The first question we must ask regarding EVERY controversy is whether one side is disproportionately well-funded, institutionally-fortified and ill-motivated (by $, power or ideology) and thus able to manufacture a false consensus. If so, meaningful discussion is impossible.
Excellent analysis of the problem with most transgender discussions by Geoffrey Miller here:
Good thread, in principle. But in practice, the woke left has captured most of the biomedical scientific institutions.
If we want studies challenging their narrative, who gives the research grants?
Which academics would have the guts to run the studies, knowing it would nuke their careers?
Who else is willing to collaborate on the studies?
Which journals would even consider them?
Who would review them objectively?
How would journals withstand woke pressure to retract ‘transphobic’ studies?
Which media would cover the results, rather than ignoring them?
These problems seem very severe… and probably explain why we haven’t already seen countervailing studies.
