“Safe and Effective”? New Documentary, “An Inconvenient Study” Proves Harm and Lack of Informed Consent re Vaccinations

Del Bigtree (Min 15):  "What did we prove in [our] lawsits [against HHS, FDA and NIH]?  That the entire science behind vaccine safety was nothing but a complete fraud."

Five years ago, I would have thought anyone saying this was insane. I've had dozens of vaccines over my life and my wife and I made sure that our daughters were constantly up-to-date on the vaccines with the pediatrician. Now, after following independent media and congressional hearings, reading Aaron Siri's "Vaccines, Amen! (and see here) and watching the documentary, "An Inconvenient Study,"   I am convinced that Del Bigtree is making a highly credible claim.

Scientists can be corrupted by money and prestige, just like politicians, government officials, CEOs and any other human beings. I highly recommend that you completely ignore what corporate media currently peddles. Instead check out the above sources and make up your own mind.

If you are still skeptical, consider this: "David and Brenda McDowell got their triplets vaccinated with the pneumococcal shot, only for all three children to “shut off on the SAME DAY.”

If you think that you are well informed because you rely on official sources, consider the following an article published by "The Forgotten Side of Medicine." The title to the article: "Dissecting the Religion of Vaccines: How vaccines became the holy water of Western civilization."

Due to the high toxicity of vaccines, real studies inevitably show significant injury. The medical community’s strategy hence has been to block studies comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated from ever being produced.

As such, placebo-controlled vaccine trials are vehemently rejected as “unethical” because they deny (placebo) children a “life-saving” vaccine—despite it being far more unethical to inject every child with vaccines of unknown safety (or benefit). Yet when “ethical” studies show vaccine injuries are real, they’re rejected as “non-controlled” and met with demands for “controlled trials” (that are banned for “ethical” reasons). This absurdity continues as:

When “non-controlled” datasets indicate safety, rather than be questioned, they are widely publicized.

Large datasets that could “ethically” compare vaccinated to unvaccinated exist, but the public is never given access despite extensive efforts to obtain them (and most recently, the CDC deleted theirs so Secretary Kennedy could not get it).

When individuals independently conduct such studies demonstrating harm, studies get retracted and investigators are often targeted by medical boards.

Most recently, a physician agreed to conduct a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study to prove vaccines were safe and then publish the results regardless of what they showed. Once its data irrefutably showed vaccines were immensely dangerous, he refused to publish the study and apologetically admitted to a hidden camera he did that to protect himself.

Many other incriminating datasets are routinely buried. For example, a CDC whistleblower testified that the CDC buried data they collected showing vaccines cause autism, and when a court order finally forced the CDC to release their data used to track COVID-19 vaccine safety, it showed significant harm and that past publications of this data had hid that harm. Likewise, Senator Johnson, through chairing the Senate’s investigative committee, was able to obtain concrete proof the CDC had internal data of serious complications from the vaccine (e.g., myocarditis) but then suppressed this knowledge from reaching the public.

In short, an illogical status quo has been enshrined where “the absence of evidence” for vaccine harm is erroneously accepted as “the evidence of absence.”

This article further asserts that the vaccine industry has imposed upon us what amounts to a religion. Strong sounding stuff, right? Consider:

Story at a Glance:

•As more people awaken to the dangers of vaccines, they discover a persistent problem vaccine safety advocates have faced for decades: talking to vaccine zealots is like speaking to a brick wall.

•Regardless of the evidence presented, you cannot reach them—sometimes it feels like speaking to religious fanatics unwilling to consider the “blasphemy you’re spewing forth.”

•This is deliberate, as vaccines have been enshrined as the holy water which baptizes you into the faith of Western medicine and became the “miracle” the superiority of modern medicine is based upon.

•Because of this faith and the relentless propaganda accompanying it, a series of absurd and contradictory arguments have been established to assert vaccines are “safe” which would never be accepted anywhere else.

•As a result, all vaccine research is designed around the assumption vaccines must be safe, and all regulatory decisions sharing this bias—thereby making it nearly impossible to prove a vaccine is harmful, regardless of how many people it kills or injures.

•This article will review the absurd fallacies used to defend mass vaccination, the unsound mindsets that produce them, and the incredible opportunity we have to at last shift this dysfunctional dynamic.

Keep in mind the pathetically thin testing of vaccines that the industry insists that we inject into our children:

Until recent changes urged by Robert F. Kennedy, this was the vaccine schedule for children (on the right):

The corporate media is an accomplice to the lack of accurate information available to the American public. Consider this:

Did you know the news used to regularly air stories about people's lives being ruined by vaccines?

That all changed after Clinton let Pharma buy out the media.

Here I compiled 56 mind-blowing news segments they'd never air today.

Continue Reading“Safe and Effective”? New Documentary, “An Inconvenient Study” Proves Harm and Lack of Informed Consent re Vaccinations

What America Needs for Better Health

First, the problem. Robert Malone, MD explains:

The MAHA agenda as defined in these two key planning documents identifies four potential drivers behind the rise in childhood chronic disease that present the clearest opportunities for progress:

Poor Diet: The American diet has shifted dramatically toward highly processed foods, leading to nutrient depletion, increased caloric intake, and exposure to potentially harmful or unhealthy additives. Over 60% of children’s calories now come from highly processed foods, contributing to obesity, diabetes, and other chronic conditions.

Chemical Exposure: Children are exposed to an increasing number of synthetic chemicals, some of which have been linked to developmental issues and chronic disease. The current regulatory framework should be continually evaluated to ensure that chemicals and other exposures do not interact together to pose a threat to the health of our children.

Lack of Physical Activity and Chronic Stress: American children are experiencing unprecedented levels of inactivity, screen use, sleep deprivation, and chronic stress. These factors significantly contribute to the rise in chronic diseases and mental health challenges.

Overmedicalization: There is a concerning trend of overprescribing medications to children, often driven by conflicts of interest in medical research, regulation, and practice. This has led to unnecessary treatments and long-term health risks.

All indicators show that America’s health is failing, and the American people know we all need a dramatically new approach to healthcare in this country.

Now, Congress is required to do heavy lifting. To summarize:

They are grouped into five categories: 1) Food, nutrition, and consumer protection reforms, 2) Public health, medical, and regulatory systems reforms, 3) Agricultural, environmental, and process deregulation, 4) Agency restructuring and governance reforms, and 5) Oversight and systemic transparency reforms.

Malone has written a long comprehensive list of needed changes, with relevant links. Highly recommended.

Continue ReadingWhat America Needs for Better Health

Aaron Siri Introduces his New Book, Vaccines, Amen.

New post on X by Aaron Siri:

An excerpt from the intro to Vaccines, Amen:

Ever hear someone say, “I believe in cars” or “I believe in tools”? I cannot recall ever hearing anyone say they believe in a certain product. But I hear people say, “I believe in vaccines” all the time, especially in response to evidence regarding vaccines.

The expression “I believe in vaccines” carries a truism. The properties often attributed to vaccines require faith. Belief. This is because most claims about vaccines are not grounded in evidence. They are beliefs. It is why challenging claims about vaccines—meaning challenging beliefs—often results in an emotional, not logical, reaction.

This is also why wading into this topic is not for the faint of heart. Nor is it for anyone seeking to avoid controversy. Just the word “vaccines” evokes emotions for many.

Falling Into Vaccine Law

For this reason, among many others, I likely would have laughed if someone had told me eighteen years ago that I would be managing a law firm, with over 100 professionals, working on vaccine injury, exemptions, and policy. Back then, I was working on high-stakes, multi-billion-dollar lawsuits at one of the country’s premier law firms. Even after starting my own law firm over a decade ago, I continued to handle mostly high-stakes business litigation matters.

Then, one fateful day, I learned something I could not unlearn: of all the corporations I was defending, I would likely never have to defend a pharmaceutical company against claims that children were seriously injured or killed by a vaccine. Why? Because in 1986, Congress granted these companies financial immunity for injuries caused by childhood vaccines in a law titled the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (the 1986 Act).

I learned that, because of the 1986 Act, parents of seriously injured or deceased children must sue the federal government’s health department, instead of the company that profited from the product that harmed their children. From that one data point, my journey regarding vaccines began. What I have uncovered along the way has frequently been unbelievable.

This journey, spanning over a decade of litigating vaccine lawsuits of all stripes across the country, has been unique. This is partly because, unlike doctors, who can appeal to their credentials, I do not get to just say, “trust me.” I need to prove claims I assert with real data. Real proof. Something that will hold up in court. Non-authoritative science will not do. Unreliable data will not do. This means my vaccine litigation work requires me to study the primary sources and carefully review and scrutinize the studies and data that support each claim. v In the course of that legal work, I have worked with well over a hundred immunologists, infectious disease doctors, pediatricians, and other medical professionals. I have deposed these specialists as well, including the world’s leading vaccinologists. This work requires an understanding of vaccinology, immunology, infectious disease, and pediatrics, among other disciplines, with regard to these products. Want to talk about any other drug, medical procedure, etc.? I am not your man. But vaccines, those I know.

Incredibly, most of the information needed to understand vaccine safety is freely available on federal government websites and public databases. Most doctors and parents never bother to look or don’t know it exists. Those who do know and look often learn things they cannot unlearn.

Continue ReadingAaron Siri Introduces his New Book, Vaccines, Amen.

About Disturbing COVID Numbers

About half of Americans hear these numbers and we are concerned. We want vigorous transparent independent investigations and we don't trust Big Pharma or the corrupt CDC and FDA from years past based on thousands of deaths caused by Pharma over the years (e.g., OxyContin, Fentanyl, Vioxx). The other half of Americans, many of whom used to be the type of Democrats who sharply criticized Big Pharma (and censorship and war), have recently first-hand seen the demise of a dozen major COVID lies by Pharma and their own government. They nevertheless seek to censor those who point out disturbing data regarding vaccines.

The fact that their own government has lied to them over and over for decades does not concern them. They bury themselves in their corporate news (heavily financed by Pharma), thus making them ever-more captured by propaganda. They are afraid to ask themselves whether ANY of their current positions clash with the official positions of the DNC. They are afraid that their friends will dislike them if they think for themselves. Naomi Wolf was once highly-regarded by Democrats. But look what happens when you go counter-corporate narrative! MOST of my favorite writers and journalist were, in recent years, Democrats who have now been kicked out of the tribe because they dared to raise obvious concerns. So many Americans have cut a deal with the devil. They would rather be liked by their tribe than know what is actually going on.

Highly appropriate laugh track inserted:

Continue ReadingAbout Disturbing COVID Numbers