One of the main causes of America’s Revolutionary War against Britain was the fact that British Parliament was passing tax laws against the Colonies, but was also denying the Colonists the right to be represented in Parliament to protest those taxes. “No taxation without representation” was the rallying cry that swept through the New world and solidified opposition to Britain’s dictatorial rule.
This rallying cry came thundering back into my head this week as I was reading the Bible — specifically, Daniel, chapter 9. Nearly the entire chapter is devoted to Daniel begging for God’s forgiveness, because of Israel’s failure to obey God’s laws. I suddenly realized that of the 600+ laws that God handed down to the Isrealites (the Ten Commandments were only a brief summary), *not one* was enacted with the consent, or even the counsel, of the Israelites. As I read through the chapter, I suddenly realized how absurd Daniel’s begging sounded. God did not give Daniel, or any other Israelite, any role whatsoever in making the laws that God handed down, so why should the Israelites take the entire blame for not following them? Just as the American Colonists did in the Revolutionary War, shouldn’t Daniel have objected to dictatorial law-making as fundamentally unfair, instead of begging forgiveness for not adhering to it?
Let me anticipate the Christian objection: unlike British Parliament, God is righteous and perfectly fair; therefore, his laws are, too. Really? If God is so perfect and fair, then why didn’t his elaborate …