Court rules that politicians may not seize citizens’ cameras at town hall meetings

PoliticusUSA has the report:

According to a recent Federal Appeals court ruling, Republican members of Congress who confiscate citizens’ cell phones or cameras and do not allow filming at town halls are violating their constituents First Amendment rights.

Share

Erich Vieth

Erich Vieth is an attorney focusing on civil rights (including First Amendment), consumer law litigation and appellate practice. At this website often writes about censorship, corporate news media corruption and cognitive science. He is also a working musician, artist and a writer, having founded Dangerous Intersection in 2006. Erich lives in St. Louis, Missouri with his two daughters.

This Post Has 4 Comments

  1. Avatar of Edgar Montrose
    Edgar Montrose

    What about Supreme Court Justices who confiscate voice recorders at speeches in public places?

    1. Avatar of Erich Vieth
      Erich Vieth

      Where are you going to ultimately appeal that case? It’s the similar problem with rules of ethics. The U.S. Supreme Court Judges are the only judges who are not subject to any rules of ethics.

  2. Avatar of Niklaus Pfirsig
    Niklaus Pfirsig

    Erich,

    If the act of confiscation is itself unlawful, could the citizens press criminal charges of robbery against the the enforcement officers who take the cameras? Just wondering..

    1. Avatar of Erich Vieth
      Erich Vieth

      Niklaus: It seems like it is an unlawful taking to me, which would likely give rise to an action for conversion. I haven’t done the research, but that is my gut feeling. It might qualify as the crime of stealing, but good luck getting the prosecutor to prosecute a police officer, or those on whose behalf he/she acted.

Leave a Reply