“Just Because I’m Paranoid Doesn’t Mean They’re Not Out to Get Me!”
OK, so sometimes I do go off the deep blue end but, I really think that very nearly all of our communications are monitored without warrant or our knowing consent. “So what?” you say, “If you’re not doing anything wrong what do you have to worry about?”
If a US citizen cannot have their most private information free from others, we have no civil society but a state where any innocent series of calls or conversations could be made to look as though some wrongdoing were afoot. I’m an attorney and I have to be sure my communications are kept both secret and confidential. If others know what we’re up to in a given case, it sorta takes the wind out of sails and stacks the deck against us. How would they know? Easy!
Old analog cell phones, some digital cells and the phones you can walk around with that have a base at work or home and talk can be listened to with a police scanner and the courts have ruled that since the signal is readily available to monitoring there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in your conversations and a warrant isn’t needed to listen or record the calls.
The major phone companies just gave up all your calling data to the National Security Agency (NSA) , except Qwest, when the government simply asked for it. The telcos then went to Congress and got themselves a ban on any consumer lawsuits for illegally releasing your private, confidential calling information.
We also all heard about the National Security Agency’s (NSA) illegal interception of US citizens’ communications under the Bush administration. Many of the Bush secret “anti-terror” policies have been continued by the Obama administration.
Faxes and e-mails from offices should now have a warning notice to recipients that the sender cannot guarantee that some government agency is not intercepting the communication without their knowledge or consent or a search warrant. And see here.
It’s so bad that some citizens, like reporters, use so-called “burner phones” for calls to confidential sources and toss them after one or very few uses so as to not have their locations or sources compromised. Of course, then the reporters or whoever are now acting “suspiciously” and may have their innocent conduct of just wanting privacy used to have some eager beaver go get a roving wiretap on the person under the so-called USA Patriot Act.
The US House and Senate just passed a “Defense Authorization Act” for President Obama to sign which includes another “authorization for the use of force” against suspected al Qaeda terrorists and allows for the possible indefinites detention of US citizens without charge, denies such US citizen “suspects” access to US civilian courts, and denies them access to counsel, all of which have never been allowed before in US history. President Obama must veto the bill.
I don’t think it reasonable that we have to have any fear that all our communications are monitored by some government agency.
So much has been justified in the “war on terror” that maybe I’m not so paranoid after all.
Look at:
http://dangerousintersection.org/2007/07/14/terror-in-the-burbs/
You know, Tim, I wonder if I’d rather have you go back to your anti-Republican rants because when you get serious, you pull out some scary stuff.
Nice article.
And so it goes…
The Obama administration is engaging in extensive warrantless interception of private citizens’ communications to an extent more aggressive and outside of the rubric of “anti-terrorism.”
Forgoshsakes, Obama is worse than W!
http://act.demandprogress.org/sign/holder_patriot_act/?akid=1298.1531213.ycv-Ip&rd=1&t=2
The above link urges support for a couple of courageous opponents of the Obama folks irrational and illegal conduct…oops, dammit, now I’m a higher priority on their List!