This is the real reason the Biden-Harris Administration is risking the deaths of hundreds of millions of Americans in a nuclear war. Now we are hearing them say it out loud.

For more on this horrifying situation and for a LOT more deep analysis on U.S. dysfunction that you owe it to yourself to hear, consider viewing Tucker Carlson’s interview with Amaryllis Fox Kennedy. From this Youtube video description: “She spent ten years as a CIA officer before running Bobby Kennedy Jr.’s presidential campaign. She’s now campaigning for Trump.”

[Added Oct 28, 2024]

I created a transcript of an excerpt from the end of the interview of Amaryllis Kennedy:

Tucker Carlson
I know you married in the family and all that, but still, you became Bobby Kennedy’s campaign manager. And now Bobby Kennedy’s endorsed Trump and I just don’t think you could hoist a bigger middle finger in the face of the world that you’re from. I mean, I just know that, because I know that world. So did you even hesitate before doing that? What was your thinking? I’m sure none of your classmates did anything like that. Why did you do that?

Amaryllis Kennedy
You know, if they came down from Mars and you put the exact occur, you know, what is happening right now, in front of them, without the names of the parties or the names of the participants and said: you have one four year stint where no new wars are started, where, bread costs half of what it costs now, gas a third. You know, et cetera, et cetera. You know, rises in standard of living across the country. Lower suicide rates, lower depression, lower homelessness, lower incarceration, lower immigration that is illegal and results in children being lost around the country.

And then you compare it with four years of another government that is endorsed, by the way, by Dick Cheney now and a host of neocons that involves two new wars. Printing a trillion dollars of additional debt that is a tax on the poor and on future generations in order to pay for more war. More children going into poverty. More–you know that we have a real unemployment rate of 25% in this country? A quarter, when you take into account people who want a full time job and don’t have one, or people who have a full time job but don’t make $25,000 a year, which is not a living wage. If you take that into account, we have 24.9% true unemployment rate.

You asked about people in my world. I think if you put any of that to them, and then on top of that, said, and this leader that has plunged people into poverty and unemployment had two, two additional wars started on his watch, is censoring speech on social media, weaponizing the courts to take people of his own party and every single other party off of the ballot. I mean, literally, Dean Phillips, Marianne Williamson, Robert Kennedy Jr, obviously, President Trump, Jill Stein, everybody. There’s nobody that, as far as I know, that didn’t face some kind of a lawsuit to try to challenge their actual ballot access, the ability for an American to turn up and exercise their own sacred individual sovereignty of thought and choose whether or not to vote for them. Every single one of them was attacked in court to get their name off of the ballot. It’s like we believe in democracy. You can vote for anyone, as long as it’s me.

I believe that anyone who I knew growing up, and hopefully any American that I didn’t know growing up, when they see it with the in-group, out-group coding stripped away, would all choose the same outcome here. I think the challenge is that we are evolutionarily designed to retain the approval of our group. When you’re walking across the, you know, the early Savannah, and your your group shuns you. You know, you’re out of luck, right? It’s a lot harder to survive. There’s a study that DARPA did around reading news where they they expected the frontal lobe to light up because you were assessing the logic of what you were reading, and actually it lights up second after this area over the ear, which is, if you hold up a shirt and think about whether your friends would make fun of you if you wore it. So you know you are using your analytical mind, but only after you’ve already decided whether you are using it to poke holes, or to reinforce and I think that honestly, my friends who don’t support President Trump, I think that’s why.I guess everything you’ve said is true, and for the third time, nicely put, but I also have a little more difficulty giving that group a pass, because that’s our that’s our leadership class, raised and to some extent, to be brutally honest, bred to rule. And every society has that class, and that’s fine with me. I think it’s inevitable. It’s part of the human ordering. But that class should be able to think critically and rationally. That’s their job. And they’re not. And I just don’t understand how this happened, a total breakdown in the sort of mental faculties of the people who run everything, like, what the hell.

I mean, part of it, I think, is this intentional, addictive, hypnotic quality of media and social media that has really intentionally been designed that way. You know, Callie Means talks about how the tobacco companies bought, you know, the food companies and sent over their chemists and made them intentionally addictive. And that is horrifying and true. I feel that the same has really been done to our information ecosystem, and part of it is for corporate profit, and part of it is for political control. And as as that media environment has also become more global, and these partnerships with other parties and other countries assist in censorship, I think it’s difficult to to think critically without a single input telling you that you’re living in The Truman Show.

Theagency [CIA] used to have this, these things called Red teams, right, where they would in the 80s, they started putting analysts in kind of a bunker for three to three months or six months that looked for all the world like you were living in the Soviet Union. And all of the books that you had available were all the things that you would be reading if you were military or leadership class there, and you’re listening to live radio broadcasts in Russian and just living the life of a Soviet leader in the bunker.

And every day you’re writing what you would do, you know, today I would push on the Berlin Wall and that is actually one of the things that came out of it, was when was the time? A suggestion of the timing for when Reagan should, should push on, on bringing down the wall. But it allowed people to really channel their adversary, to such a degree that they were viewed with a lot of suspicion. When they came out, it was like, Well, now you’ve gone native, you know now like you’re you, maybe you’re the enemy now, and after 911 they started ramping these things back up around Islamic extremism, and reading, you know, all of the old academic writings of, you know, some of the the more violent jihad leaders and so on. And there that suspicion remained.

The better you performed in there, in terms of really being able to get into somebody’s mind, the more suspicious people were of you when you left. And you were generally put on some kind of, like a teaching assignment, or some, you know, somewhere you couldn’t really do any harm. I tell that story because it’s very interesting to me it’s like a tacit acknowledgement that you are what you read. You are what you’re immersed in, right? And you can have been, you know, this 1980s cold warrior, so much so that you’re working, you know, as an analyst in Russia House at CIA. Presumably, you’re, like, pretty dyed in the wool, you know, Blue Team. And then you do this three months, or you do this six months, and it is so convincing–this immersion in the thoughts and radio and books and beliefs of your adversary that you might just be lost forever when you come out right. You might have just had a full conversion experience. I think that is what’s happening. I think that media approach is now the experiment that’s running all around us all the time.

Tucker Carlson 9:54
Yes, I agree with that. So such terrifying effect. I. Wish we had more time,

Amaryllis Kennedy:
There’s always more time, all in God’s time. But this was so nice to stop and actually talk about some, some of the real challenges that you know, I think sometimes in the final weeks of the campaign. Everything becomes about, you know, the day’s polls, or, you know, whatever the the media opportunity of the day was, and in the end, this is what’s at stake. I mean, we’re talking about decisions over the very constitutional ideals that this country was built on the physical safety of our communities, of our families. It’s really one of the only times that, as a parent, you are putting the lives of your children in the hands of someone who, frankly, is a stranger to you. And you know, when you look at these EMP scenarios, and then you look at these censorship scenarios, you know the the well-being of our Constitution, of our children and of human freedom is at stake here. And you know, if it weren’t, I wouldn’t be fighting for it so hard. But thank you for taking the time to really dig in to those issues, rather than, you know, the latest photo op of the day.