Before Galileo, and ever since Aristotle, many people believed that heavier objects fell faster than lighter objects. That might be true where air impedes light objects, such as feathers, but many people believed that even in the absence of air heavier objects always fell faster, and it was commonly assumed that, heavier cannonballs fall faster than light cannonballs, even in the absence of any scientific data. The beauty of the scientific method comes front and center in this simple experiment conducted on the surface of the moon by Apollo 15 astronaut Dave Scott.
Scientific method employed on the moon
- Post author:Erich Vieth
- Post published:January 23, 2011
- Post category:Science / scientific method
- Post comments:2 Comments
Erich Vieth
Erich Vieth is an attorney focusing on civil rights (including First Amendment), consumer law litigation and appellate practice. At this website often writes about censorship, corporate news media corruption and cognitive science. He is also a working musician, artist and a writer, having founded Dangerous Intersection in 2006. Erich lives in St. Louis, Missouri with his two daughters.
Just to be clear, Air "impedes" all objects based on their relative profile and aerodynamics. Gravity pulls on all objects of equal mass the same. A feather falls more slowly because of two reasons:
1. it's wide flat profile relative to mass incurs more wind resistance compared to a round cannonball
2. it has less mass
Thanks for the clarification, Dave. I was sloppy.