Cool new museum wing, but I don’t get the art.

The St. Louis Art Museum has spent a ton of money, $160M, on a brand new wing, which I visited Sunday. It's spacious and bright. It's an inviting space for viewing art. There were a few dozen works of art in the new wing, and here are but a few: Mississippi Circle. These are limestone rocks. IMG_9542 This piece is called Octagon, and it is a dyed canvas. IMG_9549 This work of art is called Fluorescent Lights. It is made of a long fluorescent light. IMG_9553 You can probably already guess my reaction: The Emperor Has No Clothes. I hate to feel and sound so negative, but very few of the works of "art" in the new wing caused any reaction in me other than sadness that they had spend so much to display such unimpressive things. I imagined all the groupthink that went in to the planning. I am sad to think that there are so many talented artists out there, in so many new and alternative media, yet the above efforts are the things that get the primo space in the St. Louis art museum. This is most certainly art that does not offend. Perhaps that is the point--after all, the museum agenda is controlled by well-to-do people. We certainly don't want art that spawns social justice. Maybe we are filling this space with stuff, so that we don't need to make difficult decisions about what kind of challenging art would take its place. this display makes me want to administer a secret ballot survey to those visitors who view these works. That survey would include questions like these (along with my predicted answers: 1. Do you consider the above 3 items works of art? (22% yes). 2. Do you consider the above 3 items impressive works of art? (3% yes). 3. Should these works be replaced by something else? (95% would say yes with regard to 75% of these works) Again, I am saddened to write this. I want to be proud of my city's new art museum.

Continue ReadingCool new museum wing, but I don’t get the art.

Former GOP Senator Gordon Humphrey speak up for Edward Snowden

Glenn Greenwald verified then published this letter from former GOP Senator Gordon Humphrey to Edward Snowden. Snowden then responded. I continue to be impressed by the care Snowden has gone in presenting information, literally and between the lines.

Continue ReadingFormer GOP Senator Gordon Humphrey speak up for Edward Snowden

Who qualifies as a journalist? The failures of the new DOJ guidelines.

Free Press reports on the new DOJ guidelines:

Last Friday, the Justice Department released revised guidelines governing the Department’s interactions with the press. President Obama had ordered Attorney General Eric Holder to conduct the review in response to the news earlier this year that the DoJ had obtained the phone records of Associated Press reporters and editors and the emails of a Fox News reporter.
One of the main issues is whether citizen journalists (e.g., many serious writers/reporters/investigators who run their own websites to report the new) will have any protection at all. This article warns that the federal government is moving in the direction of declaring an "official press," deeming who is a journalist and who is not. This, in the digital age where citizen journalists are making a tremendous impact on news gathering.

Continue ReadingWho qualifies as a journalist? The failures of the new DOJ guidelines.

The scourge of patent trolls

Electronic Frontier Foundation reports:

Thanks to trolls like IPNav, the Times explains, U.S. companies are forced to spend upwards of $30 billion every year on patent litigation. Most of that money goes to troll profits and legal expenses, with less than 25 percent flowing to inventors. Even Spangenberg concedes that his business uses “the courts as a marketplace, and the courts are horribly inefficient and horribly expensive as a market.” Patent trolls like IPNav are a symptom of a fundamentally broken system.
According to the NYT:
There is debate about the definition of patent trolls, but the term broadly refers to people who sue companies for infringement, often using patents of dubious value or questionable relevance, and then hold on like a terrier until they get license fees. In recent years, patent trolls — they prefer “patent assertion entities,” or P.A.E.’s — have gone from low-profile corporate migraine to mainstream scourge. This is partly because the number of patent infringement suits has more than doubled in recent years, to 4,731 cases in 2012 from 2,304 in 2009, according to that RPX report. The cost to businesses, which pass along the expense to consumers, is immense. One study found that United States companies — most of them small or medium-sized — spent $29 billion in 2011 on patent assertion cases.

Continue ReadingThe scourge of patent trolls