I very much enjoyed this spontaneous free flowing conversation between Joe Rogan and Bill Maher. It's such a change of pace from the orchestrated filtered corporate bullshit we get in many other places these days.
Jonathan Haidt wrote about the deep meaning of trigger warnings back in 2015 in his article, "THE CODDLING OF THE AMERICAN MINDIn the name of emotional well-being, college students are increasingly demanding protection from words and ideas they don’t like. Here’s why that’s disastrous for education—and mental health."
This new climate is slowly being institutionalized, and is affecting what can be said in the classroom, even as a basis for discussion. During the 2014–15 school year, for instance, the deans and department chairs at the 10 University of California system schools were presented by administrators at faculty leader-training sessions with examples of microaggressions. The list of offensive statements included: “America is the land of opportunity” and “I believe the most qualified person should get the job.” . . . The current movement is largely about emotional well-being. More than the last, it presumes an extraordinary fragility of the collegiate psyche, and therefore elevates the goal of protecting students from psychological harm. The ultimate aim, it seems, is to turn campuses into “safe spaces” where young adults are shielded from words and ideas that make some uncomfortable. And more than the last, this movement seeks to punish anyone who interferes with that aim, even accidentally. You might call this impulse vindictive protectiveness. It is creating a culture in which everyone must think twice before speaking up, lest they face charges of insensitivity, aggression, or worse."
At Common Sense, Zoe Strimpel has written an article titled "How Feminism Got Hijacked. The movement that once declared “I am woman, hear me roar” can no longer define what a woman is. What happened?"
In this article, Strimpel refers to this March 31 2022 Headline in The Washington Post:
What follows is an excerpt from Strimpel's excellent article:
Post-Feminist Feminism has morphed into a dark, strange Anti-Feminism. Anti-Feminism borrows from the language of liberation, but it’s not about liberating women. It’s about pushing women out of college sports. It’s about telling girls they aren’t lesbians or tomboys, but in fact men struggling to find themselves.
It is the madness that led a storied American newspaper to run an anti-woman (or de-woman-ed) headline—garnering roughly 1,400 comments (almost all negative) before shutting down the comments section. It is the trap that ensnared a Supreme Court nominee, who had acquitted herself with great aplomb and suddenly found herself at the end of an ideological cul de sac. To attempt an answer, any answer, to the question—Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman’?—would be to re-center women, biological sex, the concrete, mundane experience of ordinary, boring, bourgeois and working-class and very poor women the world over. It would be to attempt to undo the hijacking of the feminist cause and to return it to the people for whom that cause was created so many decades ago.
Returning the cause to the people for whom it was created is the only way to save it, and to stop the many discriminations that girls and women still face: domestic violence; the economic and psychological penalty of having babies; the manifold hurts and crimes visited upon countless women in non-Western countries simply for being women. For now, doing anything about all of that is a fantasy. First, we have to honor the actual meaning of words, like woman. We have to insist that those meanings are important. We have to go back, again, to first principles. That is the only way forward.
I will never stop using the word "woman" to refer to the women in my life, whether they be my mom, my daughters, my sisters and my friends. I do so proudly and publicly. I will speak out strongly against those people who use the word "women" only in private (especially liberals who agree with me but who are too cowardly to speak out). In the meantime, we see headlines like this: "Two inmates at all-women's New Jersey jail are PREGNANT after both had sex with transgender prisoners: ACLU won battle to house 27 trans inmates there."
Colin Wright is a biologist who wanted to teach at a university. He explains his interview process in this video. The universities only cared about two types of diversity: 1. Physical appearance and 2. Sex and gender identity. They did not care about viewpoint diversity. They did not care about equality, but only about equity (guarantying equal outcomes). Wright believes in hiring the best person for the job, not what they looked like. He believes that it is dehumanizing to deal with others based on their physical appearance or their sexual or gender ideology because this insists that we should reduce human complexity to a single trait. The DEI statements he encountered required him to give assent to segregation based on physical traits.
Wright gave up on his dream of teaching at a university. He hears from many teachers who are self-censoring or lying in order to keep their jobs. His conclusion: Diversity, Equity and Inclusion orthodoxy prevents diversity of thought.
Eric Weinstein's reaction to Wright's video:
Bill Maher explaining Jokes to idiots: Oscar Edition. This is not just about Will Smith. This is about elite intolerance of comedians. Elite colleges are where students go "to lose their sense of humor."
Maher's ending line:
For all those who are constantly demanding an apology for jokes maybe it's you who should apologize to us for all the great jokes that we never got to hear, the brilliant thoughts that were never uttered those are the invisible scars of cancel culture. let's have a moment of silence for that . . .