The COVID Vax “causes the heart muscle cells to produce a spike protein correct which is toxic to the body:

This conversation between Senator Ron Johnson and former head of the CDC, Robert Redfield, MD, highlights that the mRNA was synthetically produced to avoid degradation and can persist in the body for at least two months, contrary to initial claims. The spike protein produced by the mRNA is toxic and the lipid nanoparticles in the vaccine can bio-distribute throughout the body, including the brain and reproductive organs.

Transcript

Ron Johnson We were told it was going to stay in our arm, right? Okay? We were told this is mRNA was going to degrade rapidly in our body, right? But it wasn't mRNA. Was it? It was modified RNA. It was actually produced synthetically so it wouldn't degrade. And we now have studies that say the mRNA is circling the body at least, I think, two months, and we haven't done studies beyond that, correct? I know in your own practice, you don't administer that because you realize the spike protein is toxic to the body.

Robert Redfield I prefer the killed protein vaccines.

Ron Johnson When did you first determine, or when did you first find out about the bio distribution studies Pfizer had done, that the Japanese regulators released in February of 2021 regarding the lipid nanoparticles.

Robert Redfield Probably, probably somewhere in the in the spring or summer of 21 it was clear that the mRNA in some patients was persisting much longer than

Ron Johnson

But when did you find out about the bio distribution the lipid nanoparticle, particles, or When did people in the FDA? When should they have known about the fact that they were by distributing all over the body?

Robert Redfield Yeah, I don't know the answer to that. I was telling you the summer of 2021. Is when I probably came more aware that

Ron Johnson Only because the Japanese regulators released that. But again, this is part of the Pfizer studies. So they knew that the lipid nanoparticle, which is designed to permeate difficult-to-permeate barriers, correct. That's the design of the lipid nanoparticle. So they knew it was going to bio distribute all over the body, concentrate in the ovaries, the adrenal glands. It crosses the blood brain barrier, correct,

Robert Redfield correct.

Ron Johnson So what would, let's, let's just, again, you're a doctor, what happens when you have a lipid nanoparticle by distributing and let's say this mRNA, this modified mRNA, attaches to heart muscle. What is it injects itself into the cells, causes that heart muscle cell to produce a spike protein correct which is toxic to the body. And then, what does the body do?

Robert Redfield It has a very strong pro inflammatory response, which is problematic. Again, I think Senator, what you're getting at, which I'm 100% agreeing with you, is, I think there was not appropriate transparency from the beginning about the potential side effects of these vaccines. And I do think there was inappropriate decisions by some to try to under-report any side effects, because they argued that would make the public less likely to get vaccinated. I do think one of the greatest mistakes that was made, of course, was mandating these vaccines. They should have never been mandated. It should have been open to personal choice. They don't prevent infection. They do have side effects.

https://x.com/valerieanne1970/status/1999105905460187408?s=43

Continue ReadingThe COVID Vax “causes the heart muscle cells to produce a spike protein correct which is toxic to the body:

The News Media Used to Cover Vaccine Injuries

Once upon a time, the news media covered vaccine injuries.  Then they didn't.

"A Midwestern Doctor" has published a long article with the proof that the news media used to aggressively cover the dangers of vaccines.  The title: "Vaccine Amnesia: Why Did The Media Stop Covering Vaccine Disasters? Forgotten news segments show how widely acknowledged vaccine injuries were before the media was bought out by the pharmaceutical industry."

Bullet points from this article:

•Something about vaccines (e.g., their promise of a simple injection being sufficient to safely and effectively end all diseases) has always deeply appealed to the minds of government officials.

•Unfortunately, that promise is often a lie, so over and over, unsafe and ineffective vaccines enter the market. When this happens, the officials who are invested in them do everything they can to protect the vaccines from scrutiny and cover up each red flag that emerges and the medical field has dutifully complied.

•In previous decades, the press was much less corrupt than it is now and occasionally would air real investigations into what happened which highlighted the immense suffering many have faced.

•Collectively, these segments both show how much more candid the media used to be about the issues, and how closely many of the things discussed back then are exactly the same as the lies we face now.

•Since those TV programs made many who were suffering from the vaccine injuries realize they were not alone, this created a massive PR problem the vaccine industry, which was eventually solved by preventing any future segments from airing.

•This article was written in the hope that collective amnesia could be broken as we are now at the precipice of the pharmaceutical industry’s grip over the media being broken. For that reason, in this article, I compiled 54 news reports on the dangers of vaccination which have been almost entirely forgotten and would never be aired today.

Continue ReadingThe News Media Used to Cover Vaccine Injuries

Senator Ron Johnson: Federal Public Health Officials Hid the Dangers of the COVID Shot

"Senator Ron Johnson has now stated—on record—that federal health officials knowingly concealed vaccine risk signals instead of warning the public. His words were unambiguous: “They admitted there was a signal on myocarditis, and they hid it. They didn’t warn the public, they didn’t warn doctors.” Then he laid out the data straight from VAERS: “The VAERS system shows 38,742 deaths reported… and 9,252 of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination, or within one or two days.” He added that federal agencies initially promoted VAERS as a trusted safety surveillance system, until the results showed what they “didn’t like.”

Continue ReadingSenator Ron Johnson: Federal Public Health Officials Hid the Dangers of the COVID Shot

Vinay Prasad Reviews the Risks and Benefits of the COVID Shots

Vinay Prasad is the Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). He also serves as the agency's Chief Medical and Scientific Officer, overseeing vaccine, gene therapy, and blood product regulation, while providing senior input on medical policy and regulatory decisions. Today he published a letter to his team at the FDA examining the risks & benefits of the COVID shots. This letter is worth a slow careful read because, among other things, it explains why and how we should to do (and not do) public health in the future. If we take Prasad's analysis to heart, maybe "at least 10 children" did not die in vain. Here's is Prasad's letter:

Dear Team CBER,

I am writing to report that OBPV (The Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance) career staff have found that at least 10 children have died after and because of receiving COVID-19 vaccination. These deaths are related to vaccination (likely/probable/possible attribution made by staff). That number is certainly an underestimate due to underreporting, and inherent bias in attribution. This safety signal has far reaching implications for Americans, the US pandemic response, and the agency itself, which I wish to discuss here. I also want to address some frequent objections.

Prior to joining the US FDA, the FDA Commissioner closely followed reports of vaccine-induced myocarditis. Unlike the COVID virus, which has a steep age gradient-- being at least 1000 times more likely to kill an 80 year old than an 8 year old-- myocarditis appeared to have the opposite pattern. Young, healthy boys and men-- those least likely to experience bad covid outcomes-- bore the greatest risk. The risk was as high as ~200-330 per million doses given in the highest risk demographic groups. Notably, the US FDA and CDC were not the first to recognize the safety signal-- instead the Israelis were-- and worse in May of 2021, then CDC director Rochelle Walensky stated, “We have not seen a signal and we’ve actually looked intentionally for the signal in the over 200 million doses we’ve given,” Many felt this statement was dishonest and manipulative.

The Commissioner, senior advisor Tracy Beth Hoeg MD PhD, myself and colleagues demonstrated that COVID-19 boosters, and the accompanying mandates by colleges, were on balance harmful to young men in a widely discussed, peer reviewed paper in 2022. Like many academic physicians, we felt the FDA and CDC abdicated their duty to the American people. These agencies did not quickly attempt mitigation strategies such as spacing doses apart, lowering doses, omitting doses among those with prior COVID-19.

Worse, the FDA delayed acknowledgement of the safety signal until after it could extend marketing authorization to younger boys 12-15. This is described by the Commissioner and I in JAMA. Had the acknowledgement come early, these younger boys, who likely did not require COVID-19 vaccination, may have chosen to avoid the products.

In the summer of 2025, Dr. Hoeg began investigating VAERS reports of children who had died after administration of the COVID-19 vaccine. By late summer, she had concluded that there were in fact deaths-- a fact this agency had never publicly admitted.

Dr. Hoeg organized a small meeting to discuss these deaths with (Office of Vaccines Research and Review) OVRR and OBPV stakeholders. The slides she presented, emails she sent, and distorted firsthand reports was shared with media outlets. The general narrative was that OVRR staff disagreed with Dr. Hoeg’s assessment that the deaths were due to vaccine receipt. Some staff present who leaked portrayed the incident as Dr. Hoeg attempting to create a false fear regarding vaccines.

I then asked OBPV to perform a detailed analysis of deaths voluntarily reported to the VAERS system-- in full interest of balance. Causality is easy to assess in a randomized trial, but with case reports, causality is typically assessed on a subjective scale. In this scale ranging from certain to unlikely-- certain, possible/likely, and probable are broadly considered as related to the product.

The team has performed an initial analysis of 96 deaths between 2021 and 2024, and concludes that no fewer than 10 are related. If anything, this represents conservative coding, where vaccines are exculpated rather than indicted in cases of ambiguity. The real number is higher.

This is a profound revelation. For the first time, the US FDA will acknowledge that COVID-19 vaccines have killed American children. Healthy young children who faced tremendously low risk of death were coerced, at the behest of the Biden administration, via school and work mandates, to receive a vaccine that could result in death. In many cases, such mandates were harmful. It is difficult to read cases where kids aged 7 to 16 may be dead as a result of covid vaccines.

Did COVID-19 vaccine programs kill more healthy kids than it saved? We do not have reliable data estimating the absolute benefit (absolute risk reduction) regarding severe disease and death in healthy children from vaccine receipt. OVRR and OBPV rely on observation cohort or case control data with notorious methodologic biases. FDA has never requested the manufacturers demonstrate in randomized fashion that vaccinating children improves these outcomes. The available randomized data in children is deeply limited, and broadly negative for symptomatic infection, as discussed in prior ad-coms. Furthermore, COVID-19 was never highly lethal for children, and now MIS-c has decreased drastically, and the harms, to kids, are comparable to many respiratory viruses for which we do not provide annual immunization.

Comparing the number of kids who died from COVID against these deaths would be a flawed comparison. We do not know how many fewer kids would have died had they been vaccinated, and we do not know how many more kids died from taking vaccines than has been voluntarily reported. Instead, the truth is we do not know if we saved lives on balance.

When it comes to vaccine deaths, VAERS is passively reported. It requires a motivated person, often a doctor, to submit the information. The submission process is tedious and most people who start the form give up along the way. Many more deaths may be unreported. Finally, the FDA has failed to properly enforce many required post market commitments for COVID-19 vaccines, including for pregnant women and to document subclinical myocarditis.

Putting these facts together, it is horrifying to consider that the US vaccine regulation, including our actions, may have harmed more children than we saved. This requires humility and introspection. [More . . . ]

Continue ReadingVinay Prasad Reviews the Risks and Benefits of the COVID Shots