How are things going in one upscale private progressive school in NY for the children of a Jewish woman and her Black husband? This is an excerpt from “My Kids and Their Elite Education in Racism: How Rye Country Day School reflects the madness of our times,” by Naomi Schaefer Riley:
I fear that the message currently emanating from teachers and administrators and politicians and pundits will harm [ ] relationships. The new anti-racism, with its endless cycles of victimization and demands for reparations—as opposed to the model of teaching people to aspire to colorblindness and providing everyone with equal opportunity—requires all of us (and children in particular) to see race all the time. This new model will turn what would otherwise be ordinary, healthy relationships—friendships, even—into dramas with racially defined roles for all the characters.
The good people of my community and others around the country are told that no matter how welcoming they are, how well they treat others, there is nothing they can do to make up for systemic racism. Will they begin to fret over every interaction, fearing that they could say or do the wrong thing? . . .
I worry that the message is already trickling down. Advice columns in recent years have featured parents asking whether it’s okay for them to adopt children of another race, or whether people can ever truly understand someone of another race enough to marry that person, or whether it wouldn’t be easier for same-sex couples to use the white partner’s egg so as not to have the insurmountable task of handling a black child. Could white supremacists of 50 years ago have dared to dream of such attitudes among people who call themselves liberals?
Fascists label themselves antifascist, which makes them acceptable to effete elitist whites lacking meaning in their lives, so they outsource their meaning. Racists label themselves antiracist, which makes them acceptable to the same group, which is outsourcing its outrage. It’s the same phenomenon seen in philanthropy: wealthy areas with markedly progressive voters, who accuse others of “not caring” about fill-in-the-blank, contribute less per capita to private charity than less-wealthy, less progressive areas. The progressives have outsourced charity to government.