Even if you’re pro-gender ideology, why not just say “woman” and “trans woman?”
Why would an additional modifier (“cis,” etc) for 99.5% of the population ever be necessary? We don’t use the label “hearing man” every time we describe someone who is not deaf.
Other contributors to this thread wrote:
Thank you for pointing this out I will now be referring to every person who is not disabled as able-bodied man or able-bodied woman. Brilliant.
Because it’s a signaler that when you use it, it signals that you have accepted the gender cult’s dogma.
because, no matter how hard they try to convince themselves and everyone else, they know it’s not the same!
That’s power. Make 99.5% do the extra work.
—woman
—cis woman
simple 😐Norm Macdonald once said cisgender was “a way of marginalizing a normal person.”
Because no men are a subset of women. There are women and men. That’s it. Some men LARP as a 1950s version of women but that doesn’t make them women
