Elon’s Musk has announced that his “pronouns” are “Prosecute/Fauci.” This is over the top for me, yet Musk has the right to say this and I have the right to criticize Musk that it’s over the top. That’s how free speech works. We don’t yet know enough to prosecute Fauci. Maybe we never will. Maybe Fauci is completely innocent of the things Musk wants to “prosecute.”

I don’t know all the facts about Fauci, but I know enough of them to be suspicious. There are a LOT of suspicious facts. I want very much to get to the bottom of this because COVID disrupted the lives of billions of people and hurt or killed millions of them. Since when do we ignore calamitous situations just because someone calls them a conspiracy theory, someone like David Frum (who doesn’t understand the import of major media coordinating with the U.S. spy state to squelch the story of Hunter Biden’s laptop)? Stevemur wrote an excellent response to Frum:

In invite you to walk through stevemur’s thread, step by step, then ask yourself whether you too are suspicious.  Note stevemur’s conclusions:

It is not an appropriate response to suspicious facts to tell someone to simply shut the fuck up. I know that the proper response to suspicious facts is to investigate them. That’s what we should do regarding Anthony Fauci.

If what you’ve seen so far is not enough to make you pro-investigation, sleep on this 2016 statement by Peter Daszak of Ecohealth:

Isn’t it time to follow the facts where they lead instead of allowing the legacy news media preach to us, gaslight us and belittle us? After all, this would not be the first time they fucked up big time.

[Dec 11 11:40 pm.]

Musk doubles down.

A gain of function mashup . . .

[Added Dec 14, 2022]

Steve Kirsch offers people 13 questions to ask their doctors regarding the COVID Vaccine. He wrote that people should be free to plagiarize his list, so here they are:

1. 1. Can you tell me why the authorities all over the world (except FL Surgeon General Joe Ladapo) ignore the evidence IN PEER REVIEWED JOURNALS by the world’s top scientists SHOWING the COVID vaccine is killing people?
   2. Can you tell me how we can be assured that the mRNA sequence is intact at the time of injection when the FDA whistleblower at the Johnson committee admitted there is no quality control? This was a well-known problem before the vaccine was approved (the European regulator complained about it), but there was NEVER ANY EVIDENCE they FIXED the problem. If there is evidence, where is it? Without 100% mRNA integrity, the vaccine can’t work, right? How do you know? The drug companies haven’t done any studies and they PROHIBIT anyone from doing these studies. If it is safe and effective, why the prohibition on research studies? Heck, we don’t even know if the mRNA sequence being delivered is the same as what was in the trials.
   3. The strange blood clots, it’s impossible for these foot long (or more) amyloid clots featured in the movie Died Suddenly to form post-mortem. There is a very plausible mechanism of action for the vaccine causing these. And these clots have been seen, in some cases, in over 90% of embalming cases by embalmers all over the world. It only started AFTER the vaccine rolled out. So if it isn’t the vaccine causing these strange novel clots, what is?
   4. Why won’t any government in the world allow independent research on the vaccines? We need to characterize what happens when people are injected with degraded mRNA. NOBODY is allowed to do any INDEPENDENT research on the vaccines to find out critical safety questions.
   5. Maddie de Garay (who was 12 years old when she entered the Pfizer trial for was paralyzed for life from the Pfizer shot. The paralysis started LESS THAN 24 hours after the shot. IT WAS NEVER REPORTED as an adverse event. If it was, show me where. Isn’t this corruption that the medical community should be up in arms about? 1 child in 1,000 being paralyzed and they ignore it?!
   6. If the vaccines aren’t killing people, then why, in a random sample of 35 deaths in Germany within 20 days of the vaccine, are most of them clustered within 2 days of vaccination? They should have been randomly distributed over the 20 day period.
   7. Can you tell me why the CDC *deliberately* ignored the DEATH safety signal generated by the VAERS system for the COVID vaccine?
   8. Can you tell me why there are over 15,000 *EXCESS* deaths for the COVID vaccine (over baseline deaths normally reported in VAERS after vaccination). This is unprecedented. If it isn’t the vaccine, what is it? It is not “overreporting” based on physician surveys, nor is there any evidence of gaming. What is the more likely explanation if it isn’t the vaccine? Also, you have to multiply that number by 41 since VAERS is underreported by at least that amount.
   9. Can you tell me why the Chair of the ACIP committee *REFUSED* to see the authenticated safety data from the Israeli Ministry of Health *PROVING* that the COVID vaccines cause severe adverse events that do NOT resolve over time?
   10. Can you tell me why a Silicon Valley neurologist with 20,000 patients has seen 1,000 vaccine related injuries from the COVID vaccine in the last two years that qualify to be VAERS reportable? # of VAERS reportable vaccine injuries in the last 11 years: ZERO. If the vaccines are safe and effective, how do you explain that? Do you want to talk to her?
   11. Can you tell me why the German medical insurance data (covering 72M German residents) showed more than a 10X increase in the ICD10 code for sudden death IMMEDIATELY after the COVID19 vaccines rolled out in Germany? This is an~ 80M person database. It’s not cherry picking. It was not COVID… sudden death stats didn’t move at all in 2020.
   12. Can you tell me why masks work when BOTH randomized trials (Denmark and Bangladesh) *FAILED* to find a signal. How could both trials have missed such a strong effect? In Bangladesh, the curves for the purple masked and unmasked OVERLAPPED each other. They were INDISTINGUISHABLE. If the masks work, why couldn’t we see a difference? It’s in their OWN data… we looked at the Github repo they gave us. And the first author, Yale Professor Jason Abaluck, got destroyed when he was asked to defend his study. We have the video. Do you want to see it? Can you explain why Science didn’t respond to famous British mathematics Professor Norman Fenton when he asked them to correct or retract the paper? If Fenton got it wrong, why didn’t Science show him how he was wrong? Here’s the chart for the purple clot masks vs. people who didn’t wear masks. Can you see which one is more effective? This is directly from the data in the study but for some really odd reason, this never made it into the paper. Can you believe that? Do you know why?

       

   13. Why did dozens of highly respected scientists suddenly go rogue and independently become “misinformation spreaders” after these vaccines rolled out? Paul Marik, Bret Weinstein, Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, Aseem Malhotra, Byram Bridle, etc… all highly respected with no history of conspiracy theories and they are all saying the SAME thing. In fact, some of us believed the narrative and took the vaccine (including me, Malone, Marik, Malhotra, …). If there is no science to justify skepticism, what motivated these people to TRASH their careers and reputations?

Looking forward to hearing from you on the answers.

It would do a lot to change my mind (and the minds of my fellow misinformation spreaders) if you can explain these. You would save thousands of lives if you would please answer these simple questions for us.

Thank you so much.

-steve