Del Bigtree (Min 15): "What did we prove in [our] lawsits [against HHS, FDA and NIH]? That the entire science behind vaccine safety was nothing but a complete fraud."
Five years ago, I would have thought anyone saying this was insane. I've had dozens of vaccines over my life and my wife and I made sure that our daughters were constantly up-to-date on the vaccines with the pediatrician. Now, after following independent media and congressional hearings, reading Aaron Siri's "Vaccines, Amen! (and see here) and watching the documentary, "An Inconvenient Study," I am convinced that Del Bigtree is making a highly credible claim.
Scientists can be corrupted by money and prestige, just like politicians, government officials, CEOs and any other human beings. I highly recommend that you completely ignore what corporate media currently peddles. Instead check out the above sources and make up your own mind.
If you are still skeptical, consider this: "David and Brenda McDowell got their triplets vaccinated with the pneumococcal shot, only for all three children to “shut off on the SAME DAY.”
If you think that you are well informed because you rely on official sources, consider the following an article published by "The Forgotten Side of Medicine." The title to the article: "Dissecting the Religion of Vaccines: How vaccines became the holy water of Western civilization."
Due to the high toxicity of vaccines, real studies inevitably show significant injury. The medical community’s strategy hence has been to block studies comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated from ever being produced.
As such, placebo-controlled vaccine trials are vehemently rejected as “unethical” because they deny (placebo) children a “life-saving” vaccine—despite it being far more unethical to inject every child with vaccines of unknown safety (or benefit). Yet when “ethical” studies show vaccine injuries are real, they’re rejected as “non-controlled” and met with demands for “controlled trials” (that are banned for “ethical” reasons). This absurdity continues as:
When “non-controlled” datasets indicate safety, rather than be questioned, they are widely publicized.
Large datasets that could “ethically” compare vaccinated to unvaccinated exist, but the public is never given access despite extensive efforts to obtain them (and most recently, the CDC deleted theirs so Secretary Kennedy could not get it).
When individuals independently conduct such studies demonstrating harm, studies get retracted and investigators are often targeted by medical boards.
Most recently, a physician agreed to conduct a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study to prove vaccines were safe and then publish the results regardless of what they showed. Once its data irrefutably showed vaccines were immensely dangerous, he refused to publish the study and apologetically admitted to a hidden camera he did that to protect himself.
Many other incriminating datasets are routinely buried. For example, a CDC whistleblower testified that the CDC buried data they collected showing vaccines cause autism, and when a court order finally forced the CDC to release their data used to track COVID-19 vaccine safety, it showed significant harm and that past publications of this data had hid that harm. Likewise, Senator Johnson, through chairing the Senate’s investigative committee, was able to obtain concrete proof the CDC had internal data of serious complications from the vaccine (e.g., myocarditis) but then suppressed this knowledge from reaching the public.
In short, an illogical status quo has been enshrined where “the absence of evidence” for vaccine harm is erroneously accepted as “the evidence of absence.”
This article further asserts that the vaccine industry has imposed upon us what amounts to a religion. Strong sounding stuff, right? Consider:
Story at a Glance:
•As more people awaken to the dangers of vaccines, they discover a persistent problem vaccine safety advocates have faced for decades: talking to vaccine zealots is like speaking to a brick wall.
•Regardless of the evidence presented, you cannot reach them—sometimes it feels like speaking to religious fanatics unwilling to consider the “blasphemy you’re spewing forth.”
•This is deliberate, as vaccines have been enshrined as the holy water which baptizes you into the faith of Western medicine and became the “miracle” the superiority of modern medicine is based upon.
•Because of this faith and the relentless propaganda accompanying it, a series of absurd and contradictory arguments have been established to assert vaccines are “safe” which would never be accepted anywhere else.
•As a result, all vaccine research is designed around the assumption vaccines must be safe, and all regulatory decisions sharing this bias—thereby making it nearly impossible to prove a vaccine is harmful, regardless of how many people it kills or injures.
•This article will review the absurd fallacies used to defend mass vaccination, the unsound mindsets that produce them, and the incredible opportunity we have to at last shift this dysfunctional dynamic.
Keep in mind the pathetically thin testing of vaccines that the industry insists that we inject into our children:
Until recent changes urged by Robert F. Kennedy, this was the vaccine schedule for children (on the right):
The corporate media is an accomplice to the lack of accurate information available to the American public. Consider this:
Did you know the news used to regularly air stories about people's lives being ruined by vaccines?
That all changed after Clinton let Pharma buy out the media.
Here I compiled 56 mind-blowing news segments they'd never air today.
