If the media were really liberal, we would see a lot more coverage regarding these issues:
1. Where the jobs went.
2. Upward wealth redistribution and/or inequality.
3. ALEC.
4. The number of people in prison.
5. The number of black people in prison.
6. U.S. health care costs are the highest in the world.
7. Glass-Steagall.
8. Gerrymandering.
9. The number of bills blocked by Republicans in Congress.
10. The Citizens’ United Supreme Court decision
11. Nixon’s Southern Strategy.
12. Tax cuts primarily benefit the wealthy.
13. What’s happening to the bees?
14. The impact of temporary workers on our economy.
15. Media consolidation
If the media were “liberal,” it would serve the public interest and shine a light on issues like the ones above.
More people would also have a better understanding of global warming, peak oil, population growth, political lobbying, government’s role in a functioning economy, how much we spend on the military, and countless other issues.
What you’re more likely to see in the media, however, are stories designed to get you to buy their paper, or watch their show, or listen to their radio station. If it bleeds, it leads. This is why the media is concerned with scandal, celebrities, gossip, and fear.
If anything, our news consists of paid advertisements and outlets too scared of offending anyone to publish much of substance. Investigative journalism is also expensive; entertainment is cheap. . .
One way to approach the topic is to simply ask: If we have a “liberal media,” where are the liberal stories?
I’e noted that NewsCorp’s properties,have “leaned” so much to the right that they are near or at the point of lying on their right side. From this vantage point, any and every less extreme opinion, however right leaning, appears to NewsCorp customers as left-wing. Truly left wing reporting in this reference frame then appears as upside down.