New Rule: Don’t Talk about Abigail Shrier’s Well-Researched Book on Gender Transitioning Among Teenaged Girls

Shrier tweet

I am saddened and angered, but not surprised, by this systematic censorship of Abigail Shrier’s well-researched book. Many of the most dangerous things being done by our news media Nannies consist of things you cannot see: important issues they completely refuse to discuss. You can read my original post on this topic here.

I’ve pasted in evidence of Abigail Shrier’s claim below. The people driving the censorship know that if this issue is carefully and dispassionately discussed (as Shrier has done in her book), the jig is up. Untold damage is being done to teenage girls. We need to stop and ask ourselves (as Shrier book does) “What the hell are we doing?”

See the Tweets below for some of the evidence:

amazon

Kirkus

Science Writers

Share

Erich Vieth

Erich Vieth is an attorney focusing on civil rights (including First Amendment), consumer law litigation and appellate practice. At this website often writes about censorship, corporate news media corruption and cognitive science. He is also a working musician, artist and a writer, having founded Dangerous Intersection in 2006. Erich lives in St. Louis, Missouri with his two daughters.

This Post Has 3 Comments

  1. Avatar of A
    A

    Presumably you’re scientifically literate but seeing as you consider this book to be well researched I’m forced to question that. Perhaps you should consider reading some of the actual studies it pulls from. And perhaps also consider why you’re so ready to believe that a small, vulnerable, and largely financially disadvantaged group of people have some sort of extreme control over the entire field of psychology. To the extent where they’ve managed to convince the majority of people in it to ignore this supposedly substantial amount of evidence indicating that rapid onset gender dysphoria is a real and pressing issue.

    1. Avatar of Erich Vieth
      Erich Vieth

      A) Feelings trump evidence.
      B) Ad hominem attacks/name calling.
      C) If you’d really like to talk about any specific claim Abigail Shrier made in her book, you are welcome to do so, but please first give us some indication that you actually read her book before commenting further.

Leave a Reply