The Two Starkly Different Meanings of “Black Lives Matter,” and Political Ideas That Must Never Be Criticized

"Black Lives Matter" is a simple looking phrase, but it functions as a Trojan Horse. Many people don't understand that there is a big difference between A) stating the obvious fact that Black lives do, indeed, matter and B) embracing the controversial political agenda of the Black Lives Matter organizations. Just because one believes A doesn't necessarily mean that one believes B, but this conflation flies under the radars of many people who embrace both A and B even though the only part that they have carefully considered is A.

Consider this excerpt from a recent news article about Nick Buckley, a man who has spent many years of his life helping desperate others through a charity he founded in 2011, Mancunian Way, based in Manchester, England. The problem started when Nick dared to write an article:

In the article the 52-year-old started by saying: “Of course black lives matter. Let’s get this obvious point over and done with at the beginning”, but went on to criticise the political agenda of the organisation BLM which sought to repudiate the values expressed by Martin Luther King.

I am sympathetic to Nick Buckley's clearly stated concerns. Like Buckley, I am concerned that some of the political ends of BLM sharply conflict with the wisdom of Martin Luther King. The fact that Nick Buckley dared to speak up about this critical issue cost him his job and that is a tragedy.

In some circles, the phrase "Black Lives Matter" has taken on the status of an unassailable fundamentalist religion, which is extremely unfortunate. Whenever this phrase is uttered, we should be asking whether the speaker is asserting A, B or both A and B.  Whereas A is self-evident truth to me, B is a complex set of ideas, many of them ill-defined and/or problematic.

Every idea, especially every political idea, should be open to vigorous criticism and discussion. There should be no exceptions, for the reasons carefully stated by John Stuart Mill in his work, On Liberty. To every claim I respond: "Let's test it." To the extent that any ideas are declared to be sacrosanct, off-limits to discussion and criticism based on science, statistical analyses and the diverse wisdom collected by thinking people from the beginning of time, our democracies are dead.

Continue ReadingThe Two Starkly Different Meanings of “Black Lives Matter,” and Political Ideas That Must Never Be Criticized

About Mary Wollstonecraft

Today I first learned about proto-feminist Mary Wollstonecraft. I can barely fathom how any person could muster the courage to take such a strong moral stand in 1792. You don't need much imagination to understand the abuse she took as a result of writing her book. History is filled with many such "insane" ideas that eventually become common sense. From Wikipedia:

A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: with Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects (1792), written by the 18th-century British proto-feminist Mary Wollstonecraft, is one of the earliest works of feminist philosophy. In it, Wollstonecraft responds to those educational and political theorists of the 18th century who believed that women should not receive a rational education. . . . Wollstonecraft maintains that women are human beings deserving of the same fundamental rights as men, and that treating them as mere ornaments or property for men undermines the moral foundations of society. . . . She launched a broad attack against sexual double standards, indicting men for encouraging women to indulge in excessive emotion. Wollstonecraft hurried to complete the work in direct response to ongoing events; she intended to write a more thoughtful second volume but died before completing it.

Continue ReadingAbout Mary Wollstonecraft

It Was Easy to Backup My PC Computer With Acronis 2018. It Was Much More Difficult to Restore From a Backup

It's been a frustrating week for my law firm's IT Department (I am my own IT department).  My generic desktop PC's ability to use Wifi stopped working. I tried various repairs, but after nothing worked, I decided to restore my computer a few days back with a backup program called Acronis 2018.  I had been diligently making backups for the past couple years with this program, but I was living in blissful ignorance. This week, I attempted a full metal-to-metal restore twice but it twice failed.  I was also confused by the entire Acronis process. It wasn't entirely clear to me how to make the boot disk or whether a boot disk was necessary.  For my third try, I contacted Acronis support.  No live people were available on a voice line unless you were willing to pay an additional $20.  A support person on a chat line had seen my several previous emails to Acronis discussing my concerns and questions, as well as my failures.

This person on the chat line walked me through the restore, step by step.  This took an hour.  After the restore was underway, he assured me that when it was finished, my computer would look exactly like it did when I last backed it up.  When the restore was complete, however, my PC screen read:  "RESTORE FAILED."   The Acronis people responded again when I reported this failure by email, but they were asking me to refer to computer logs when my computer would display one and only one screen: "RESTORE FAILED." No thanks. I had given up on Acronis, especially after spending 8 hours trying to get these restores to work. 

Luckily, Dropbox and Onedrive were working like champs, so most of my data was safe. But this episode was a big frustration for me.  My work around was to purchase an iMac. I appreciate Apple's Time Machine more than ever.  Easy to use and bulletproof.  And here are my words of warning.  If you buy a new backup program, find some way to test it before relying on it.  I don't know whether there actually a way to do a test restore.  I personally wouldn't want to mess with my PC like this. It takes too much damned work and if it fails, you'll be up shit creek without paddle.  I have used Time Machine on other Macs over the years, and it has been bulletproof.  Apple's Time machine is one of the most impressive apps out there.  That's where my money is now. 

Continue ReadingIt Was Easy to Backup My PC Computer With Acronis 2018. It Was Much More Difficult to Restore From a Backup

Dr. Diana Fleischman Discusses Sex Differences Between Men and Women

You are invited to join this lively discussion with Dr. Diana Fleischman. The topic: significant biological and psychological sex differences between men and women.

One of the most stunning differences discussed in this video was described in Attraction Explained: The science of how we form relationships, By Viren Swami:

In classic studies conducted by Russell Clark and Elaine Hatfield between 1978 and 2003, college students were approached by a fairly attractive member of the opposite sex, who was really a confederate of the researchers. This confederate would hang around campus and, once a target had been selected, she or he would walk up to the target and say, ‘I have been noticing you around campus. I find you to be very attractive’. Next, the confederate would ask one of three questions: (l) Will you go on a date with me? (2) Will you come back to my apartment? or (3) Will you have sex with me?

For the first question, there was no clear sex difference - across studies, 56 per cent of women and 50 per cent of men accepted the date. But for the other questions, which could be interpreted as questions about casual sex, there were clearer sex differences. For the question about going back to the confederate’s apartment, 69 per cent of men consented compared to only 6 per cent of women. And for the final, 75 per cent of men agreed to sex, while not a single woman said yes to sex. In fact, every time the study was repeated, not a single woman agreed to sex at any time. In a more recent study, fairly attractive psychology students approached a member of the opposite sex in public places in four cities in Denmark and asked: (l) Would you go on a date with men tonight or during the week/weekend? (2) Would you come over to my place tonight or during the week/weekend? or (3) Would you go to bed with me tonight or during the week/weekend? When individuals in relationships were excluded from the count, 68 per cent of men and 43 per cent of women agreed to a date, 40 per cent of men and 21 per cent of women agreed to go to the student’s place, and 59 per cent of men but none of the women agreed to casual sex.

There are many other differences between the sexes discussed by Dr. Fleishman. It's important to add some context to these sex difference studies, however.  Yes, there are differences, and many of these seem dramatic, but men and women are not from different planets.  They are extremely similar in many ways.  How many?  Hundreds of ways, as documented by Donald E. Brown.  All of us are mostly the same. 

Continue ReadingDr. Diana Fleischman Discusses Sex Differences Between Men and Women