The Missouri supreme court has ruled that a law banning sexually explicit billboards is--gasp!-- unconstitutional. This should come as a surprise to no one. But of course religious groups are stunned. They will try to appeal. Personally, I resent all the JESUS! billboards and the propagandistic ones that declare Pornography…
Humans are creatures with limited attentional capacity. We don’t have the time or brainpower to personally investigate every claim that comes our way. We don’t like questioning ideas to which we’ve become accustomed. Evil-minded people only need to get those lies into our heads. Once in there, those false ideas rattle around for a long time. How to best get false information into people’s heads? Employ a Trojan horse maneuver, i.e., plant credible-seeming information into our brains when we are young using credible intermediaries (such as our parents) through the use of the mass media. And it always helps if the proponents of deceit are well-financed while the proponents of the truth are not. Once false information is safely in their heads, humans are willing to carry it around for decades, disseminating it to yet others and even fighting for it. No, I’m not writing about Iraq. Today’s case study is cow milk. Yeah, the kind of milk you probably drink. Why drink milk? You’ve probably seen lots of those slick ad campaigns. You’ll hear lots of claims that it is important for humans to drink cow milk. Before I go further, here are my disclaimers. For my first 4 ½ decades on this planet, I poured milk on my cereal. About five years ago, my wife and I began to suspect that our youngest daughter was lactose intolerant. People who are lactose intolerant can’t properly digest milk. We thus switched over to soy milk for her. I also switched …
After reading the Cato report about terrorism, I suddenly realized why Republicans have been so gung-ho to declare "war" against terrorism: because it's the easiest war in town. The odds that any American will die from a terrorist attack are microscopic, so what better thing to declare "war" against than…
Is terrorism really the biggest threat facing the United States? TomPaine.com recently commented on a report of the libertarian Cato Institute arguing that terrorism is really just not that big of a threat to the average person. For instance, about as many Americans have been killed by terrorists as have been…
A couple days ago, after much work and careful deliberation, a federal court declared the obvious:
A federal judge Thursday ruled that cigarette makers were liable for a decades-long conspiracy to hide the dangers of smoking but declined to impose financial penalties on the industry.
In her 1,653 page opinion, U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler wrote:
Cigarette smoking causes disease, suffering, and death. Despite internal recognition of this fact, defendants have publicly denied, distorted, and minimized the hazards of smoking for decades.
Why is this story even news? The dangers of tobacco and the deceit of tobacco companies have long been obvious. There has never been a more damning case against any industry. See here. See also, the Executive Summary of Preliminary Proposed Finding of Fact in US v. Philip Morris, et al.
…Cigarette smoking and exposure to secondhand smoke kills nearly 440,000 Americans every year. The annual number of deaths due to cigarette smoking is substantially greater than the annual number of deaths due to illegal drug use, alcohol consumption, automobile accidents, fires, homicides, suicides and AIDS combined. Approximately one out of every five deaths that occur in the United States is caused by cigarette smoking.
At the end of 1953, the chief executives of the five major cigarette manufacturers in the United States at the time – Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, Lorillard, and American – met at the Plaza Hotel in New York City with representatives of the public relations firm Hill