The imperative phrase is proclaimed on millions of bumper stickers: “Support the Troops.”
Tell me what it means to “support the troops” and then I’ll tell you whether I support the troops. Fair enough? Until you can tell me what the phrase means, asking me whether I “support the troops” is like asking me to sign a blank check. I don’t sign blank checks.
The vague phrase “Support the troops” is a challenge that is not only found on bumper stickers these days. For instance, Bill Arkin of the Washington Post recently wrote about soldiers who are increasingly expressing frustration with the growing opposition to the war back home. Many of the soldiers took it personally. Arkin quotes Staff Sergeant Manuel Sahagun:
One thing I don’t like is when people back home say they support all troops, but they don’t support the war. If they’re going to support us, support us all the way.
Arkin goes so far as to characterize the volunteer troops as “mercenaries,” suggesting that we’d be having an entirely different national discussion if we had a draft. Arkin’s “mercenary” comment quickly caused a firestorm. Overnight, his blog drew more than 900 comments. Arkin also drew the ire of conservatives from coast to coast. Did he fail to “support the troops”?
“Support the troops” is a hopelessly vague phrase; it means different things to different people. For instance, when I am asked whether I support the troops, it could mean any of the following things:
1. Do …
