Ways to support the #Occupy movement

If you would like to support the #occupy movement, but you don't want to sleep overnight in a city park, here's an article listing ways for you to help. Item number three on the list is that you shouldn't hesitate to speak up.

I know people who absolutely support the ideology of OWS, but who remain silent as church mice on the topic. I also know people who kinda like the idea, but aren’t really sure they want to align themselves just yet. Here’s a little tough love for you: If you’re not helping, you’re hindering. That’s the truth of it. We all have our lives, our work, the pressing needs of our unique realities to deal with. But out there are hundreds of people taking a break from their own demanding realities to sleep on the ground, in the rain, making themselves vulnerable to police aggression and whatever other intrusions come with sleeping night after night in a public place under scrutiny. If you like the idea of OWS, and feel excited about the sorts of changes we might begin to see in our society, say so. Out loud. To friends, family and partners. On the internet. In line at the grocery store. Talk to people. Talk about the movement. Apathy’s not cool any more.

Continue ReadingWays to support the #Occupy movement

High school pundits and candidates

A television was installed in my workplace cafeteria this year and it has been an immense source of irritation and revelation regarding the garbage that passes for TV news. Today, I heard a few minutes of discussion by these three women at CNN: What did these CNN pundits discuss today? 1) Horserace politics--who is polling well at the moment, and how will the various candidates do in the various primaries, with barely a mention of how they stand on the issues; 2) An allegation that a candidate flip-flopped; 3) A claim that Candidate A dissed Candidate B, and 4) Did you see that strange  latest campaign ad by Candidate D? This is what passes for serious political commentary today on a major television network.  It's high school all over again. Not only are the pundits engaging in this stunning shallowness, but the candidates are responding in kind. These people remind me of those vapid adolescents who thought it was a life and death matter to win a seat on student council, even though they didn't actually know why they were running other than to be cool. The pundits are like the high schoolers who endlessly swap gossip in the halls. The candidate students end up turning high school elections into personality cults, and that's exactly how we are running our media and our country today. Everywhere we look we see lots of emotionally and intellectually stunted people awash in money and basking with their BFF's in front of camera lenses. Here's what happens when we allow elections become tribal: The voters ease into candidates like they adopt a sports teams and they fight for their candidates out of loyalty and in-group cravings, blinded by the confirmation bias roaring full blast. They get all exercised by the pundits, who are acting as though they are conveying meaningful news, and the networks dress it all up with slick graphics, music and sets to make it look like the information is "news." Many of those who watch this garbage assume that they are informed on the issues of the day. We need to change our ways. We need to start choosing candidates like we shop for consumer goods that have no prestige. I''m not referring to our purchases of cars or clothes, but rather consider the way we shop for things like water heaters and dishwashers. In choosing political candidates, we need to get past all of the brand name loyalties and pettiness and we need to start insisting on well-informed answers to tough questions about how our candidates plan to run the country. We need to turn off the TV when high schoolish pundits try to manufacture conflict that distracts from serious issues. We need to leave all of these high schoolers, candidates and pundits, in the dust, because we have a big complex country to run, and none of them appear to be up to it.

Continue ReadingHigh school pundits and candidates

Trump Bashing

Lawrence O'Donnell has made some stunning claims about Donald Trump. While Trump was "running for president," why weren't these issues front and center for the media?   After all, there's a long way to fall from successful billionaire to financial failure-liar.   I don't know how accurate O'Donnell is, but he looks every bit as confident as Trump looked when Trump was allegedly running for president.    If there is truth to O'Donnell's claim that Trump is a billionaire, why did the media so readily call him "billionaire" as opposed to "alleged billionaire"?   I'll be watching to hear more about these allegations, but I suspect that they are true based upon a gut feeling and based on ample evidence that the modern American media excels at serving as the stenographer for (allegedly) powerful media-savvy people.

Continue ReadingTrump Bashing

Your great great grandparents were sponges, and their great grandparents were fungi

About 10 years ago, I had the opportunity to view a set of videos called "The Shape of Life." It was an amazing journey because it suggested that the earliest animal ancestor of human beings was the sponge. I watched this video several times, because I had trouble wrapping my mind around this finding. It was an excellent set of videos that I still highly recommend. The mind-boggling conclusion that we are descendants of sponges was reinforced in my mind back in November, 2004, when I read a fascinating article about our ancestors in discover magazine, pulling out the article: "This Is Your Ancestor." It is a story of an evolutionary microbiologist named Mitchell Sogin, who wanted to know the animal from which all other animals came. He extrapolated backwards from today's oldest known species: jellyfish, sea anemones, sponges, mollusks and starfish.  When he grouped each of these organisms according to their first appearance on Earth, the most likely candidate appeared to be the sponge. As the Discover article points out, sponges don't look much like animals, though they are truly animals, not plants, and there are 9,000 species of sponges on the planet.

Sponges are multicellular, but the cells don’t add up to much: no tissues, muscles, organs, nerves, or brain. But this simplicity can be deceptive. Some sponges come armed with glasslike skeletal spikes, microscopic and as beautiful as snowflakes. . . . Sponges are the earliest, most primitive multicelled animal, Sogin says. Some scientists believe the ability to grow different cell types started animals on the evolutionary road to becoming humans. With just a few kinds of cells, only loosely connected, the sponge manages to produce a variety of as symmetrical shapes, from cups and fans to tubes and piecrust shapes. Sponges survive handsomely on their own and can even shelter other sea creatures… Sponges are also the earliest sexual re-producers; most are hermaphroditic, producing both eggs and sperm which they release into the water.… Sponges don't just sit still-many actually move… One sponge moves 4 millimeters a day.
Sogin used an innovative ribosomal RNA analysis and he worked at it for more than 20 years. His conclusions are stunning:
The sponge was indeed at the base of animal lineage, and just above it were the cnidarians, such as jellyfish, anemones and corals. They, like the sponge, have a saclike body form. They developed tentacles and an opening like a mouth at one end. But there were other forms of life lower down the line of descent that scientists might not have expected. Suddenly, they made sense. One of the sponges cell types is the distinctively shaped choanocyte, a cell equipped with a tiny long filament, called a flagellum, surrounded by a collar studded with even tinier hairs called microvilli. Thousands of these flagella beat constantly at the water and move it past the sponges feeding cells. As it happens, Sogin found that the sponges' immediate evolutionary predecessors are the choanoflagellates, which represent what life would have looked like just before animals in the form of sponges emerged. Scientists had long suspected that the choanoflagellates could have been the nearest things to animals without actually being animals.
The Discover article then points out that the only thing older than the choanoflagellates in the same line of organisms are the fungi.  Sogin has determined that "fungi and plants are very different from each other, and fungi are actually more closely related to animals. [W]e share a common, unique evolutionary history with fungi." The same article points out that this common evolutionary heritage of fungi and animals explains "why fungal infections are so difficult to treat--they're more like us than we thought. They are similar targets." Therefore, the next time you see a sponge, show some respect, since sponges are the first multicellular animals, and "all the other animals emerged from this imple architecture and are built upon this platform." What animal would be find a bit upstream from sponges? Worms, another of our ancestors. Worms are "the first creatures with bilateral symmetry." The worm, along with fungi and sponges, organisms highly deserving of your respect because they are in your line of ancestry. For more about sponges, see my 2006 post titled "My Life as a Sponge." For a quick ride down the evolutionary highway, visit this post.

Continue ReadingYour great great grandparents were sponges, and their great grandparents were fungi

Big fossil fuel campaigns claim that dirty fuels are green

At Occasional Planet, Mike Davis discusses the ubiquitous TV commercials touting the green-ness of natural gas and Canadian tar-sand oil. At my workplace lunchroom, there is a TV, and I've seen these misleading commercials many times. I've also seen many recent ads for "clean coal," even though no such coal plants exist. Interesting how the industry never even attempts to argue that coal ash is "clean." Mike notes a lack of media stories critical of these ads, not surprising given the ad revenue the media receives for running these commercials.

Continue ReadingBig fossil fuel campaigns claim that dirty fuels are green