Experiencing the paradox of choice at the local Schnucks grocery store.

It's difficult to overcome the prejudice that having more choices is always better.   In The Paradox of Choice, Barry Schwartz made a convincing case that too much choice can overload and paralyze us.   I couldn't help but think of the paradox of choice while grocery shopping yesterday.   One of the…

Continue ReadingExperiencing the paradox of choice at the local Schnucks grocery store.

Susan Jacoby argues that America has entered the “age of unreason.”

In this interview on Bill Moyers' Feb 15, 2008 show (see the video here), author Susan Jacoby argues that we are now struggling with ignorance as a political crisis. She argues that we are obsessed with small personal facts at the expense of important issues. Most Americans don't spend the necessary time to have a legitimate base of knowledge from which to make important decisions. Yet politicians dare not address this crisis of ignorance. They won't talk about the political significance of public ignorance, even though it is the widespread public ignorance of basic facts that "makes serious deception possible and plausible." Jacoby offers quite a few anecdotes. One of these anecdotes is about Franklin Delano Roosevelt's radio addresses during World War II. Roosevelt urged his listeners to go get a map and to look at the map while he talked about the significant events of that war. It's hard to imagine any political figure doing that today. Jacoby cites statistics indicating that only a small number of today's high school graduates have any idea of where the various countries of the Middle East are located on a world map on which the country boundaries are drawn. She takes it as a truism that our political culture is a reflection of our general culture. We don't want to learn anymore. We go to websites and we attend lectures only when we want to hear information that reinforces what we are ready know. Only a small minority of people are any longer willing to learn from people with whom they disagree. Jacoby blames this on the reduced attention span of Americans.It also has to do with the number of Americans who exercise critical thinking. One-half of Americans believe in ghosts. One-third of Americans believe in astrology. One-half of Americans do not believe in evolution. Jacoby party blames the media. The news media presents "truth as equidistant from two points." For example, evolution and creationism are presented as two equally valid viewpoints by the news media. Jacoby calls this tactic "dumb objectivity."She cites a shocking statistic (put forth by Stephen Prothero in a book called Religious Literacy): one-half of Americans cannot name Genesis as the first book of the Bible. This lack of information is shocking because huge numbers of Americans claim that the Bible is the most important book in the world. Here's more shocking statistics: 15% of Americans do not understand that the Earth revolves around the sun. Most Americans don't know how many Justices are on the United States Supreme Court. The ignorance goes on and on, and it is imperiling our democracy. It makes you wonder what we are spending our time doing. Here's a hint: you can find multiple magazine racks like this at most supermarkets. grocery-store-magazine-at-checkout-aisle-lo-res.jpg (Photo by Erich Vieth. Click to enlarge image).

Continue ReadingSusan Jacoby argues that America has entered the “age of unreason.”

In “Irreligion,” mathematician John Paulos explains why arguments for God just don’t add up

John Paulos, well-known for his writings on mathematics (he is a professor of mathematics at Temple University), has now published a book on the topic of God. In Irreligion he asks whether there are any logical or mathematically substantiated reasons to believe in God. He concludes that the answer is a resounding no.

Irreligion is a short book (only 150 pages) and it is written cleanly, with lots of humor stirred in.

Paulos gets off to a good start when he insists that you can’t really argue whether God exists unless you define what you mean by “God.” He recognizes, for example, that some people use the term God to refer to the laws of physics or nature itself. This book, however, is addressed to those who believe in a more traditional version of God:

Most conventional monotheistic characterizations of God (Yahweh, Allah) take Him to be an entity or Being that is, if not omnipotent, at least extraordinarily powerful; if not omniscient, at least surpassingly wise; if not the Creator of the universe, at least intimately connected with its origin; if not completely and absolutely perfect, at least possessor of all manner of positive characteristics. This formulation will, on the whole, be my definition of God and the many flawed arguments for this entity’s existence will be my primary focus.

By this definition, an atheist is “someone who believes that such an entity does not exist.” An agnostic is “someone who believes that whether God exists or not …

Share

Continue ReadingIn “Irreligion,” mathematician John Paulos explains why arguments for God just don’t add up

Congress: It’s OK for phone companies to spy on their customers

This bit of depressing news was reported by The Crypt:  An attempt to strip lawsuit immunity for telecom firms which helped the government tap phone calls fell well short in the Senate, leaving liberal Democrats on the losing side of what they believe is a fundamental civil liberties debate. Only…

Continue ReadingCongress: It’s OK for phone companies to spy on their customers