Pfizer and “Risk Reduction”

In 2021 I was joyous that Pharma had vaccines that were on the order ot 95% effective. Now we know what that means.

How Pfizer duped billions via statistical manipulation: Pfizer reported that its vaccine shows a 95% efficacy. That sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, right? But that's not actually what that number means. That 95% refers to the relative risk reduction, but it doesn't tell you how much your overall risk is reduced by vaccination.

For that, we need absolute risk reduction. In the Pfizer trial, 8 out of 18,198 people who were given the vaccine developed COVID-19. In the unvaccinated placebo group, 162 people got it, which means that even without the vaccine, the risk of contracting COVID-19 was extremely low at 0.88%, which the vaccine then reduced to 0.04%. So the net benefit or the absolute risk reduction that you're being offered with a Pfizer vaccine is 0.84%. That 95% number, that refers to the relative difference between 0.88 and 0.04%. That's what they call 95% relative risk reduction.

And relative risk reduction is well known to be a misleading number, which is why the FDA recommends using absolute risk reduction instead, which begs the question, how many people would have chosen to take the COVID-19 vaccines had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit?

Continue ReadingPfizer and “Risk Reduction”

Regression into Autism

Of all the vaccine videos I've seen this week, this one is the most haunting. Many case of autism REGRESS into autism. The child is initially healthy. Then, in many cases, shortly after vaccines, the parents notice a shocking loss of function. I've seen several videos where the parents describe this. Admittedly, this is not true of all cases of autism, but it is true of many.

Continue ReadingRegression into Autism

Preprint Warning of mRNA Risks is Censored

People need to be protected from preprint warning of mRNA risks. The article:

"BREAKING: MDPI Censors One of the World’s Most-Read Preprints Showing mRNA Shots Disrupt Thousands of Genes: With over 34,000 views and 8,600 downloads, our study discovered long-lasting genetic disruption from mRNA shots—only to be unethically censored by the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex."

Nicolas Hulscher:

The sheer reach of this work made it impossible for the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex and its online enforcers at PubPeer to ignore. So they pressured Preprints.org into doing something unprecedented: retracting a preprint, an act almost never seen in science.

Infographic from the censored article:

Continue ReadingPreprint Warning of mRNA Risks is Censored

Dr. Aseem Malhotra Criticizes the mRNA COVID Shot

Dr. Aseem Malhotra speaking at the recent Reform UK conference:

Called for a moratorium on COVID mRNA vaccines citing a reanalysis of Pfizer/Moderna trials showing a 2-4 times higher risk of serious harm than hospitalization prevention.

- The World Health Organization that is being captured. That is being captured by Bill Gates, who is largest funder now Bill Gates, who made half a billion dollars in investments in the COVID vaccines.

- Audiences gasped when Dr. Malhotra claimed that COVID vaccines were a significant factor in cancer cases among members of the royal family.

- Calls out Pfizer of pushing COVID-19 vaccine mandates for profit, despite knowing by summer 2021 that the vaccines did not stop infection or transmission, while funding organizations to support these mandates and earning $100 billion.

Continue ReadingDr. Aseem Malhotra Criticizes the mRNA COVID Shot

Today’s Testimony: Vaxed versus Unvaxed

Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier.

“Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center.”

“He was pro-vaccine, running clinical trials.”

“We argued this was the chance to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.”

“To our surprise, he agreed to conduct the study.”

“Dr. Zervos recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. These were mainstream scientists with orthodox views about vaccines.” “

The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines.” “It was based on actual medical records.”

“Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.” “ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group.”

“All of these findings were statistically significant.”

“After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did.”

“Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.”

“The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.”

“We urged the researchers to submit it. They admitted the study was well-designed and conducted.

But Dr. Zervos said he didn’t want to lose his job. Another said she didn’t want to make doctors uncomfortable.”

“This is a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted — how only studies that confirm the belief that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.”

This has been an afternoon of jaw-dropping testimony. What you see above is the tip of the iceberg.

Continue ReadingToday’s Testimony: Vaxed versus Unvaxed