For centuries, established religions have asserted that science should be viewed through the lens of religion. Over the past few years, scientifically-oriented writers have turned that view on its head. They have asserted that it is more appropriate to view religious practices through the lens of science.
The recent flurry of books includes the following:
- Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought, by Pascal Boyer (2002)
- The Human Story, by Robin Dunbar (2004)
- Breaking the Spell, by Daniel Dennett (2006)
- Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society, By David Sloan Wilson (2003)
- How We Believe, by Michael Shermer (1999)
- Why God’s Persist, by Robert Hinde (1999)
- The End of Faith, by Sam Harris (2004)
- Attachment, Evolution and the Psychology of Religion, by Lee Kirkpatrick (2005)
- In Gods We Trust, by Scott Atran (2002)
Though I own each of these books, I have completely read only half of them; I’m partly through the others. They are a priority on my reading list given the high stakes of failing to understand religious practices (religious tensions and wars everywhere one cares to look).
For anyone just getting started in this area, I recommend Dennett’s 2006 work, Breaking the Spell. This book is classic Dennett: eloquent, heartfelt and clear. He works extra hard so that he is not only preaching to the choir. He spends the first one-hundred pages working to convince Believers to give him a chance. It’s quite an extraordinary opening gambit.
Most of the above books concern …