Modern versions of CRT conflict with the Civil Rights Movement for these reasons:
A) CRT and antiracism are obsessed with dividing people into “colors” and treating them differently on the basis of “color.”
B) The Platform of CRT and antiracism have no meaningful mechanism for improving the lives of the poor minority populations they pretend to serve.
C) CRT and antiracism excel at denying data relating to their mission (including police statistics and economic facts, such as the fact that 60% of Americans who identify as “black” are middle class or above).
D) CRT and antiracism advocates do not extol the teachings of Martin Luther King. In fact, King’s teachings are barely mentioned in training materials.
There are other difference too, but this is a sampling based upon some of the articles I’ve written recently.
Increasing numbers of people are starting to understand that CRT and “antiracism” conflict with the traditional Civil Rights Movement. In reaction, apologists for CRT and “anti-racism” are taking the position that CRT and “antiracism” are not being taught in schools. I see this as motivated reasoning based on the fact that most of these people (the ones I know) are only exposed to left-leaning legacy media that refuses to cover the fact that obsessions with skin “color” and other divisive poisons are increasingly being taught in K-12 and colleges. Left-leaning media admits of only a few outliers and deny that CRT or antiracism is a significant problem in the U.S. I disagree, based on these news reports:
The recent case of Dana stangel-Plowe, former teacher at a school in Englewood.
The recent case of Paul Rossi.
The observations of Andrew Gutmann, a former parent at Brearly School.
Christopher Rufo’s reports based upon leaked training materials at numerous schools.
Chloe Valdary teaches a good-hearted program to diminish bigotry she compares to the CRT programs of which she is knowledgable.
Numerous reports by Parents Defending Education.
Numerous reports of attempted cancellation based on CRT here.
Reports at businesses by Counterweight.
Many more reports here, by Princetonians for Free Speech.
I have also been personally contacted by approximately a dozen people who work in academia who are afraid to speech honestly on issues because CRT permeates the campus
More reports here (Stanford) and here (Rutgers).
John McWhorter’s receipt of numerous complaints (see the comments) here.
Another recent resource is Christopher Rufo’s “Critical Race Theory Briefing Book.”
There are numerous other reports, more of them surfacing every week. I will update this list periodically in the comments.
Bank of America is pushing Woke dogma on its employees.
Verizon is Woke. Report by Christopher Rufo. https://www.city-journal.org/verizon-critical-race-theory-training?wallit_nosession=1
Quillette offers these accounts of Woke campuses here: https://quillette.com/2021/09/18/quillettes-best-on-woke-universities/
Needham Public Schools, in Massachusetts: https://defendinged.org/incidents/needham-high-school-principal-tells-students-on-first-day-of-school-im-a-privileged-straight-white-man/
Christoper Rufo Tweet:
“@CVSHealth CEO Larry Merlo earned 618 times more than the median CVS employee salary, while simultaneously promoting the idea that America is “racist” and forcing hourly-wage workers to deconstruct their racial and sexual “privilege.”Here is the full story.” https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1440769298574704640
Critical Race Theory is being taught at Walmart. Here is an excerpt from an article at National Review.
Critical Race Theory (or, at least, the principles of CRT) are widely taught in K-12:
Meanwhile, in Providence, Rhode Island, a teacher named Ramona Bessinger is being forced to walk the CRT gauntlet:
https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/10/providence-anti-critical-race-whistleblower-teacher-ramona-bessinger-taunted-in-troubling-schoolyard-incident/
October 26, 2021 Summary by Chris Rufo:
“Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) is requiring parents to sign a form comparable to a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) to view a portion of the district’s new curriculum inspired by critical race theory, according to documents reviewed by the Daily Caller.”
https://dailycaller.com/2021/10/25/loudoun-county-parents-sign-nda-form-critical-race-theory-curriculum/
From National Review, November 6, 2021:
MIT: To Alums urges others to stop donating money to universities such as MIT that have turned woke.
Washington Post says CRT is and is not being taught to K-12.
Waukeegan Public Schools in Illinois:
Grass Valley Califormia: https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1459986623274229765
Colorado School teacher proudly states that he is teaching Critical Race Theory:
The Lower Manhattan Community School
University of Michigan, as reported by Reason Magazine:
The University of Michigan opened this academic year with an academic freedom scandal. Music professor Bright Sheng showed his class the 1965 film of Othello with Laurence Olivier playing the Moor in dark makeup. Students demanded action. The university removed Sheng from the classroom and opened an investigation. The Academic Freedom Alliance condemned the university for violating Professor Sheng’s academic freedom. The university eventually relented and dropped the investigation. Unfortunately, that is not quite the end of the matter.
Professor Sheng has not been returned to his class, though he continues to do some teaching and is scheduled to resume his normal teaching activities in the spring. The university has hardly recognized its error and has failed to adequately reaffirm its commitments to academic freedom. Not exactly an encouraging sign for the future.
University of Nebraska
Christopher Rufo:
Seattle Public Schools
Detroit Public Schools:
Detroit Superintendent @Dr_Vitti:
The Medical Profession, Generally: This article at Quillette is “What is Happening to My Profession?”
Springfield (Missouri) School District Lawsuit.
Lawrence Krauss discussing the new problem with teaching science:
While there are many academic areas where raw political sensibilities might impact on scholarly discourse, it is hard to think of chemistry as such an area. Nevertheless, new guidelines for accepting and editing papers were recently sent to editors of the prestigious Journal of the Royal Society of Chemistry.
“Following the publication of the article by (Tomáš Hudlický) in (German journal) Angewandte Chemie and the identification of a potentially offensive image in a journal, a set of guidelines has been produced by RSC staff to help us minimise the risk of publishing inappropriate or otherwise offensive content. Offence is a subjective matter and sensitivity to it spans a considerable range; however, we bear in mind that it is the perception of the recipient that we should consider, regardless of the author’s intention . … Please consider whether or not any content (words, depictions or imagery) might have the potential to cause offence, referring to the guidelines as needed. ” (italics mine)
. . .For the moment, let’s concentrate on the italicized sentence. Considering the perception of any and all recipients, regardless of author intent, can effectively freeze all discourse. It is hard to imagine any sentence spoken in the public domain today that cannot possibly be construed as offensive to someone . . . Consider what subjects could now be reasonably censored by editors according to this new edict. Much of evolutionary biology could now be verboten, since the very subject offends the religious sensibilities of many Americans. Same too with The Big Bang. What about geology, where estimates of the age of rocks directly contradicts the hopes of young earth creationists? Much of genetic research is already the source of vocal protest, especially the genomics of diverse populations, and any investigations of correlations between race and other genetic traits.
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/lawrence-krauss-the-offence-offensive