The concept of using “race”–physical appearance–as a proxy for character is as absurd as astrology. I’m well aware that people look different from each other, but the concept of “race” is scientifically baseless. The concept of “race” embraces the logic of astrology: shoving individual people (each of whom is complex) into a handful of simplistic superficial categories and then drawing conclusions that are evidence-free (or often, contrary to evidence) based upon these unwarranted simplistic cartoon-like categorizations. The concept of “race” should be constantly ridiculed the same way that intelligent people ridicule astrology. Any attempt to classify another human being by “race” or birthdate is a lazy ham-handed anti-scientific and pernicious claim that one knows what it is impossible to know–the complexity of that human being–without investing time and effort to get to known them. That is the point of Morgan Freeman:
This enormous flaw with the modern use of the concept of “race” is a conceptual hole so vast that one could easily drive a truck through it. Yet the concept of “race” is rarely attacked at the root. The first racist act is categorizing people by dividing them into simplistic categories such as white or Black. Without this first move, racism would be impossible. What is especially distressing is that this widespread exuberant willingness to mis-categorize people into simplistic categories is embraced by both White Supremacists and those who claim to be seeking social justice by embracing critical race theory. These two groups are now in complete agreement that we can somehow know people merely by looking at their physical appearance.
There is only one way to get to know a person, and that is to take the time to learn about them, one by one, by talking with them, getting to know what they’ve done with their lives, reading about them or watching them interact with others. Complicating things, people change over time, so getting to know who they are requires non-stop effort. Getting to know someone else requires careful consideration of real world facts and this takes considerable and concerted effort. Taking the time to get to really know other people before casting judgment on who they are is incompatible with making snap judgments but, as we are increasingly being tuned by social media, we are increasingly people who insist on making snap judgments.
Every day, “race” arguments wildly launch off into a thousand directions like fireworks. The basic premise of most of these arguments is the incoherent concept of “race,” a concept so completely and irrevocably broken that most of these discussions are a waste of time before the discussion even begins. Imagine the time we could save–time we could redirect to working on solving the immense social problems that are very real indeed (many of them correlated to the physical appearance of groups of people)–if only we cut off most discussions of “race” at the root by calling out the invalidity of the concept of “race.”
I will be writing more on this emotionally-charged topic in coming months. At this point I should make two things clear.
A) As I hope I’ve made clear, “race” is a irretrievably flawed pernicious concept. I believe that the concept of “race” should be thrown in the dustbin of history and we should all enter a new post-racial era. Unfortunately, other people continue to believe in the reality of “race.” This idiotic willingness to divide complex people into simple colors makes racism possible. For this reason, I fully acknowledge the existence and destructiveness of racism. Many people mistreat others based upon physical appearance. To do this is unfair. It hurts people, sometimes badly, sometimes leading to deaths. Racism oppresses entire groups of people and has done so systematically over long stretches of time, through the entire history of the United States and many other places. Wherever we encounter racism, we should attack it vigorously in two ways: socially (by calling it out publicly and condemning those who mistreat other people in this way) and through the use of the legal system (e.g., through civil rights laws).
B) The concept of “race” itself is bad science, and this problem needs to be pointed out whenever discussing racism. Every single time. Even young children know that “race” makes no sense but we socialize them to think otherwise. To fail to point out the absurdity of the concept of “race” whenever discussing racism will lead to more of the same. We will never be able to solve the “race” problem as long as we assume that there is such a thing as “race.” One way to do this is to consistently put the word “race” in scare quotes, which is now my habit. Every time we discuss “race,” we need to call out that the the casual, unthinking idea that there is such a thing as “race” is reckless and dangerous. We need to constantly call out that it is impossible and destructive to judge other people by the use of immutable physical appearance. It is, indeed, as insane as believing in astrology, phrenology or palm reading. The unthinking use of the word “race” is utterly unscientific and destructive, even when used by well-intentioned people. The concept of “race” is a mental virus that hurts people and most of those who are infected are unable to see that they are infected. To use “race” uncritically (or “critically,” as is de rigeour among the Woke) is to succumb to the banality of evil–unthinking destructive acquiescence to bad ideas.
In sum, racism exists because millions of misguided people believe in the incoherent and unsubstantiated notion of “race.” It will take great effort to break this bad habit because many well-meaning people who are (oftentimes heroically) fighting racism refuse to jettison the concept of “race.” Until large vocal swaths of society simultaneously and consciously embrace both A and B (above), racism will tear us apart. I’m not optimistic.
—
[Added March 2, 2022]
I’m more optimistic now after listening to Sheena Mason explain that we are all raceless and that we deserve to be raceless. It’s a long interview and well worth watching the entire thing. I was teary eyed after hearing her discuss the challenges she has faced in life, yet she is incredibly upbeat and thoughtful.
Here are a few of Sheena Mason’s recent Tweets on this topic:
“There is only one way to get to know a person, and that is to take the time to learn about them, one by one” Too slow for the power-hungry. Better route to power is divisive tribalism.
The concept of gene pool has value in medicine. Practitioners use “race” as a shortcut to describe much more than skin color. Even skin color is useful in medicine, alerting a practitioner to be sensitive to Vitamin D deficiency in dark-skinned patients and to melanoma in light-skinned patients. I consulted a pharmacologist about medication for a patient; his first questions were skin and hair color, because pasty-faced redheads usually reacted differently than most others in this particular case. Thank God he asked, the patient was a pasty-faced redhead. Neither of us categorizes character or worthiness by “race.” It’s just that some gene pools create certain strengths and certain vulnerabilities or proclivities. After your second autopsy you learn to disregard the irrelevant.
For some of us it goes beyond that. Every year I donated to my friend/dentist’s fraternity scholarship fund for Black Engineers. After about five years I asked him what prompted him to join that fraternity, the Society of Black Engineers. He took a few seconds before replying that he was black. I honestly had never noticed. My eyesight is poor and, separately, I have few visual skills. I navigate the world principally by sound. I also appear to be on the ultra-high-functioning end of the autism spectrum.When a waitress says, “If you need anything, my name is Janet” it took me years to work up the courage to ask what her name was if I didn’t need anything. I’m still not 100% certain I understood why she thought that was funny. Her skin color? Why is that relevant?
Saying “race doesn’t matter to me” is offensive to some because it delegitimizes their experience as a marginalized person. I have a friend who is a well-known author. We discussed marginalized people many times, and I finally said my impression of her was that she was a tad pudgy, of multiple ethnic backgrounds, a gender-queer of some type, and a genius at writing. Those were, to her, important parts of her identity, therefor part of my impression. After 49 years of marriage I still can’t give a reliable description of my wife to anybody. God help her if she’s kidnapped.
Twitter nails it.