There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false. The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientific field. In this framework, a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller; when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance. Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias. In this essay, I discuss the implications of these problems for the conduct and interpretation of research.

--

Karl Kanthak posts this:

“Health research is based on trust. Health professionals and journal editors reading the results of a clinical trial assume that the trial happened and that the results were honestly reported. But about 20% of the time, said Ben Mol, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at Monash Health, they would be wrong.”

--

Post by InsiderHCW:

It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion.
- Marcia Angell, Editor, New England Journal of Medicine. [Marcia Angell wrote this statement in her article "Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption," published in The New York Review of Books on January 15, 2009].

--

So how do we know who to trust, in science, media, politics, or anywhere else that people claim that they are experts and that we need to trust them? It makes one almost this cynical . . .

Continue ReadingThe Sorry State of Scientific Literature