Framing the abortion debate (part 1): What is the missing premise?

A logical argument, known as a syllogism, looks like this:      PREMISE 1:  All dogs have wet noses.      PREMISE 2:  Max is a dog.      CONCLUSION:  Max has a wet nose. Easy, right?  Now, let's see what happens when we remove one of the premises:      PREMISE 1:  All…

Continue ReadingFraming the abortion debate (part 1): What is the missing premise?

The shake-up that wasn’t

The Whitehouse yesterday announced the "resignation" of press secretary Scott McClellan and the reassignment of political advisor Karl Rove, and the news today has been obligingly calling it a "shake-up."  This writer sees things differently.  First, whether or not McClellan left voluntarily (the reports are conflicting), what better way for the Whitehouse to…

Continue ReadingThe shake-up that wasn’t

Would a deadline for troop withdrawal create fewer American dead?

One of the Sunday morning pundits today (4/16/06) made an excellent point.  He observed that President Bush has refused to give a firm date for withdrawing US troops from Iraq, because, Bush says, such an action would embolden the terrorists to just wait us out.  However, Bush then ignored this principle…

Continue ReadingWould a deadline for troop withdrawal create fewer American dead?

Darwin’s “theory of evolution” isn’t evolution; it’s natural selection

I can always tell when an opponent of Darwin's "theory of evolution" has never read Darwin, because they try to claim that Darwin's "theory of evolution" means that "evolution is a theory." Unfortunately for them, the phrase "Darwin's theory of evolution" does not mean evolution was Darwin's theory.  Scientists recognized evolution long…

Continue ReadingDarwin’s “theory of evolution” isn’t evolution; it’s natural selection