In a live interview sponsored by the Guardian, Edward Snowden provided more details regarding NSA spying. If 20% of his information is true, Congress should tear apart the NSA, piece by piece.
Snowden makes an important distinction between what the NSA policy requires and what really happens on the ground. This is an attack on NSA credibility, which is already highly suspect.
Common Dreams presents the entire transcript from today’s Q & A. http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/06/17-1
21 Facts about NSA Snooping that everyone should know. http://www.activistpost.com/2013/06/21-facts-about-nsa-snooping-that-every.html
Comment from ProPublica, regarding NSA claims that it’s massive surveillance has helped catch terrorists in Europe:
—
http://www.propublica.org/article/how-the-nsas-high-tech-surveillance-helped-europeans-catch-terrorists
For me, the most disturbing thing about the NSA spying is that there appears to be nearly free access to the database by workers at any one of the multinational corporations that has been subcontracted to maintain it. That leaves it open to being abused for political purposes.
Agreed. If Snowden was even 20% accurate, the system is abusive and unaccountable.
From The Nation, Jonathan Schell, “America’s Surveillance Net”:
What should Americans do when all official channels are unresponsive or dysfunctional? Are we, as people used to say, in a revolutionary situation? Shall we man the barricades? The situation is a little more peculiar than that. There is a revolution afoot, but it is not one in the streets; it is one that is being carried out by the government against the fundamental law of the land. That this insurrection against the constitutional order by officials sworn to uphold it includes legal opinions and legislation only makes it the more radical and dangerous. In other words, the government is in stealthy insurrection against the letter and the spirit of the law.
What’s needed is counterrevolution—an American restoration, returning to and reaffirming the principles on which the Republic was founded. Edward Snowden, for one, knew what to do. He saw that when government as a whole goes rogue, the only force with a chance of bringing it back into line is the public. He has helped make this possible by letting the public know the abuses that are being carried out in its name. Civil disobedients are of two kinds: those inspired by universal principles, and those inspired by national traditions. Each has its strengths. Julian Assange of WikiLeaks is the first kind; Snowden, the second. Asked why he had done what he did, Snowden replied, “I am neither traitor nor hero. I am an American.” He based his actions on the finest traditions of this country, which its current leaders have abandoned but which, he hopes, the current generation of Americans still share. In the weeks and months ahead, we’ll find out whether he was right. Jonathan Schell
http://www.thenation.com/article/174889/americas-surveillance-net#axzz2WoMLAAoW
Mr. Snowden is but one of literally hundreds of thousands of private-sector intelligence workers, many of whom possess top-secret security clearances. His employer at the time of the leaks, Booz Allen Hamilton, is one of the largest and most profitable corporations in the United States, with nearly all of its recent $5.7 billion in annual revenue from contracts with one government department or another, and almost a fourth of it from intelligence work alone. Of the estimated $80 billion the government will spend on intelligence this year, most is spent on private contractors.
It is highly doubtful, however, that American taxpayers are getting their money’s worth. . . .
Security experts have pointed out that the proliferation of private sector employees with top-secret clearances, now estimated at up to 500,000, makes breaches more likely. And when senators asked at the hearing in 2011 whether the intelligence system was properly balanced between the public and private sectors, several witnesses raised concerns about the overreliance on contractors. These concerns included not only the risk of increased security breaches but also conflicts of interest, blurred lines of authority and diminished accountability.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/20/opinion/prying-private-eyes.html?hp&_r=0
Edward Snowden is THIS kind of coward:
https://danbojangles.wordpress.com/2013/06/12/what-kind-of-coward-is-edward-snowden/comment-page-1/#comment-49
David Sirota:
Snowden’s decision to flee the United States has often been depicted as an act of treason unto itself. The idea is that whereas Daniel Ellsberg was a hero for blowing the whistle and remaining in the United States, Snowden is a coward for blowing the whistle and fleeing. Left largely unmentioned is the big change between the time of Ellsberg’s disclosures and today: this White House is waging an unprecedented campaign to criminalize whistleblowing; it sometimes tortures whistleblowers; and it claims the right to extra-judicially assassinate American citizens who criticize the government but haven’t even been formally charged for a single crime. In light of this, why have most media outlets not bothered to even ask whether Snowden’s location outside the United States is, unto itself, a response to these troubling changes in U.S. government policy?
http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/why_shouldnt_david_gregory_be_charged_with_a_crime/
Noam Chomsky:
“They [governments and corporations] take whatever is available, and in no time it is being used against us, the population. Governments are not representative. They have their own power, serving segments of the population that are dominant and rich.”
http://www.alternet.org/chomsky-nsa