Vaccines to the Rescue? To What Extent Are Vaccines Responsible for Lowered Rates of Dangerous Infectious Diseases in the U.S.?

To what extent were vaccines responsible for the lowered rates of measles, whooping cough, smallpox, typhoid fever, enteric fever, typhus, scarlet fever and tuberculosis? According to Roman Bystrianyk, not much.

Who is Roman Bystrianyk? Excerpt from Grok:

Roman Bystrianyk is a researcher, author, and software engineer known for his work questioning mainstream narratives about vaccines and infectious diseases. He co-authored Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History with Suzanne Humphries, MD, which argues that the decline in infectious disease mortality in the 19th and early 20th centuries was primarily due to improved sanitation, nutrition, and living conditions rather than medical interventions like vaccines.

Take a look at this chart, then see his Tweet below:

Imagine a massive drop in all infectious diseases—measles, whooping cough, smallpox, typhoid fever, enteric fever, typhus, and especially the biggest killers of the time: scarlet fever and tuberculosis. All of them began to decline around the same time, steadily trending toward zero—with or without vaccines. Smallpox, once feared, became as mild as chickenpox, even as vaccination rates fell.

When we zoom in on the New England states—an area known for better living conditions and access to healthcare—the story becomes even clearer. In 1962, measles-related deaths were almost nonexistent across all six states:

Connecticut: 0 deaths

Maine: 1 death

Massachusetts: 0 deaths

New Hampshire: 0 deaths

Rhode Island: 1 death

Vermont: 3 deaths

Yet we’re still told that vaccines were the main reason for the decline—even though there was never a national vaccination program for scarlet fever or tuberculosis, the diseases that had taken the most lives. And the vaccines for the diseases we hear about nonstop didn’t show up until after the death rates had already dropped by nearly 100%.

Does really looking at the data and history give you a different perspective on vaccination?

Continue ReadingVaccines to the Rescue? To What Extent Are Vaccines Responsible for Lowered Rates of Dangerous Infectious Diseases in the U.S.?

Definition of Vaccine

Matt Taibbi points out the CDC's quiet change to its definition of "vaccine":

In December 2021, the Centers for Disease Control made a change to its definition of “vaccine.” The old one read, “A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.” The new definition removed “immunity,” reading, “A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”

The change was made just ahead of the widespread administration of a Covid vaccine that did not produce immunity:

Continue ReadingDefinition of Vaccine

Senator Ron Johnson Discusses the US Corruption and Incompetence re the COVID “Vax”

Senator Johnson sums up the corruption and incompetence regarding the COVID "vax." I created the transcript (below) based on this post by "Chief Nerd."

Our response to COVID? None of it made sense to me. You know, Peter McCulloch had the four pillars of pandemic response: Try and limit the spread, early treatment, hospital treatment and vaccines. You know, we certainly tried to stop the spread by destroying our economy, destroying small businesses. That didn't make sense, but we completely sabotaged early treatment, hospital treatment. I mean, let's face it, they developed protocols that killed people. You put some you slap somebody on a ventilator, you know, 89% chance they weren't ever going to get off. So everything was directed toward a vaccine.

Very early on, I was talking to the CEO of one of the manufacturers of hydroxychloroquine in April. He's really excited about this. You know, he provided like, 30,000 doses to the national stockpile, and they were going to do all kinds of studies. They're going to come out toward the end of May. But all of a sudden, tail end of April, early May, the communication just went dead silent. It's like everybody in the industry just agreed, we're we're going to focus on the vaccine, nothing else.

And then, fortunately for me, I got connected with Michael Eden, who for 30 years was a [illegible] of Pfizer companies, especially toxicity. He was in the end of his career, the Senior Vice President, in terms of research for Pfizer. He could not believe what his colleagues were developing. He was beside himself. He said, you know, Ron, there's a whole list of ingredients that we do not put into injectables because they're toxic to the body. When I found out that they were going to produce an injectable that caused the body cells, to produce something that was toxic to it. He literally could not believe that. He researched it further and found out exactly what they're going to do. So he came on and became very public of it. And again, fortunately he educated me. There was no way I was ever going to get that injection, and I started trying to warn people very early on.

I'm not a doctor, not a medical researcher, but I just used what information was available publicly. The VAERS report. I'm the first one that probably got censored, with the VAERS chart showing this explosion in deaths associated with COVID 19 vaccine. Now I presented that, I think, end of April, to Francis Collins. I'm talking to Francis Collins. "Are you watching VAERS?" I think at the time, there were a few 1000 deaths. 46% of those deaths were occurring on the day of vaccination, within two days. Wow. So when I confront him with that . . . he said, Senator, people die. That's what a cavalier attitude he had toward that.

Really raised my antenna in terms of the corruption, in terms of CDC, the FDA, the NIH in terms of just ignoring the safety signals that were screaming at them, and they continue to ignore it. They continue to cover it up. So no, I've seen the corruption. We should have always been pushing early treatment we should have been exploring. And by the way, he lied to me the end of December of 2020 when I pressed him from those hearings. What is what is the NIH doing in terms of exploring early treatments? Oh, Senator, we're spending hundreds of millions of dollars on exploring every molecule on the shelf. So go show me where you spend the money. Show me what you've studied. Never got that information.

So again, these guys have been lying to me since, really day one, since the COVID pandemic occurred. And they haven't stopped lying, and they certainly haven't been transparent to American public. So no, I don't, I won't trust them further than I could throw them.

Continue ReadingSenator Ron Johnson Discusses the US Corruption and Incompetence re the COVID “Vax”

The Correlation Between Vaccinations and SIDS

I don't know who to trust any more. So many things that I used to believe have crumbled in the past five years. That said, this correlation between vaccinations and SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) is very concerning. I'd like to know more about this correlation. If these numbers are true, this is a damning indictment of the pharmaceutical industry. Title of the article: "Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature."

Toxicology Reports is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal published by Elsevier, dedicated to all aspects of toxicology research and clinical sciences. Nicholas Hulscher is an epidemiologist.

Continue ReadingThe Correlation Between Vaccinations and SIDS

Must Watch Documentary on COVID Vaccine Adverse Reactions and their Cover-Up: “Follow the Silenced.”

I just finished watching the new documentary, "Follow the Silenced," an allusion to thousands of Americans who were vaccine-injured. I'm irate at the fraud committed by public health officials, legacy media and pharma. Anyone who thinks that our COVID response was anything less than detestable should watch this video. You might have it in your mind that these entities were trying to act in good faith in a difficult set of circumstances.

Bullshit. Why were the % of adverse reactions rigged downward by claiming that a person is not considered vaccinated until WEEKS after the first shot, even though many of the severe injuries were manifest immediately? Watching this documentary, you'll learn that doctors were discouraged from reporting side effects to VAERS. You'll learn that people who suffered severe injuries were ignored. They were told by doctors and public health that they were merely anxious and that they had no injuries even though they were bed-ridden. You'll see the actual numbers that constituted a safety signal while, at the same time, public health official and politicians were telling us to keep pumping these dangerous products into our arms. Like I did. Three times. Without informed consent. Here is the documentary's indictment: in summary form, along with some screenshots from the documentary:

Suppression of Vaccine Injury Stories: Public health authorities, pharmaceutical companies, and the government systematically silenced and censored individuals who experienced severe adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. Victims, such as Brianne Dressen and Ernest Ramirez Sr., were ignored when attempting to share their experiences, pointing to a broader effort to conceal the scope of vaccine injuries.

Illegal Censorship Campaign: The federal government, in collaboration with Stanford University and social media companies, engaged in an illegal censorship campaign that violated the First Amendment rights of vaccine injury victims. This effort allegedly aimed to suppress narratives that questioned the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. For instance, FB shut down numerous groups of organically organized vaccine-injured people.

Abandonment by the Medical Establishment: The medical establishment abandoned vaccine-injured individuals, leaving them without proper care or acknowledgment. Victims were dismissed or neglected by healthcare systems after experiencing life-altering adverse effects.

Cover-Up of Adverse Effects Data: Consider the Defense Medical Database (DMED), where an alleged 1100% increase in neurological diseases among service members was observed in the year following the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines. The Department of Defense shut down access to this data to obscure these findings, a deliberate cover-up. Pfizer's own data (that it attempted to hide) showed 26,000 cases of nervous system disorders in its clinical trials. 24 Hours after Senator Ron Johnson told the Biden WH to preserve DIMED data (that indicated that the vaccines were dangerous) the system went down and then reappeared with doctored data.

Media Complicity in Misinformation: The news media betrayed public trust by aligning with pharmaceutical and government narratives, failing to investigate or report on vaccine injury cases, and contributing to the marginalization of affected individuals. These accusations frame a narrative of systemic misconduct, lack of transparency, and disregard for those harmed by vaccines.

You are invited to view "Follow the Silenced," without charge, here:

Continue ReadingMust Watch Documentary on COVID Vaccine Adverse Reactions and their Cover-Up: “Follow the Silenced.”