The Washington Post reported a story today without mentioning that until today, the paper has been engaging in reckless journalism for many months prior. Here’s today’s headline:

“‘Havana syndrome’ not caused by energy weapon or foreign adversary, intelligence review finds: After a years-long assessment, five U.S. intelligence agencies conclude it is ‘very unlikely’ an enemy wielding a secret weapon was behind the mysterious ailment.

To be a modern corporate journalist, you don’t need any evidence to publish a story. All you need is to know someone in the federal government who whispers something to you that furthers your employer’s favorite narrative. Just look at these clowns go at it, convincing each other that the sounds made by crickets were caused by a Russian high tech weapon that was frying the brains of U.S personnel. WaPo published DOZENS of these xenophobic articles. How much of our Russia-hate these days is because of journalistic malpractice?

Glenn Greenwald adds (and I agree that this is an easy bet):

This is yet another hoax where any ethical and actual news organization would go on air and say: “for years we told you something that turned out to be false. Here’s why we did it. We apologize and retract our stories.”

That they don’t tells you all you need to know about them.

I just checked (March 1, 2023 at 11pm CT): The corporate media refusing to mention that the story was a hoax include: NYT, NPR, MSNBC and CNN.